• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
GPAQ-R: development and psychometric properties of a version of the general practice assessment questionnaire for use for revalidation by general practitioners in the UK.GPAQ-R:英国全科医生再认证用一般实践评估问卷的修订版的开发和心理测量学特性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Oct 20;14:160. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-160.
2
The General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) - development and psychometric characteristics.全科医疗评估问卷(GPAQ)——编制与心理测量学特征
BMC Fam Pract. 2008 Feb 20;9:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-9-13.
3
The impact of general practitioner morale on patient satisfaction with care: a cross-sectional study.全科医生士气对患者护理满意度的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Sep 28;8:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-57.
4
How do Australian patients rate their general practitioner? A descriptive study using the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire.澳大利亚患者如何评价他们的全科医生?一项使用全科医疗评估问卷的描述性研究。
Med J Aust. 2008 Aug 18;189(4):215-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01986.x.
5
Development of the Japanese version of the general practice assessment questionnaire: measurement of patient experience and testing of data quality.日本版全科医疗评估问卷的开发:患者体验测量与数据质量测试
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Nov 28;19(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0873-8.
6
Reliability and validity of a Thai version of the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ).泰语版全科医疗评估问卷(GPAQ)的信度和效度
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Sep;89(9):1491-6.
7
A standardised and validated patient survey in primary care: introducing the New Zealand General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (NZGPAQ).初级保健中的标准化且经过验证的患者调查:介绍新西兰全科医疗评估问卷(NZGPAQ)。
N Z Med J. 2013 Apr 5;126(1372):47-54.
8
Duties of a doctor: UK doctors and good medical practice.医生的职责:英国医生与良好医疗实践
Qual Health Care. 2000 Mar;9(1):14-22. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.1.14.
9
Does Family Medicine training in Thailand affect patient satisfaction with primary care doctors?泰国的家庭医学培训是否会影响患者对初级保健医生的满意度?
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Mar 29;8:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-14.
10
Understanding high and low patient experience scores in primary care: analysis of patients' survey data for general practices and individual doctors.了解初级医疗中患者体验得分的高低:对全科医疗诊所和个体医生的患者调查数据进行分析。
BMJ. 2014 Nov 11;349:g6034. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6034.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of health-care professionals' weight status on patient satisfaction and recalled advice: a prospective cohort study.医护人员体重状况对患者满意度及回忆建议的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Feb 16;57:101855. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101855. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A cross-sectional study in Malang District, Indonesia.理解 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫:印度尼西亚玛琅地区的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 26;10:1030695. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1030695. eCollection 2022.
3
A systematic literature review of patient self-assessment instruments concerning quality of primary care in multiprofessional clinics.多专业诊所中初级保健质量的患者自我评价工具的系统文献回顾。
Fam Pract. 2022 Sep 24;39(5):951-963. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac007.
4
Recent research into healthcare professions regulation: a rapid evidence assessment.近期医疗专业人员监管的研究:快速证据评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 8;21(1):934. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06946-8.
5
Assessing Service Quality Dimensions and Their Effect on Patients Satisfaction in Bahrain Primary Healthcare Using a Modified Version of the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire.使用通用实践评估问卷的修改版评估巴林初级医疗保健中的服务质量维度及其对患者满意度的影响。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Dec 31;14:2541-2549. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S285440. eCollection 2020.
6
[Questionnaires of person centered care in primary care. A systematic review].[基层医疗中以患者为中心的护理调查问卷。系统评价]
Aten Primaria. 2020 Dec;52(10):738-749. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
7
Development of the Japanese version of the general practice assessment questionnaire: measurement of patient experience and testing of data quality.日本版全科医疗评估问卷的开发:患者体验测量与数据质量测试
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Nov 28;19(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0873-8.
8
Understanding high and low patient experience scores in primary care: analysis of patients' survey data for general practices and individual doctors.了解初级医疗中患者体验得分的高低:对全科医疗诊所和个体医生的患者调查数据进行分析。
BMJ. 2014 Nov 11;349:g6034. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6034.

