School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, 440 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1041, USA.
Ecol Lett. 2013 Nov;16(11):1373-81. doi: 10.1111/ele.12182. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
The coexistence of competing species depends on the balance between their fitness differences, which determine their competitive inequalities, and their niche differences, which stabilise their competitive interactions. Darwin proposed that evolution causes species' niches to diverge, but the influence of evolution on relative fitness differences, and the importance of both niche and fitness differences in determining coexistence have not yet been studied together. We tested whether the phylogenetic distances between species of green freshwater algae determined their abilities to coexist in a microcosm experiment. We found that niche differences were more important in explaining coexistence than relative fitness differences, and that phylogenetic distance had no effect on either coexistence or on the sizes of niche and fitness differences. These results were corroborated by an analysis of the frequency of the co-occurrence of 325 pairwise combinations of algal taxa in > 1100 lakes across North America. Phylogenetic distance may not explain the coexistence of freshwater green algae.
共存的竞争物种取决于它们之间的适应差异的平衡,这种适应差异决定了它们的竞争不平等性,以及它们的生态位差异,这种差异稳定了它们的竞争相互作用。达尔文提出,进化导致物种的生态位发生分歧,但进化对相对适应差异的影响,以及生态位和适应差异在决定共存中的重要性,尚未被一起研究过。我们通过在微宇宙实验中检验了绿藻物种之间的系统发育距离是否决定了它们在微宇宙中共存的能力。我们发现,生态位差异比相对适应差异更能解释共存现象,而系统发育距离对共存或生态位和适应差异的大小都没有影响。这些结果通过对北美的 1100 多个湖泊中 325 对藻类分类群组合的共存频率的分析得到了证实。系统发育距离可能无法解释淡水绿藻的共存现象。