J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Mar;114(3):470-474. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
Measuring food waste is essential to determine the impact of school interventions on what children eat. There are multiple methods used for measuring food waste, yet it is unclear which method is most appropriate in large-scale interventions with restricted resources. This study examines which of three visual tray waste measurement methods is most reliable, accurate, and cost-effective compared with the gold standard of individually weighing leftovers. School cafeteria researchers used the following three visual methods to capture tray waste in addition to actual food waste weights for 197 lunch trays: the quarter-waste method, the half-waste method, and the photograph method. Inter-rater and inter-method reliability were highest for on-site visual methods (0.90 for the quarter-waste method and 0.83 for the half-waste method) and lowest for the photograph method (0.48). This low reliability is partially due to the inability of photographs to determine whether packaged items (such as milk or yogurt) are empty or full. In sum, the quarter-waste method was the most appropriate for calculating accurate amounts of tray waste, and the photograph method might be appropriate if researchers only wish to detect significant differences in waste or consumption of selected, unpackaged food.
衡量食物浪费对于确定学校干预措施对儿童饮食的影响至关重要。有多种方法可用于测量食物浪费,但在资源有限的大规模干预措施中,哪种方法最合适尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较三种视觉餐盘浪费测量方法与单独称重剩余食物的金标准相比,哪种方法在可靠性、准确性和成本效益方面更具优势。学校自助餐厅研究人员除了实际食物浪费重量外,还使用以下三种视觉方法来捕捉 197 个餐盘的浪费情况:四分之一浪费法、二分之一浪费法和照片法。现场视觉方法的评价者间和方法间可靠性最高(四分之一浪费法为 0.90,二分之一浪费法为 0.83),而照片法的可靠性最低(0.48)。这种低可靠性部分归因于照片无法确定包装食品(如牛奶或酸奶)是满的还是空的。总之,四分之一浪费法最适合计算准确的餐盘浪费量,如果研究人员仅希望检测浪费或特定、未包装食品的消耗方面的显著差异,那么照片法可能是合适的选择。