Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Aug;29(8):927-31. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1453-z. Epub 2010 May 16.
The aim of this study was to evaluate if pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) has additional effect on the classical physical treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) composed of hot pack, therapeutic ultrasound, and terminal isometric exercises. Forty patients (29 women and 11 men), ages 44 to 78 (mean age was 61.3 +/- 7.8 years) were included in our study. Patients with knee osteoarthritis [Kellgren-Lawrence criteria grade 2 and above and an average pain intensity of 40 or more on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS)] recruited from outpatient physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic were randomly assigned to receive PEMF or sham PEMF treatment in addition to their physical therapy. Both the PEMF and sham PEMF treatments being evaluated were 55 min/session, five sessions per week for 2 weeks. Each session comprise 20-min hot pack, 5-min therapeutic ultrasound, and 30-min PEMF or sham PEMF treatment applied to the knee of the patients. Patients were evaluated by the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index and VAS at the baseline and at the end of treatment. Both PEMF and sham PEMF treatment groups showed statistically significant improvement in WOMAC pain and functional scores at the end of treatment (p < 0.001 in both groups). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in WOMAC pain, stiffness, and physical function scores after treatment (p = 0.906, p = 0.855, p = 0.809, respectively). There was neither difference in concomitant used acetaminophen dose in both groups (p = 0.289). The results of this study show that PEMF does not have additional effect on the classical physical treatment in reducing symptoms of knee OA.
本研究旨在评估脉冲电磁场疗法(PEMF)是否对由热包敷、治疗性超声波和末端等长运动组成的膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的经典物理治疗有额外作用。40 名患者(29 名女性和 11 名男性),年龄 44 至 78 岁(平均年龄为 61.3 +/- 7.8 岁)纳入本研究。在门诊物理医学和康复诊所招募的膝关节骨关节炎患者[Kellgren-Lawrence 分级 2 级及以上,平均疼痛强度为 100mm 视觉模拟量表(VAS)的 40 或以上]随机分配接受 PEMF 或假 PEMF 治疗,以及他们的物理治疗。正在评估的 PEMF 和假 PEMF 治疗均为 55 分钟/次,每周 5 次,共 2 周。每个疗程包括 20 分钟的热包敷、5 分钟的治疗性超声波和 30 分钟的 PEMF 或假 PEMF 治疗应用于患者的膝盖。患者在基线和治疗结束时通过 Western Ontario 和 McMaster 大学骨关节炎(WOMAC)指数和 VAS 进行评估。在治疗结束时,PEMF 和假 PEMF 治疗组在 WOMAC 疼痛和功能评分方面均显示出统计学上的显著改善(两组均为 p < 0.001)。治疗后,两组在 WOMAC 疼痛、僵硬和身体功能评分方面无统计学差异(分别为 p = 0.906、p = 0.855、p = 0.809)。两组同时使用的对乙酰氨基酚剂量也无差异(p = 0.289)。本研究结果表明,PEMF 对减轻膝关节 OA 症状的经典物理治疗没有额外作用。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016-4
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005-7
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017-1
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024-7-26
J Clin Med. 2022-6-28
Int J Mol Sci. 2021-12-24
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006-6-15
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005-7
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005-1
Bioelectromagnetics. 2004-5
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004-2