Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences - CELLS, Hannover Medical School, Germany.
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e75995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075995. eCollection 2013.
Reporting guidelines (e.g. CONSORT) have been developed as tools to improve quality and reduce bias in reporting research findings. Trial registration has been recommended for countering selective publication. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) encourages the implementation of reporting guidelines and trial registration as uniform requirements (URM). For the last two decades, however, biased reporting and insufficient registration of clinical trials has been identified in several literature reviews and other investigations. No study has so far investigated the extent to which author instructions in psychiatry journals encourage following reporting guidelines and trial registration.
Psychiatry Journals were identified from the 2011 Journal Citation Report. Information given in the author instructions and during the submission procedure of all journals was assessed on whether major reporting guidelines, trial registration and the ICMJE's URM in general were mentioned and adherence recommended.
We included 123 psychiatry journals (English and German language) in our analysis. A minority recommend or require 1) following the URM (21%), 2) adherence to reporting guidelines such as CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE (23%, 7%, 4%), or 3) registration of clinical trials (34%). The subsample of the top-10 psychiatry journals (ranked by impact factor) provided much better but still improvable rates. For example, 70% of the top-10 psychiatry journals do not ask for the specific trial registration number.
Under the assumption that better reported and better registered clinical research that does not lack substantial information will improve the understanding, credibility, and unbiased translation of clinical research findings, several stakeholders including readers (physicians, patients), authors, reviewers, and editors might benefit from improved author instructions in psychiatry journals. A first step of improvement would consist in requiring adherence to the broadly accepted reporting guidelines and to trial registration.
报告指南(例如 CONSORT)已被开发为提高报告研究结果质量和减少偏倚的工具。为了应对选择性发表,已建议对试验进行注册。国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)鼓励实施报告指南和试验注册作为统一要求(URM)。然而,在过去的二十年中,一些文献综述和其他研究发现临床试验存在有偏报告和注册不足的问题。迄今为止,尚无研究调查精神病学杂志的作者指南在多大程度上鼓励遵循报告指南和试验注册。
从 2011 年期刊引文报告中确定了精神病学杂志。评估了所有期刊的作者指南和提交过程中的信息,以了解主要报告指南、试验注册和 ICMJE 的 URM 是否被提及,并建议遵守。
我们分析了 123 种精神病学杂志(英文和德文)。少数建议或要求 1)遵循 URM(21%)、2)遵循 CONSORT、PRISMA、STROBE 等报告指南(23%、7%、4%)或 3)注册临床试验(34%)。顶级 10 种精神病学杂志(按影响因子排名)的样本量提供了更好但仍可改进的比例。例如,70%的顶级 10 种精神病学杂志不要求特定的试验注册号码。
在假设更好报告和更好注册的临床试验不缺乏实质性信息将提高对临床研究结果的理解、可信度和公正翻译的前提下,包括读者(医生、患者)、作者、评论者和编辑在内的几个利益相关者可能会从精神病学杂志中改进的作者指南中受益。第一步的改进将包括要求遵守广泛接受的报告指南和试验注册。