Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University Detroit, MI, USA.
Front Genet. 2013 Sep 26;4:183. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00183. eCollection 2013.
Previous efforts to characterize conservation between the human and mouse genomes focused largely on sequence comparisons. These studies are inherently limited because they don't account for gene structure differences, which may exist despite genomic sequence conservation. Recent high-throughput transcriptome studies have revealed widespread and extensive overlaps between genes, and transcripts, encoded on both strands of the genomic sequence. This overlapping gene organization, which produces sense-antisense (SAS) gene pairs, is capable of effecting regulatory cascades through established mechanisms. We present an evolutionary conservation assessment of SAS pairs, on three levels: genomic, transcriptomic, and structural. From a genome-wide dataset of human SAS pairs, we first identified orthologous loci in the mouse genome, then assessed their transcription in the mouse, and finally compared the genomic structures of SAS pairs expressed in both species. We found that approximately half of human SAS loci have single orthologous locations in the mouse genome; however, only half of those orthologous locations have SAS transcriptional activity in the mouse. This suggests that high human-mouse gene conservation overlooks widespread distinctions in SAS pair incidence and expression. We compared gene structures at orthologous SAS loci, finding frequent differences in gene structure between human and orthologous mouse SAS pair members. Our categorization of human SAS pairs with respect to mouse conservation of expression as well as structure points to limitations of mouse models. Gene structure differences, including at SAS loci, may account for some of the phenotypic distinctions between primates and rodents. Genes in non-conserved SAS pairs may contribute to evolutionary lineage-specific regulatory outcomes.
先前对人类和小鼠基因组之间的保守性进行特征描述的研究主要集中在序列比较上。这些研究存在固有局限性,因为它们没有考虑到基因结构差异,尽管基因组序列存在保守性,但这种差异可能仍然存在。最近的高通量转录组研究揭示了广泛而广泛的基因和转录本在基因组序列的两条链上的重叠。这种重叠的基因组织产生了有意义的反义(SAS)基因对,能够通过已建立的机制产生调节级联。我们在三个层面上对 SAS 对进行了进化保守性评估:基因组、转录组和结构。从人类 SAS 对的全基因组数据集,我们首先在小鼠基因组中鉴定了直系同源基因座,然后评估了它们在小鼠中的转录活性,最后比较了在两种物种中表达的 SAS 对的基因组结构。我们发现,大约一半的人类 SAS 基因座在小鼠基因组中有一个单一的直系同源基因座;然而,只有一半的这些直系同源基因座在小鼠中具有 SAS 转录活性。这表明,人类和小鼠之间的高基因保守性忽略了 SAS 对发生和表达的广泛差异。我们比较了直系同源 SAS 基因座的基因结构,发现人类和同源小鼠 SAS 对成员之间的基因结构经常存在差异。我们根据小鼠表达和结构的保守性对人类 SAS 对进行分类,这表明小鼠模型存在局限性。基因结构差异,包括 SAS 基因座,可能是灵长类动物和啮齿动物之间表型差异的部分原因。非保守性 SAS 对中的基因可能有助于进化谱系特异性的调控结果。