Chen Huai Sheng, Wang Wei, Wu Sheng Nan, Liu Jian Ping
Intensive Care Unit, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Ji Nan University, 1017 Dong Men Bei Lu, Luo Hu District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong, China, 518020.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 18;2013(10):CD004471. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004471.pub3.
Myocarditis is defined as inflammation of the myocardium accompanied by myocellular necrosis. Experimental evidence suggests that autoimmune mechanisms follow viral infection, resulting in inflammation and necrosis in the myocardium. However, the use of corticosteroids as immunosuppressives for this condition remains controversial.
The existing review was updated. The primary objective of this review is to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of treating acute or chronic viral myocarditis with corticosteroids. The secondary objective is to determine the best dose regimen.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 7 of 12, 2012) on The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE OVID (1946 to July Week 2, 2012), EMBASE OVID (1980 to Week 29, 2012), BIOSIS Previews (1969 to 20 July 2012), ISI Web of Science (1970 to 20th July, 2012), and LILACS (from its inception to 25 July, 2012) , Chinese Biomed Database, CNKI and WANFANG Databases (from their inception to 31 December 2012). We applied no language restrictions.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of corticosteroids for viral myocarditis compared with no intervention, placebo, supportive therapy, antiviral agents therapy or conventional therapy, including trials of corticosteroids plus other treatment versus other treatment alone, irrespective of blinding, publication status, or language.
Two review authors extracted data independently. Results were presented as risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs), both with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Eight RCTs (with 719 participants) were included in this update. The trials were small in size and methodological quality was poor. Viral detection was performed in 38% of participants, among whom 56% had positive results. Mortality between corticosteroids and control groups was non-significant (RR, 0.93, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.24). At 1 to 3 months follow-up, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was higher in the corticosteroids group compared to the control group (MD 7.36%, 95% CI 4.94 to 9.79), but there was substantial heterogeneity. Benefits were observed in LVEF in two trials with 200 children given corticosteroids (MD 9.00%, 95% CI 7.48 to 10.52). New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and left ventricular end-stage systole diameter (LVESD) were not affected. Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) (MD -104.00 U/L, 95% CI -115.18 to -92.82), Isoenzyme of creatine phosphate MB (CKMB) (MD 10.35 U/L, 95% CI 8.92 to 11.78), were reduced in the corticosteroids group compared to the control group, although the evidence is limited to small participant numbers. There were insufficient data on adverse events.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For people diagnosed with viral myocarditis and low LVEF, corticosteroids do not reduce mortality. They may improve cardiac function but the trials were of low quality and small size so this finding must be regarded as uncertain. High-quality, large-scale RCTs should be careful designed to determine the role of corticosteroid treatment for viral myocarditis. Adverse events should also be carefully evaluated.
心肌炎被定义为伴有心肌细胞坏死的心肌炎症。实验证据表明,自身免疫机制在病毒感染后出现,导致心肌炎症和坏死。然而,使用皮质类固醇作为这种疾病的免疫抑制剂仍存在争议。
更新现有的综述。本综述的主要目的是评估用皮质类固醇治疗急性或慢性病毒性心肌炎的有益和有害作用。次要目的是确定最佳剂量方案。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL,2012年第12期第7卷)、Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE OVID(1946年至2012年7月第2周)、EMBASE OVID(1980年至2012年第29周)、BIOSIS Previews(1969年至2012年7月20日)、ISI科学网(1970年至2012年7月20日)和LILACS(从创刊至2012年7月25日)、中国生物医学数据库、CNKI和万方数据库(从创刊至2012年12月31日)。我们没有设置语言限制。
将皮质类固醇治疗病毒性心肌炎与无干预、安慰剂、支持治疗、抗病毒药物治疗或传统治疗进行比较的随机对照试验(RCT),包括皮质类固醇联合其他治疗与单独其他治疗的试验,无论是否设盲、发表状态或语言。
两位综述作者独立提取数据。结果以风险比(RRs)和平均差(MDs)表示,均带有95%置信区间(CIs)。
本次更新纳入了8项RCT(共719名参与者)。试验规模较小且方法学质量较差。38%的参与者进行了病毒检测,其中56%结果呈阳性。皮质类固醇组和对照组之间的死亡率无显著差异(RR,0.93,95%CI 0.70至1.24)。在1至3个月的随访中,皮质类固醇组的左心室射血分数(LVEF)高于对照组(MD 7.36%,95%CI 4.94至9.79),但存在较大异质性。在两项针对200名接受皮质类固醇治疗儿童的试验中观察到LVEF有改善(MD 9.00%,95%CI 7.48至10.52)。纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级和左心室末期收缩直径(LVESD)未受影响。与对照组相比,皮质类固醇组的肌酸磷酸激酶(CPK)(MD -104.00 U/L,95%CI -115.18至-92.82)、肌酸磷酸同工酶MB(CKMB)(MD 10.35 U/L,95%CI 8.92至11.78)降低,尽管证据仅限于少量参与者。关于不良事件的数据不足。
对于诊断为病毒性心肌炎且LVEF较低的患者,皮质类固醇不能降低死亡率。它们可能改善心脏功能,但试验质量较低且规模较小,因此这一发现必须视为不确定。应精心设计高质量、大规模的RCT来确定皮质类固醇治疗病毒性心肌炎的作用。还应仔细评估不良事件。