Thekkinkattil Dinesh Kumar, Salhab Mohammed, McManus Penelope Louise
From the Department of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, East Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Apr;74(4):397-402. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182a6adfc.
Lipomodeling is gaining popularity and has been widely used in various settings of reconstructive breast surgery. Implant-assisted latissimus dorsi (LD) flap reconstruction of breast is a popular method among the reconstructive surgeons. When this type of reconstruction is met with complications such as infection and capsular contracture, it necessitates removal of implants and patients are left with very limited options of reconstructions. We aim to assess the feasibility of lipomodeling in this setting.Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database of 10 patients who underwent lipomodeling to correct the volume deficit after implant removal in patients with implant-assisted LD flaps was carried out. A custom-made questionnaire using a 4-point Likert scale and a visual analog scale was used to assess the patient-reported outcomes. Patients were discharged from care after completion of treatment and were followed up by questionnaire. First questionnaire was sent to assess satisfaction at medium term and the second questionnaire was to assess satisfaction in the longer term.Mean number of sessions were 3 (range, 2-4) and mean duration of treatment was 14 months. Mean duration of initial follow-up was 15 months (range, 3-25 months) and that of longer follow-up was 40 months (range, 19-60 months). Variable amount of fat was harvested and transferred during different sessions. Patients were happy to undergo multiple sessions of fat transfer. No major complications were observed in our series and overall satisfaction was high with a mean score of 9.3 (range, 8-10) in the longer term. Persistence of higher satisfaction during a longer period is reassuring as one of the concerns regarding fat transfer is the unpredictable resorption rate.Lipomodeling is a useful feasible option to replace implant volume in patients with complicated implant-assisted LD reconstruction. Multiple sessions of lipomodeling seem to be acceptable to patients. This technique was associated with negligible complications and high patient satisfaction was maintained during longer periods of follow-up.
脂肪塑形正日益受到欢迎,并已广泛应用于各种乳房重建手术中。植入物辅助的背阔肌(LD)皮瓣乳房重建是重建外科医生中常用的方法。当这种重建出现感染和包膜挛缩等并发症时,就需要取出植入物,而患者的重建选择非常有限。我们旨在评估在这种情况下脂肪塑形的可行性。
对10例接受脂肪塑形以纠正植入物辅助LD皮瓣患者取出植入物后的体积缺损的患者的前瞻性维护数据库进行回顾性分析。使用4点李克特量表和视觉模拟量表的定制问卷来评估患者报告的结果。患者在完成治疗后出院,并通过问卷进行随访。第一份问卷用于评估中期满意度,第二份问卷用于评估长期满意度。
平均疗程数为3次(范围为2 - 4次),平均治疗持续时间为14个月。初始随访的平均持续时间为15个月(范围为3 - 25个月),长期随访的平均持续时间为40个月(范围为19 - 60个月)。在不同疗程中采集和转移了不同量的脂肪。患者乐意接受多次脂肪转移。我们的系列中未观察到重大并发症,长期总体满意度较高,平均评分为9.3(范围为8 - 10)。长期保持较高的满意度令人放心,因为脂肪转移的一个担忧是不可预测的吸收率。
脂肪塑形是一种有用的可行选择,可替代复杂的植入物辅助LD重建患者的植入物体积。多次脂肪塑形似乎为患者所接受。该技术并发症可忽略不计,并且在较长时间的随访中保持了较高的患者满意度。