本文引用的文献

1
Generalizability theory for the perplexed: a practical introduction and guide: AMEE Guide No. 68.通用化理论研究:实用入门与指导——AMEE 指南第 68 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(11):960-92. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.703791.
2
Multisource feedback in evaluating the performance of doctors: the example of the UK General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.多源反馈评价医生绩效:以英国医学总会患者和同事调查问卷为例。
Acad Med. 2012 Dec;87(12):1668-78. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182724cc0.
3
Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.多源反馈问卷在评估和再认证中的应用:英国普通实践中的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 May;62(598):e314-21. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X641429.
4
Factors associated with variability in the assessment of UK doctors' professionalism: analysis of survey results.与英国医生专业精神评估变异性相关的因素:调查结果分析。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 27;343:d6212. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6212.
5
Reliability of patient responses in pay for performance schemes: analysis of national General Practitioner Patient Survey data in England.绩效薪酬计划中患者反馈的可靠性:对英格兰全国全科医生患者调查数据的分析
BMJ. 2009 Sep 29;339:b3851. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3851.
6
Understanding why some ethnic minority patients evaluate medical care more negatively than white patients: a cross sectional analysis of a routine patient survey in English general practices.理解为何一些少数族裔患者对医疗服务的评价比白人患者更负面:一项针对英国全科医疗中常规患者调查的横断面分析
BMJ. 2009 Sep 16;339:b3450. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3450.
7
The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK--development and psychometric characteristics.英国国民医疗服务体系中用于初级医疗保健的全科医生患者调查问卷——开发与心理测量学特征
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Aug 22;10:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-57.
8
Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England.绩效薪酬对英格兰初级医疗服务质量的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 23;361(4):368-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0807651.
9
Factors associated with enablement in general practice: cross-sectional study using routinely-collected data.全科医疗中与赋能相关的因素:使用常规收集数据的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 May;58(550):346-52. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X280218.
10
The General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) - development and psychometric characteristics.全科医疗评估问卷(GPAQ)——编制与心理测量学特征
BMC Fam Pract. 2008 Feb 20;9:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-9-13.

GPAQ-R:英国全科医生再认证用一般实践评估问卷的修订版的开发和心理测量学特性。

GPAQ-R: development and psychometric properties of a version of the general practice assessment questionnaire for use for revalidation by general practitioners in the UK.

机构信息

Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Oct 20;14:160. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-160.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-14-160
PMID:24138508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3819733/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) has been widely used to assess patient experience in general practice in the UK since 2004. In 2013, new regulations were introduced by the General Medical Council (GMC) requiring UK doctors to undertake periodic revalidation, which includes assessment of patient experience for individual doctors. We describe the development of a new version of GPAQ - GPAQ-R which addresses the GMC's requirements for revalidation as well as additional NHS requirements for surveys that GPs may need to carry out in their own practices.

METHODS

Questionnaires were given out by doctors or practice staff after routine consultations in line with the guidance given by the General Medical Council for surveys to be used for revalidation. Data analysis and practice reports were provided independently.

RESULTS

Data were analysed for questionnaires from 7258 patients relating to 164 GPs in 29 general practices. Levels of missing data were generally low (typically 4.5-6%). The number of returned questionnaires required to achieve reliability of 0.7 were around 35 for individual doctor communication items and 29 for a composite score based on doctor communication items. This suggests that the responses to GPAQ-R had similar reliability to the GMC's own questionnaire and we recommend 30 completed GPAQ-R questionnaires are sufficient for revalidation purposes. However, where an initial screen raises concern, the survey might be repeated with 50 completed questionnaires in order to increase reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

GPAQ-R is a development of a well-established patient experience questionnaire used in general practice in the UK since 2004. This new version can be recommended for use in order to meet the UK General Medical Council's requirements for surveys to be used in revalidation of doctors. It also meets the needs of GPs to ask about patient experience relating to aspects of practice care that are not specific to individual general practitioners (e.g. receptionists, telephone access) which meet other survey requirements of the National Health Service in England. Use of GPAQ-R has the potential to reduce the number of surveys that GPs need to carry out in their practices to meet the various regulatory requirements which they face.

摘要

背景

自 2004 年以来,《全科医生评估问卷》(GPAQ)在英国被广泛用于评估全科医生的患者体验。2013 年,英国医学总会(GMC)出台了新规定,要求英国医生定期进行再认证,其中包括对个别医生的患者体验进行评估。我们描述了新版本 GPAQ-R 的开发情况,该版本满足了 GMC 对再认证的要求,以及英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)对全科医生在其诊所进行调查的额外要求。

方法

根据 GMC 对再认证调查的指导,在常规咨询后由医生或诊所工作人员发放问卷。数据分析和实践报告是独立进行的。

结果

共分析了来自 7258 名患者的问卷,涉及 29 家诊所的 164 名全科医生。数据缺失通常较低(通常为 4.5-6%)。为了达到 0.7 的可靠性,每个医生沟通项目需要大约 35 份问卷,而基于医生沟通项目的综合评分需要大约 29 份问卷。这表明 GPAQ-R 的反应与 GMC 自己的问卷具有相似的可靠性,我们建议为再认证目的完成 30 份完整的 GPAQ-R 问卷。然而,如果初步筛查引起关注,可能需要重复调查,完成 50 份问卷以提高可靠性。

结论

GPAQ-R 是英国自 2004 年以来用于全科实践的一种成熟的患者体验问卷的发展。新版本可以推荐用于满足英国医学总会对再认证医生使用调查的要求。它还满足了全科医生了解与实践护理方面相关的患者体验的需求,这些方面不仅限于个别全科医生(例如接待员、电话接入),并满足了英格兰 NHS 的其他调查要求。使用 GPAQ-R 有可能减少全科医生在实践中为满足他们面临的各种监管要求而进行的调查数量。