• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球触发工具显示,七分之一的患者在巴勒斯坦医院遭受伤害:启动战略安全计划面临的挑战。

The Global Trigger Tool shows that one out of seven patients suffers harm in Palestinian hospitals: challenges for launching a strategic safety plan.

机构信息

Health Services Research Group, School of Public Health, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 4th Floor, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Dec;25(6):640-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt066. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzt066
PMID:24141012
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate patient safety levels in Palestinian hospitals and to provide guidance for policymakers involved in safety improvement efforts.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of hospitalized patient records using the Global Trigger Tool.

SETTING

Two large hospitals in Palestine: a referral teaching hospital and a nonprofit, non-governmental hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 640 random records of discharged patients were reviewed by experienced nurses and physicians from the selected hospitals.

INTERVENTION

Assessment of adverse events.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of adverse events, their preventability and harm category. Descriptive statistics and Cohen kappa coefficients were calculated.

RESULTS

One out of seven patients (91 [14.2%]) suffered harm. Fifty-four (59.3%) of these events were preventable; 64 (70.4%) resulted in temporary harm, requiring prolonged hospitalization. Good reliability was achieved among the independent reviewers in identifying adverse events. The Global Trigger Tool showed that adverse events in Palestinian hospitals likely occur at a rate of 20 times higher than previously reported. Although reviewers reported that detecting adverse events was feasible, we identified conditions suggesting that the tool may be challenging to use in daily practice.

CONCLUSION

One out of seven patients suffers harm in Palestinian hospitals. Compromised safety represents serious problems for patients, hospitals and governments and should be a high priority public health issue. We argue that direct interventions should be launched immediately to improve safety. Additional costs associated with combating adverse events should be taken into consideration, especially in regions with limited resources, as in Palestine.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估巴勒斯坦医院的患者安全水平,并为参与安全改进工作的政策制定者提供指导。

设计

使用全球触发工具对住院患者记录进行回顾性审查。

地点

巴勒斯坦的两家大医院:一家转诊教学医院和一家非营利性非政府医院。

参与者

由来自选定医院的经验丰富的护士和医生对 640 名随机出院患者的记录进行了审查。

干预措施

评估不良事件。

主要观察指标

不良事件的发生率、可预防性和伤害类别。计算了描述性统计数据和 Cohen kappa 系数。

结果

每 7 名患者中就有 1 名(91 [14.2%])遭受伤害。其中 54 例(59.3%)事件是可预防的;64 例(70.4%)导致暂时伤害,需要延长住院时间。独立审查员在识别不良事件方面具有良好的可靠性。全球触发工具表明,巴勒斯坦医院的不良事件发生率可能比之前报告的高 20 倍。尽管审查员报告说检测不良事件是可行的,但我们发现了一些情况表明该工具在日常实践中可能具有挑战性。

结论

每 7 名患者中就有 1 名在巴勒斯坦医院遭受伤害。安全受损对患者、医院和政府来说都是严重的问题,应成为高度优先的公共卫生问题。我们认为,应立即发起直接干预措施以提高安全性。应考虑与应对不良事件相关的额外成本,特别是在资源有限的地区,如巴勒斯坦。

