Medical School, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad, Serbia.
J Sports Sci Med. 2010 Jun 1;9(2):176-82. eCollection 2010.
The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of three different body positions on HRV measures following short-term submaximal exercise. Thirty young healthy males performed submaximal cycling for five minutes on three different occasions. Measures of HRV were obtained from 5-min R to R wave intervals before the exercise (baseline) and during the last five minutes of a 15 min recovery (post-exercise) in three different body positions (seated, supine, supine with elevated legs). Measures of the mean RR normal-to-normal intervals (RRNN), the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN), the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) and the low-frequency (LF) and the high-frequency (HF) spectral power were analyzed. Post-exercise RRNN, RMSSD were significantly higher in the two supine positions (p < 0. 01) compared with seated body position. Post-exercise ln LF was significantly lower in the supine position with elevated legs than in the seated body position (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found among the three different body positions for post-exercise ln HF (p > 0.05). Post-exercise time domain measures of HRV (RRNN, SDNN, RMSSD) were significantly lower compared with baseline values (p < 0.01) regardless body position. Post-exercise ln LF and ln HF in all three positions remained significantly reduced during recovery compared to baseline values (p < 0.01). The present study suggests that 15 minutes following short-term submaximal exercise most of the time and frequency domain HRV measures have not returned to pre-exercise values. Modifications in autonomic cardiac regulation induced by body posture present at rest remained after exercise, but the post-exercise differences among the three positions did not resemble the ones established at rest. Key pointsWhether different body positions may enhance post-exercise recovery of autonomic regulation remains unclear.The absence of restoration of HRV measures after 15 minutes of recovery favor the existence of modifying effects of exercise on mechanisms underlying heart regulation.On the basis of discrepancies in HRV measures in different body positions pre- and post-exercise we argue that the pace of recovery of cardiac autonomic regulation is dependent on body posture.
本研究旨在评估三种不同体位对短期亚极量运动后心率变异性(HRV)指标的影响。三十名年轻健康男性在三种不同体位(坐位、仰卧位、仰卧位抬高腿部)下进行了 5 分钟的亚极量踏车运动。在运动前(基础值)和运动后 15 分钟恢复的最后 5 分钟(运动后)期间,从 5 分钟 R 到 R 波间隔获得 HRV 指标。分析了平均 RR 正常到正常间隔(RRNN)、正常到正常间隔标准差(SDNN)、连续差值均方根(RMSSD)和低频(LF)和高频(HF)频谱功率的指标。与坐位体位相比,两种仰卧位体位的运动后 RRNN 和 RMSSD 显著升高(p < 0.01)。与坐位体位相比,仰卧位抬高腿部体位的运动后 lnLF 显著降低(p < 0.05)。在三种不同体位中,运动后 lnHF 无显著差异(p > 0.05)。无论体位如何,运动后 HRV 的时域指标(RRNN、SDNN、RMSSD)均显著低于基础值(p < 0.01)。在恢复期间,所有三种体位的运动后 lnLF 和 lnHF 与基础值相比仍显著降低(p < 0.01)。本研究表明,在短期亚极量运动后 15 分钟内,大多数时间和频域 HRV 指标尚未恢复到运动前的值。在休息时体位引起的自主心脏调节的改变在运动后仍然存在,但三种体位之间的运动后差异与休息时建立的差异不同。要点
不同体位是否可以促进自主调节的运动后恢复尚不清楚。
在 15 分钟的恢复后,HRV 指标仍未恢复,这有利于运动对心脏调节机制产生的改变作用。
基于运动前和运动后不同体位的 HRV 指标的差异,我们认为心脏自主调节恢复的速度取决于体位。