Department of Teaching and Learning, Florida International University Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine , USA.
J Sports Sci Med. 2013 Sep 1;12(3):475-80. eCollection 2013.
Exercise is commonly used as an intervention to increase caloric output and positively affect body composition. A major challenge is the low compliance often seen when the prescribed exercise is associated with high levels of exertion. Whole-body vibration (WBV) may allow increased caloric output with reduced effort; however, there is limited information concerning the effect of WBV on oxygen consumption (VO2). Therefore, this study assessed the synergistic effects of resistance training and WBV on VO2. We examined VO2 at different loads (0%, 20%, and 40% body weight (BW)) and vibration intensities (No vibration (NV), 35HZ, 2-3mm (35L), 50Hz, 57mm (50H)) in ten men (26.5 ± 5.1 years). Data were collected during different stages (rest, six 30s sets of squatting, and recovery). Repeated measures ANOVA showed a stage x load x vibration interaction. Post hoc analysis revealed no differences during rest; however, a significant vibration x load interaction occurred during exercise. Both 35L and 50H produced greater VO2 than NV at a moderate load of 20%BW. Although 40%BW produced greater VO2 than 20%BW or 0%BW using NV, no significant difference in VO2 was seen among vibratory conditions at 40%BW. Moreover, no significant differences were seen between 50H and 35L at 20%BW and NV at 40%BW. During recovery there was a main effect for load. Post hoc analyses revealed that VO2 at 40%BW was significantly higher than 20%BW or 0%BW, and 20%BW produced higher VO2 than no load. Minute-by-minute analysis revealed a significant impact on VO2 due to load but not to vibratory condition. We conclude that the synergistic effect of WBV and active squatting with a moderate load is as effective at increasing VO2 as doubling the external load during squatting without WBV. Key PointsSynchronous whole body vibration in conjunction with moderate external loading (app 20% BW) can increase oxygen consumption to the same extent as heavier loading (40% BW) during performance of the parallel squat.While the application of synchronous whole body vibration had no effect on recovery oxygen, under bot vibratory and non-vibratory conditions, the heavier the external load the greater the recovery oxygen consumption levels.Regardless of vibratory condition, during the squatting exercise bout 40% BW produced higher heart rates than 20%BW or 0% BW, and 20% BW produced higher heart rates than 0% BW.There were strong trends toward higher heart rates in both vibratory conditions (50 Hz, 5-6mm; 35 Hz, 2-3 mm) than in the non-vibratory condition regardless of external loading.
运动通常被用作增加热量输出和积极影响身体成分的干预措施。一个主要的挑战是,当规定的运动与高强度的运动相关联时,往往会出现低依从性。全身振动(WBV)可能允许以较低的努力增加热量输出;然而,关于 WBV 对耗氧量(VO2)的影响的信息有限。因此,本研究评估了抗阻训练和 WBV 对 VO2 的协同作用。我们检查了在不同负荷(0%、20%和 40%体重(BW))和不同振动强度(无振动(NV)、35HZ、2-3mm(35L)、50Hz、57mm(50H))下的 VO2。十名男性(26.5±5.1 岁)参与了这项研究。数据在不同阶段(休息、六组 30 秒深蹲和恢复)收集。重复测量方差分析显示了阶段 x 负荷 x 振动的相互作用。事后分析显示休息时无差异;然而,运动时出现了振动 x 负荷的显著相互作用。在中等负荷 20%BW 时,35L 和 50H 产生的 VO2 均大于 NV。尽管 40%BW 比 20%BW 或 0%BW 产生更大的 VO2,但在 40%BW 时,振动条件之间没有显著差异。此外,在 20%BW 和 NV 时,50H 和 35L 之间以及 40%BW 时没有显著差异。在恢复期间,负荷有主要影响。事后分析显示,40%BW 的 VO2 明显高于 20%BW 或 0%BW,20%BW 的 VO2 高于无负荷。每分钟的分析显示,负荷对 VO2 有显著影响,但振动条件没有影响。我们得出的结论是,WBV 和主动深蹲相结合,在进行平行深蹲时,中等负荷(约 20%BW)与不使用 WBV 时增加两倍外部负荷一样有效,可以增加 VO2。关键点同步全身振动与适度的外部负荷(约 20%BW)相结合,可以在执行平行深蹲时将耗氧量增加到与更重的负荷(40%BW)相同的程度。虽然同步全身振动对恢复氧没有影响,但在振动和非振动条件下,外部负荷越重,恢复时的耗氧量水平越高。无论振动条件如何,在深蹲运动过程中,40%BW 比 20%BW 或 0%BW 产生更高的心率,20%BW 比 0%BW 产生更高的心率。在振动条件下(50Hz,5-6mm;35Hz,2-3mm),无论外部负荷如何,心率都明显高于非振动条件。