Suppr超能文献

制定儿童弱视治疗问卷(CAT-Qol)描述性系统草案:一项混合方法研究。

Developing the draft descriptive system for the child amblyopia treatment questionnaire (CAT-Qol): a mixed methods study.

机构信息

Health Economics and Decision (HEDS), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Oct 22;11:174. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-174.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Amblyopia is a visual condition that occurs in childhood. Screening programmes exist within the United Kingdom (UK) to detect amblyopia, and once detected treatment is given.Existing patient reported outcome (PRO) measures for amblyopia do not meet current recommendations for the methods adopted during their development, or the way in which the instruments are administered. The overall aim of this study was to produce a self-complete PRO instrument for amblyopia for children aged 4-7 years that uses children's responses in the development phase. The study comprised a number of stages. This paper reports on the refinement of the descriptive system for the draft instrument (the Child Amblyopia Treatment Questionnaire, CAT-QoL) using qualitative and quantitative methods.

METHODS

The study consisted of three components. Children were asked to read, and complete the draft questionnaire as independently as possible. They were then asked about the questionnaire, and its format, in a cognitive debriefing exercise. Observations were made as to the child's ability to read the questionnaire, particular attention was made as to which individual words participants struggled to read. Children were also asked their opinion on the design layout of the questionnaire. Finally, some children were asked to complete a ranking task to help determine the order of the levels of the items as judged by the children. Mid-rank scoring and statistical level of agreement were calculated for the ranking exercise.

RESULTS

Thirty-two (n=32) participants completed a draft questionnaire; each of these underwent a cognitive de-briefing interview. Twenty-two (n=22) children completed the ranking exercise. Ten children did not understand the concept of ranking. The results of the qualitative phase (cognitive de-briefing interview) were used to modify the wording of items and layout of the instrument. Results of the ranking exercise were used to inform the order of the response levels for the items.

CONCLUSION

Responses of young children can be used in the development of PRO instruments. They are able to help inform the content, wording, and format of an instrument, ensuring good content and face validity. The results have been used to further refine the CAT-QoL, however further research is required to assess the psychometric properties of the instrument.

摘要

背景

弱视是一种发生在儿童时期的视觉疾病。英国(UK)有筛查计划来发现弱视,一旦发现,就会进行治疗。现有的弱视患者报告结局(PRO)测量方法不符合其开发过程中采用的方法或仪器管理方式的现行建议。本研究的总体目标是为 4-7 岁的儿童开发一种自我完成的弱视 PRO 工具,该工具在开发阶段使用儿童的反应。该研究包括多个阶段。本文报告了使用定性和定量方法对草案工具(儿童弱视治疗问卷,CAT-QoL)的描述性系统进行的改进。

方法

该研究由三个部分组成。要求儿童尽可能独立地阅读和完成草案问卷。然后,他们在认知剖析练习中被问到有关问卷及其格式的问题。观察儿童阅读问卷的能力,特别注意参与者难以阅读的个别单词。还要求儿童对问卷的设计布局发表意见。最后,要求一些儿童完成一项排序任务,以帮助确定儿童判断的项目水平的顺序。为排序练习计算了中排名得分和统计水平的一致性。

结果

32 名(n=32)参与者完成了一份草案问卷;每个参与者都进行了认知剖析访谈。22 名(n=22)儿童完成了排序练习。10 名儿童不理解排序的概念。定性阶段(认知剖析访谈)的结果用于修改项目的措辞和工具的布局。排序练习的结果用于确定项目响应水平的顺序。

结论

年幼儿童的反应可用于开发 PRO 工具。他们能够帮助提供有关工具内容、措辞和格式的信息,确保内容和表面效度良好。结果已用于进一步改进 CAT-QoL,但需要进一步研究来评估工具的心理测量特性。

相似文献

2
Refinement of the Child Amblyopia Treatment Questionnaire (CAT-QoL) using Rasch analysis.
Strabismus. 2019 Jun;27(2):66-77. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2019.1601743. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
3
Identifying potential themes for the Child Amblyopia Treatment Questionnaire.
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Aug;90(8):867-73. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318290cd7b.
4
Comparison of the CAT-QoL and PedsQL instruments in measuring quality of life in amblyopia treatment: preliminary results.
Strabismus. 2019 Sep;27(3):165-171. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2019.1618351. Epub 2019 May 23.
5
Amblyopia treatment and quality of life: the child's perspective on atropine versus patching.
Strabismus. 2019 Sep;27(3):156-164. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2019.1643894. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
8
Patient-reported outcome measures in amblyopia and strabismus: a systematic review.
Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Jul;101(4):460-484. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12553. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

6
Paediatric eye and vision research participation experiences: a systematic review.
Trials. 2023 Jan 28;24(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07021-1.
8
Development and Evaluation of the Quality of Life Scale for Children With Visual Impairments in China.
Front Pediatr. 2022 Mar 21;10:739296. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.739296. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying potential themes for the Child Amblyopia Treatment Questionnaire.
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Aug;90(8):867-73. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318290cd7b.
3
Amblyopia and quality of life: a systematic review.
Eye (Lond). 2011 Apr;25(4):403-13. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.4. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
4
Evaluating the burden of amblyopia treatment from the parent and child's perspective.
J AAPOS. 2010 Oct;14(5):389-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.07.009.
5
Health-related quality of life measures (HRQoL) in patients with amblyopia and strabismus: a systematic review.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;95(3):325-30. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.178889. Epub 2010 Aug 7.
7
Developing a descriptive system for a new preference-based measure of health-related quality of life for children.
Qual Life Res. 2009 Oct;18(8):1105-13. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9524-9. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
8
Further validation of the Amblyopia Treatment Index parental questionnaire.
J AAPOS. 2008 Dec;12(6):581-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.04.017. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
9
The Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire: English translation, validation, and subscales.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Feb;143(2):305-310. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.046. Epub 2006 Oct 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验