Mark Kristen P, Herbenick Debby, Fortenberry J Dennis, Sanders Stephanie, Reece Michael
a Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion , University of Kentucky.
J Sex Res. 2014;51(2):159-69. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2013.816261. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
This study was designed to systematically compare and contrast the psychometric properties of three scales developed to measure sexual satisfaction and a single-item measure of sexual satisfaction. The Index of Sexual Satisfaction (ISS), Global Measure of Sexual Satisfaction (GMSEX), and the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale-Short (NSSS-S) were compared to one another and to a single-item measure of sexual satisfaction. Conceptualization of the constructs, distribution of scores, internal consistency, convergent validity, test-retest reliability, and factor structure were compared between the measures. A total of 211 men and 214 women completed the scales and a measure of relationship satisfaction, with 33% (n = 139) of the sample reassessed two months later. All scales demonstrated appropriate distribution of scores and adequate internal consistency. The GMSEX, NSSS-S, and the single-item measure demonstrated convergent validity. Test-retest reliability was demonstrated by the ISS, GMSEX, and NSSS-S, but not the single-item measure. Taken together, the GMSEX received the strongest psychometric support in this sample for a unidimensional measure of sexual satisfaction and the NSSS-S received the strongest psychometric support in this sample for a bidimensional measure of sexual satisfaction.
本研究旨在系统比较和对比为测量性满意度而开发的三个量表以及一项性满意度单项测量的心理测量特性。对性满意度指数(ISS)、性满意度总体测量(GMSEX)和新性满意度短量表(NSSS-S)进行了相互比较,并与一项性满意度单项测量进行了比较。比较了各测量方法在构念概念化、分数分布、内部一致性、收敛效度、重测信度和因子结构方面的差异。共有211名男性和214名女性完成了这些量表以及一项关系满意度测量,其中33%(n = 139)的样本在两个月后进行了重新评估。所有量表均显示出适当的分数分布和足够的内部一致性。GMSEX、NSSS-S和单项测量均显示出收敛效度。ISS、GMSEX和NSSS-S显示出重测信度,但单项测量未显示出重测信度。总体而言,GMSEX在本样本中作为性满意度单维测量获得了最强的心理测量支持,而NSSS-S在本样本中作为性满意度二维测量获得了最强的心理测量支持。