Jorrin-Novo Jesus V
Agroforestry and Plant Biochemistry and Proteomics Research Group, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Córdoba, Agrifood Campus of International Excellence, ceiA3, Córdoba, Spain.
Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1072:3-13. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-631-3_1.
In this first, introductory chapter, it is intended to summarize from a methodological point of view the state of the art in plant proteomics, focusing on mass spectrometry-based strategies. Thus, this chapter is mainly directed at beginners or at those trying to get into the field, rather than at those with real experience or a long trajectory in plant proteomics research. The different alternative workflows, methods, techniques, and protocols from the experimental design to the data analysis will be briefly commented, with cross references to previous monographs and reviews, as well as to the rest of the book chapters. The difficulty of working with proteins, together with the power, limitations, and challenges of the approach will also be briefly discussed.Proteins, as molecular entities, and the cell proteome, as a whole, are much more complex than what we thought in the past and can be studied in a single experiment. Because of that, fractionation and complementary strategies are required for its study. The MS analysis of complex samples may result in up to 100,000-peptide spectra that cannot be easily analyzed with standard procedures. Therefore, proteomics, more than other -omics, needs a dry lab, time, and an effort in data mining.As main conclusion, it can be stated that proteomics is in its beginnings. It is starting to make important contributions to a proper gene annotation, identification, and characterization of gene products or protein species and to the knowledge of living organisms, having also an enormous application potential to translational research. However, and despite its great potential, and as in any other experimental approach, it is far from being a Pandora's Box. In the case of plant research, the full potential of proteomics is quite far from being totally exploited, and second-, third-, and fourth-generation proteomics techniques are still of very limited use. Most of the plant proteomics papers so far published belong to the descriptive, subcellular, and comparative proteomics subgroup, mainly using a few experimental model systems-those whose genome has been sequenced-and being from a biological point of view quite descriptive and speculative. From now on we should put more emphasis on the study of posttranslational proteomics and interactomics, and move to targeted, hypothesis-driven approaches. Furthermore, and even more important, we should move to data validation through other -omics or classical biochemical strategies, in an attempt to get a deeper, real, and more accurate view and understanding of cell biology. In the modern Systems Biology concept, proteomics must be considered as a part of a global, multidisciplinary approach. Making biological sense of a proteomics experiment requires a proper experimental design, data validation, interpretation, and publication policy.
在这第一章导论中,旨在从方法论角度总结植物蛋白质组学的现状,重点关注基于质谱的策略。因此,本章主要面向初学者或那些试图进入该领域的人,而非在植物蛋白质组学研究方面有实际经验或长期研究历程的人。将简要评述从实验设计到数据分析的不同替代工作流程、方法、技术和方案,并交叉引用以前的专著和综述以及本书的其他章节。还将简要讨论处理蛋白质的难度以及该方法的优势、局限性和挑战。
蛋白质作为分子实体,以及整个细胞蛋白质组,比我们过去认为的要复杂得多,无法在单个实验中进行研究。因此,需要分级分离和互补策略来进行研究。对复杂样品的质谱分析可能会产生多达100,000个肽谱,用标准程序难以轻松分析。因此,与其他“组学”相比,蛋白质组学更需要虚拟实验室、时间以及数据挖掘方面的努力。
作为主要结论,可以说蛋白质组学尚处于起步阶段。它开始对正确的基因注释、基因产物或蛋白质种类的鉴定和表征以及对生物体的认识做出重要贡献,在转化研究方面也具有巨大的应用潜力。然而,尽管其潜力巨大,但与任何其他实验方法一样,它远非一个潘多拉魔盒。就植物研究而言,蛋白质组学的全部潜力远未得到充分利用,第二代、第三代和第四代蛋白质组学技术的应用仍然非常有限。到目前为止发表的大多数植物蛋白质组学论文属于描述性、亚细胞和比较蛋白质组学子组,主要使用一些实验模型系统——那些基因组已测序的系统——从生物学角度来看相当具有描述性和推测性。从现在起,我们应该更加重视翻译后蛋白质组学和相互作用组学的研究,并转向靶向的、假设驱动的方法。此外,甚至更重要的是,我们应该通过其他“组学”或经典生化策略进行数据验证,以试图对细胞生物学有更深入、真实和准确的认识与理解。在现代系统生物学概念中,蛋白质组学必须被视为全球多学科方法的一部分。要从生物学角度理解蛋白质组学实验,需要适当的实验设计、数据验证、解释和发表策略。