Taylor Jennifer C, Yon Bethany A, Johnson Rachel K
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Sep;114(9):1359-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.02.029. Epub 2014 Apr 19.
As more and more interventions aim to increase schoolchildren's fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption, less resource-intensive yet valid alternatives to weighed plate waste (WPW) are needed for assessing dietary intake.
We aimed to test the reliability and validity of digital imaging (DI) and digital imaging with observation (DI+O) in assessing children's FV consumption during school lunch.
FV consumption (in grams) was assessed on lunch trays from third- to fifth-grade children over eight visits (31 to 68 trays collected per visit) to compare WPW with DI and DI+O.
Two elementary schools (327 and 631 students enrolled, respectively).
Interobserver reliability of DI. Validity of DI and DI+O compared against WPW.
Reliability was assessed by percent agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Validity was assessed by Pearson correlations, paired t tests, and Bland-Altman plots.
Reliability was acceptable for DI; percent agreement was 96% and the ICC was 0.92. FV consumption assessments by DI and WPW (n=159) were highly correlated (r=0.96; P<0.001). Mean FV consumption using DI (96.7 g) was within 1.0 g of WPW and not significantly different from WPW (P=0.56), and Bland-Altman limits of agreement for individual-tray FV consumption were -32.9 to 31.3 g. FV consumption assessments by DI+O and WPW were highly correlated (r=0.98; P<0.001). Mean FV consumption using DI+O (99.3 g) was within 1.0 g of WPW and not significantly different from WPW (P=0.38), and limits of agreement for individual-tray FV consumption were -25.0 to 26.8 g.
DI was reliable for assessing children's FV consumption during school lunch. DI and DI+O were valid for assessing mean consumption but less precise for estimating individual-tray consumption. Valid estimations of mean FV consumption were achieved using DI without cafeteria observations, thereby reducing labor and time. Thus, DI is especially promising for assessing children's mean FV consumption during school lunch.
随着越来越多的干预措施旨在增加学童的水果和蔬菜(FV)摄入量,在评估饮食摄入量时,需要比称重餐盘废弃物(WPW)资源消耗更少但同样有效的替代方法。
我们旨在测试数字成像(DI)和带观察的数字成像(DI+O)在评估学校午餐期间儿童FV摄入量方面的可靠性和有效性。
在八次访视中评估三至五年级儿童午餐托盘上的FV摄入量(以克为单位)(每次访视收集31至68个托盘),以比较WPW与DI和DI+O。
两所小学(分别有327名和631名学生入学)。
DI的观察者间可靠性。DI和DI+O与WPW相比的有效性。
通过一致性百分比和组内相关系数(ICC)评估可靠性。通过Pearson相关性、配对t检验和Bland-Altman图评估有效性。
DI的可靠性可以接受;一致性百分比为96%,ICC为0.92。DI和WPW对FV摄入量的评估(n=159)高度相关(r=0.96;P<0.001)。使用DI得出的平均FV摄入量(96.7克)与WPW相差1.0克以内,与WPW无显著差异(P=0.56),单个托盘FV摄入量的Bland-Altman一致性界限为-32.9至31.3克。DI+O和WPW对FV摄入量的评估高度相关(r=0.98;P<0.001)。使用DI+O得出的平均FV摄入量(99.3克)与WPW相差1.0克以内,与WPW无显著差异(P=0.38),单个托盘FV摄入量的一致性界限为-25.0至26.8克。
DI在评估学校午餐期间儿童的FV摄入量方面是可靠的。DI和DI+O在评估平均摄入量方面是有效的,但在估计单个托盘的摄入量方面不太精确。使用DI无需在自助餐厅进行观察即可有效估计平均FV摄入量,从而减少了劳动力和时间。因此,DI在评估学校午餐期间儿童的平均FV摄入量方面特别有前景。