• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外实验评价抗菌和非抗菌医用检查手套对四种细菌的皮肤至表面回收率。

In-vitro experimental evaluation of skin-to-surface recovery of four bacterial species by antibacterial and non-antibacterial medical examination gloves.

机构信息

Department for Hospital Hygiene, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2013 Oct 11;2(1):27. doi: 10.1186/2047-2994-2-27.

DOI:10.1186/2047-2994-2-27
PMID:24119412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3852982/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The number of bacteria recovered from a stainless steel coupon after touching a pigskin substrate with an examination glove coated on its outside with polyhexanide (PHMB), as compared to the number of bacteria recovered in the same manner with non-coated control gloves was evaluated.

METHODS

Suspensions containing 1 × 109 colony-forming units of 4 clinically relevant bacterial species (Enterococcus faecium ATCC #51559; Escherichia coli ATCC #25922; Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC #4352; and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC #33591) were used to contaminate Gamma-irradiated pigskin substrates. Bacterial recoveries from the pigskin substrate, stainless steel coupons, and each glove swatch were performed. A difference in the bacterial recovery from the stainless steel coupons after touching with coated and uncoated control gloves was measured.

RESULTS

For E. faecium, the coated glove showed a reduction of 4.63 log10 cfu recovery, when compared to control gloves. For E. coli, the coated glove showed 5.48 log10 cfu, for K. pneumoniae 5.03 log10 cfu, and for S. aureus 5.72 log10 cfu recovery, when compared to the non-coated control glove.

CONCLUSION

An in-vitro experiment designed to mimic cross-contamination of clinically relevant bacteria in a simulated healthcare setting following glove contact with a contaminated biological surface and cross-transfer to a stainless steel surface has demonstrated that an examination glove coated on its outside surface with PHMB was able to reduce bacterial recovery from a contaminated surface by > 4 log10 cfu, compared to a control non-coated examination glove. These elaborated results may encourage further clinical investigation on the clinical impact of an antibacterial examination glove.

摘要

背景

将涂有聚六亚甲基双胍(PHMB)的检查手套的外侧接触涂有伽马射线的猪皮基质,与以相同方式用未涂覆的对照手套接触相比,从不锈钢卡箍上回收的细菌数量与从相同方式回收的细菌数量进行了评估。

方法

使用含有 4 种临床相关细菌(屎肠球菌 ATCC #51559;大肠杆菌 ATCC #25922;肺炎克雷伯菌 ATCC #4352;金黄色葡萄球菌 ATCC #33591)的 1×109 个菌落形成单位的悬浮液污染伽马射线照射的猪皮基质。从猪皮基质、不锈钢卡箍和每个手套拭子中进行细菌回收。测量涂覆和未涂覆对照手套接触后从不锈钢卡箍上回收细菌的差异。

结果

对于粪肠球菌,与对照手套相比,涂覆手套的回收率降低了 4.63 log10 cfu。对于大肠杆菌,涂覆手套的回收率为 5.48 log10 cfu,肺炎克雷伯菌为 5.03 log10 cfu,金黄色葡萄球菌为 5.72 log10 cfu,与未涂覆的对照手套相比。

结论

一项旨在模拟临床相关细菌在模拟医疗保健环境中的交叉污染的体外实验,即在手套接触污染的生物表面后交叉转移到不锈钢表面,结果表明,与对照非涂覆的检查手套相比,涂覆有 PHMB 的检查手套的外侧表面能够减少从污染表面回收的细菌数量> 4 log10 cfu。这些详细的结果可能会鼓励进一步对具有抗菌作用的检查手套的临床影响进行临床研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34eb/3852982/3c5de07faa1e/2047-2994-2-27-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34eb/3852982/3c5de07faa1e/2047-2994-2-27-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34eb/3852982/3c5de07faa1e/2047-2994-2-27-1.jpg