相似文献

1
The Global Trigger Tool shows that one out of seven patients suffers harm in Palestinian hospitals: challenges for launching a strategic safety plan.全球触发工具显示,七分之一的患者在巴勒斯坦医院遭受伤害:启动战略安全计划面临的挑战。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Dec;25(6):640-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt066. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
2
Measuring hospital adverse events: assessing inter-rater reliability and trigger performance of the Global Trigger Tool.测量医院不良事件:评估全球触发工具的评价者间可靠性和触发性能。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Aug;22(4):266-74. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq026. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
3
[Adverse events and preventable consequences: retrospective study in five large Italian hospitals].[不良事件与可预防后果:意大利五家大型医院的回顾性研究]
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 May-Aug;36(3-4):151-61.
4
Patient safety in developing countries: retrospective estimation of scale and nature of harm to patients in hospital.发展中国家的患者安全:对医院患者伤害的规模和性质的回顾性估计。
BMJ. 2012 Mar 13;344:e832. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e832.
5
Measuring adverse events and levels of harm in pediatric inpatients with the Global Trigger Tool.使用全球触发工具测量儿科住院患者的不良事件和伤害程度。
Pediatrics. 2012 Nov;130(5):e1206-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0179. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
6
The preliminary development and testing of a global trigger tool to detect error and patient harm in primary-care records.用于检测初级保健记录中的差错和患者伤害的全球触发工具的初步开发与测试。
Postgrad Med J. 2009 Apr;85(1002):176-80. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.075788.
7
Adverse events in the neonatal intensive care unit: development, testing, and findings of an NICU-focused trigger tool to identify harm in North American NICUs.新生儿重症监护病房的不良事件:一种以北美新生儿重症监护病房为重点、用于识别伤害的触发工具的开发、测试及结果
Pediatrics. 2006 Oct;118(4):1332-40. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0565.
8
Incidence of adverse events in Sweden during 2013-2016: a cohort study describing the implementation of a national trigger tool.2013 - 2016年瑞典不良事件的发生率:一项描述国家触发工具实施情况的队列研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 30;8(3):e020833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020833.
9
The morbidity and mortality conference as an adverse event surveillance tool in a paediatric intensive care unit.作为儿科重症监护病房不良事件监测工具的发病率和死亡率会议。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Nov;23(11):930-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003000. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
10
Is inter-rater reliability of Global Trigger Tool results altered when members of the review team are replaced?当审查团队成员被替换时,全球触发工具结果的评分者间信度会改变吗?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Sep;28(4):492-6. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw054. Epub 2016 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of hospital accreditation on nurses' perceptions of patient safety culture.医院认证对护士对患者安全文化认知的影响。
Hum Resour Health. 2024 May 28;22(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00920-1.
2
Establishing a trigger tool based on global trigger tools to identify adverse drug events in obstetric inpatients in China.建立基于全球触发工具的触发工具,以识别中国产科住院患者的药物不良事件。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 15;24(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10449-z.
3
Assessing the Feasibility and Effects of Introducing the USA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program on Clinical Outcomes and Cost in Saudi Arabia: An Observational Study.
评估引入美国国家外科质量改进计划对沙特阿拉伯临床结局和成本的可行性及影响:一项观察性研究。
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2020 Feb 11;3(1):14-21. doi: 10.4103/JQSH.JQSH_1_20. eCollection 2020 Feb.
4
Comparing rates of adverse events detected in incident reporting and the Global Trigger Tool: a systematic review.比较不良事件在不良事件报告和全球触发工具中检测到的发生率:系统评价。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Jul 25;35(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad056.
5
Palestinian Patients with Cancer at King Hussein Cancer Center.侯赛因国王癌症中心的巴勒斯坦癌症患者。
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 30;12:997492. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.997492. eCollection 2022.
6
Variation in detected adverse events using trigger tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用触发工具检测到的不良事件的变化:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0273800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273800. eCollection 2022.
7
Patient Safety Attitudes among Doctors and Nurses: Associations with Workload, Adverse Events, Experience.医生和护士的患者安全态度:与工作量、不良事件、经验的关联
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 27;10(4):631. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040631.
8
Adverse events in women giving birth in a labor ward: a retrospective record review study.分娩病房中分娩的妇女的不良事件:回顾性病历回顾研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 14;21(1):1093. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07109-5.
9
Applying the Global Trigger Tool in German Hospitals: A Pilot in Surgery and Neurosurgery.在德国医院应用全球触发工具:外科和神经外科的初步尝试。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Dec;16(4):e340-e351. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000576.
10
Undergraduate medical students' attitudes towards medical errors and patient safety: a multi-center cross-sectional study in the Gaza Strip, Palestine.巴勒斯坦加沙地带多中心横断面研究:医学生对医疗错误和患者安全的态度。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Nov 19;20(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02375-z.