Suppr超能文献

精英运动员典型的有氧适能水平与骑行运动中更快的 VO2 动力学无关。

Aerobic Fitness Level Typical of Elite Athletes is not Associated With Even Faster VO2 Kinetics During Cycling Exercise.

机构信息

Human Performance Laboratory , Rio Claro S.P., Brasil.

出版信息

J Sports Sci Med. 2008 Mar 1;7(1):132-8. eCollection 2008.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to address the question if the VO2 kinetics is further improved as the aerobic training status increases from trained to elite level athletes. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), work-rate associated to VO2max (IVO2max) and VO2 kinetics of moderate (Mod) and maximal exercise (Max) were determined in fifty- five subjects. Then, they were assigned into three groups: low (LF), intermediate (IF) and high (HF) aerobic fitness level. In average, the VO2max of LF, IF and HF groups were, respectively, 36.0 ± 3.1, 51.1 ± 4.5 and 68.1 ± 3.9 ml·kg·min(-1) (p ≤ 0.05 among each other). VO2 kinetics mean response time of both exercise intensities were significantly faster (p ≤ 0.05) in HF (Mod, 27.5 ± 5.5 s; Max, 32.6 ± 8.3 s) and IF (Mod, 25.0 ± 3.1 s; Max, 42.6 ± 10.4 s) when compared to LF (Mod, 35.7 ± 7.9 s; Max: 57.8 ± 17.8 s). We can conclude that VO2 kinetics is improved as the fitness level is increased from low to intermediate but not further improved as the aerobic fitness level increases from intermediate to high. Key pointsCurrently, it is reasonable to believe that the rate-limiting step of VO2 kinetics depends on exercise intensity.The well known physiological adaptations induced by endurance training are likely the most extreme means to overcome rate-limiting steps determining VO2 kinetics across exercise intensities.However, exercise adaptation leading individuals to the high-end of aerobic fitness level range (VO2max > 65 ml.kg.min-1) is not able to further improve VO2 kinetics during both, moderate and maximal intensity exercise.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨 VO2 动力学是否随着运动员从训练有素的水平向精英水平的提升而进一步改善。在 55 名受试者中,确定了最大摄氧量(VO2max)、与 VO2max 相关的工作率(IVO2max)以及中等强度(Mod)和最大强度(Max)运动的 VO2 动力学。然后,他们被分为三个组:低(LF)、中(IF)和高(HF)有氧健身水平。平均而言,LF、IF 和 HF 组的 VO2max 分别为 36.0 ± 3.1、51.1 ± 4.5 和 68.1 ± 3.9 ml·kg·min(-1)(彼此之间的差异均为 p ≤ 0.05)。在 HF(Mod,27.5 ± 5.5 s;Max,32.6 ± 8.3 s)和 IF(Mod,25.0 ± 3.1 s;Max,42.6 ± 10.4 s)中,两种运动强度的 VO2 动力学平均反应时间均明显加快(p ≤ 0.05)与 LF(Mod,35.7 ± 7.9 s;Max:57.8 ± 17.8 s)相比。我们可以得出结论,随着从低到中健身水平的提高,VO2 动力学得到改善,但从中等到高有氧健身水平的提高,VO2 动力学并没有进一步改善。要点目前,有理由相信 VO2 动力学的限速步骤取决于运动强度。耐力训练引起的众所周知的生理适应可能是克服决定运动强度范围内 VO2 动力学的限速步骤的最极端手段。然而,使个体达到有氧健身水平范围上限(VO2max > 65 ml.kg.min-1)的运动适应并不能进一步改善中等强度和最大强度运动时的 VO2 动力学。

相似文献

2
Effects of aerobic fitness on oxygen uptake kinetics in heavy intensity swimming.有氧适能对大强度游泳摄氧量动力学的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 May;112(5):1689-97. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2126-6. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
6
Applied physiology of triathlon.铁人三项运动的应用生理学
Sports Med. 1995 Apr;19(4):251-67. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199519040-00003.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验