相似文献

1
In-vitro experimental evaluation of skin-to-surface recovery of four bacterial species by antibacterial and non-antibacterial medical examination gloves.体外实验评价抗菌和非抗菌医用检查手套对四种细菌的皮肤至表面回收率。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2013 Oct 11;2(1):27. doi: 10.1186/2047-2994-2-27.
2
Antibacterial activity of a sterile antimicrobial polyisoprene surgical glove against transient flora following a 2-hours simulated use.无菌抗菌聚异戊二烯手术手套在模拟使用2小时后对暂居菌的抗菌活性。
BMC Surg. 2015 Jul 4;15:81. doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0058-5.
3
Evaluation of the efficacy of antibacterial medical gloves in the ICU setting.评价抗菌医疗手套在 ICU 环境中的功效。
J Hosp Infect. 2015 Jul;90(3):248-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
4
Chlorhexidine-coated surgical gloves influence the bacterial flora of hands over a period of 3 hours.氯己定涂层手术手套会在手长达 3 小时的时间内影响手部的细菌菌群。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Sep 6;7:108. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0395-0. eCollection 2018.
5
Suppression of surgeons' bacterial hand flora during surgical procedures with a new antimicrobial surgical glove.使用新型抗菌手术手套在手术过程中抑制外科医生手部细菌菌群
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Feb;15(1):43-9. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.230. Epub 2013 Oct 12.
6
Effect of poly-hexamethylene biguanide hydrochloride (PHMB) treated non-sterile medical gloves upon the transmission of Streptococcus pyogenes, carbapenem-resistant E. coli, MRSA and Klebsiella pneumoniae from contact surfaces.聚六亚甲基双胍盐酸盐(PHMB)处理的非无菌医用手套对化脓性链球菌、耐碳青霉烯类大肠杆菌、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和肺炎克雷伯菌在接触表面传播的影响。
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Aug 17;17(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2661-9.
7
Transfer rates of pathogenic bacteria during pork processing.猪肉加工过程中病原菌的转移率。
J Anim Sci Technol. 2020 Nov;62(6):912-921. doi: 10.5187/jast.2020.62.6.912. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
8
Bacterial contamination of unused, disposable non-sterile gloves on a hospital orthopaedic ward.医院骨科病房未使用的一次性非无菌手套的细菌污染情况。
Australas Med J. 2013 Jun 30;6(6):331-8. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2013.1675. Print 2013.
9
Antiadherent and antibacterial properties of stainless steel and NiTi orthodontic wires coated with silver against Lactobacillus acidophilus--an in vitro study.涂银不锈钢和镍钛正畸丝对嗜酸乳杆菌的抗黏附和抗菌性能——一项体外研究
Prog Orthod. 2015;16:40. doi: 10.1186/s40510-015-0110-0. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
10
Activity of antimicrobial examination gloves under realistic conditions: challenge not fulfilled.在实际条件下对抗菌检查手套的活性进行检测:未达到挑战要求。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Oct 24;12(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01322-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Activity of antimicrobial examination gloves under realistic conditions: challenge not fulfilled.在实际条件下对抗菌检查手套的活性进行检测:未达到挑战要求。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Oct 24;12(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01322-z.
2
Performance-Enhancing Materials in Medical Gloves.医用手套中的性能增强材料。
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Jun 30;14(7):349. doi: 10.3390/jfb14070349.
3
Effect of poly-hexamethylene biguanide hydrochloride (PHMB) treated non-sterile medical gloves upon the transmission of Streptococcus pyogenes, carbapenem-resistant E. coli, MRSA and Klebsiella pneumoniae from contact surfaces.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of glove material upon the transfer of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to and from a gloved hand.手套材质对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌在戴手套的手与外界之间传递的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Jan;41(1):19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.03.017. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
2
Review on the efficacy, safety and clinical applications of polihexanide, a modern wound antiseptic.聚己缩胍在现代伤口抗菌剂中的疗效、安全性和临床应用评价。
Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2010;23 Suppl:17-27. doi: 10.1159/000318264. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
3
Efficacy of novel antimicrobial gloves impregnated with antiseptic dyes in preventing the adherence of multidrug-resistant nosocomial pathogens.
聚六亚甲基双胍盐酸盐(PHMB)处理的非无菌医用手套对化脓性链球菌、耐碳青霉烯类大肠杆菌、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和肺炎克雷伯菌在接触表面传播的影响。
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Aug 17;17(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2661-9.
4
Antimicrobial efficacy of preoperative skin antisepsis and clonal relationship to postantiseptic skin-and-wound flora in patients undergoing clean orthopedic surgery.接受清洁骨科手术患者术前皮肤消毒的抗菌效果及与消毒后皮肤和伤口菌群的克隆关系
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Nov;34(11):2265-73. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2478-7. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
浸渍抗菌染料的新型抗菌手套在预防多重耐药医院病原体黏附方面的效果。
Am J Infect Control. 2009 May;37(4):294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.07.003. Epub 2009 Jan 19.
4
Contamination of examination gloves in patient rooms and implications for transmission of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms .病房中检查手套的污染情况及对抗菌药物耐药微生物传播的影响
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Jan;29(1):63-5. doi: 10.1086/524338.
5
Avoiding the resistance pitfall in infection control. Does the use of antiseptic products contribute to the spread of antibiotic resistance?避免感染控制中的耐药陷阱。使用抗菌产品会导致抗生素耐药性传播吗?
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006 Oct;52(10A Suppl):1S-3S.
6
Cationic antiseptics: diversity of action under a common epithet.阳离子防腐剂:同一名称下的作用多样性。
J Appl Microbiol. 2005;99(4):703-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02664.x.
7
Survey of knowledge, beliefs, and practices of neonatal intensive care unit healthcare workers regarding nosocomial infections, central venous catheter care, and hand hygiene.新生儿重症监护病房医护人员关于医院感染、中心静脉导管护理及手卫生的知识、信念和行为调查
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 Sep;25(9):747-52. doi: 10.1086/502471.
8
Efficacy and tolerability of ClO2-generating gloves.产生二氧化氯的手套的有效性和耐受性。
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Mar 15;38(6):857-63. doi: 10.1086/382535. Epub 2004 Feb 27.