School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 17;8(10):e76554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076554. eCollection 2013.
Depression debilitates the lives of millions and is projected to be the second leading disease burden worldwide by 2020. At the population level, the causes of depression are found in the everyday social and physical environments in which people live. Research has shown that men and women often experience neighbourhood environments differently and that these variations are often reflected in health outcomes. The current study examines whether social and environmental correlates of depression are similar in men and women. This study examines whether (i) there are gender differences in the association between neighbourhood disadvantage and depressive symptoms, and (ii) dimensions of social capital and cohesion mediate these associations. Data come from the Montreal Neighbourhood Networks and Healthy Aging Study, which consists of a cluster stratified sample of Montreal census tracts (n(ct) = 300) and individuals within those tracts (ni = 2707). Depressive symptoms and social capital were measured with a questionnaire. Neighbourhood disadvantage was measured at the census tract level using data from the 2006 Canada Census. Multilevel logistic regression stratified by gender and a three-step mediation analysis procedure were used. Final sample size for these analyses was 2574 adults. Depressive symptoms had a prevalence of 17.3% in the overall sample. Disadvantage was associated with depressive symptoms in women only (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.01-1.55). Perceived neighbourhood cohesion was shown to mediate the association of disadvantage and depressive symptoms in women (ab = 0.02; 95% CI = 0.003-0.04, p<0.05). Other socio-relational variables, specifically generalized trust and trust in neighbours were associated with depression in women but did not act as mediating variables. Health promotion initiatives meant to combat depression may wish to consider gender differences in the design and implementation of neighbourhood or peer-based programs.
抑郁症使数百万人的生活变得虚弱不堪,预计到 2020 年,它将成为全球第二大疾病负担。在人群层面上,抑郁症的原因存在于人们生活的日常社会和物理环境中。研究表明,男性和女性经常以不同的方式体验邻里环境,这些差异通常反映在健康结果中。本研究探讨了抑郁的社会和环境相关性在男性和女性中是否相似。本研究检验了以下两点:(i) 邻里劣势与抑郁症状之间的关联是否存在性别差异,以及 (ii) 社会资本和凝聚力的维度是否调节这些关联。数据来自蒙特利尔邻里网络与健康老龄化研究,该研究由蒙特利尔普查区的分层聚类样本(n(ct)=300)和这些普查区内的个体(ni=2707)组成。抑郁症状和社会资本通过问卷进行测量。邻里劣势使用 2006 年加拿大普查数据在普查区层面进行测量。使用分层性别多水平逻辑回归和三步骤中介分析程序进行分析。这些分析的最终样本量为 2574 名成年人。在整个样本中,抑郁症状的患病率为 17.3%。劣势仅与女性的抑郁症状相关(OR=1.25,95%CI=1.01-1.55)。感知邻里凝聚力被证明可以调节劣势与女性抑郁症状之间的关联(ab=0.02;95%CI=0.003-0.04,p<0.05)。其他社会关系变量,特别是一般信任和对邻居的信任,与女性的抑郁有关,但不作为中介变量。旨在对抗抑郁的健康促进计划可能希望考虑到设计和实施邻里或同伴为基础的项目时的性别差异。