Suppr超能文献

使用史密斯机和自由重量器械进行卧推和深蹲练习时肌肉力量产生的比较。

Comparison of muscle force production using the Smith machine and free weights for bench press and squat exercises.

作者信息

Cotterman Michael L, Darby Lynn A, Skelly William A

机构信息

Department of Athletics, Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa 50311, USA.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Feb;19(1):169-76. doi: 10.1519/14433.1.

Abstract

The Smith machine (SM) (vertical motion of bar on fixed path; fixed-form exercise) and free weights (FWs) (free-form path) are commonly used strength training modes. Exercisers may need to alternate between types of equipment, depending on testing, training, rehabilitation, and/or the exercisers' goals. The purposes of this study were to compare muscle force production for SM and FWs using a 1 repetition maximum (1RM) for the parallel back squat and supine bench press exercises and to predict the 1RM for one mode from 1RM on the other mode. Men (n = 16) and women (n = 16) alternately completed 1RM testing for squat and bench press using SM and FWs. Analyses of variance (type of equipment x sex) and linear regression models were calculated. A significant difference was found between bench press and squat 1RMs for each mode of equipment for all participants. The squat 1RM was greater for the SM than the FWs; conversely, the bench 1RM was greater for FWs than the SM. When sex was considered, bench 1RM for FWs was greater than SM for men and women. The squat 1RM was greater for SM than FWs for women only. The 1RM on one mode of equipment was the best predictor of 1RM for the other mode. For both sexes, the equation SM bench 1RM (in kilograms) = -6.76 + 0.95 (FW bench 1RM) can be used. For women only, SM squat 1RM (in kilograms) = 28.3 + 0.73 (FW squat 1RM). These findings provide equations for converting between SM and FW equipment for training.

摘要

史密斯机(SM)(杠铃在固定路径上垂直运动;固定形式训练)和自由重量器械(FWs)(自由运动路径)是常用的力量训练方式。根据测试、训练、康复和/或锻炼者的目标,锻炼者可能需要在不同类型的器械之间交替使用。本研究的目的是比较在进行平行后蹲和仰卧推举练习时,使用1次最大重复量(1RM)的史密斯机和自由重量器械的肌肉力量产生情况,并根据一种器械的1RM预测另一种器械的1RM。男性(n = 16)和女性(n = 16)交替使用史密斯机和自由重量器械完成深蹲和卧推的1RM测试。计算方差分析(器械类型×性别)和线性回归模型。所有参与者在每种器械模式下的卧推和深蹲1RM之间均存在显著差异。史密斯机的深蹲1RM大于自由重量器械;相反,自由重量器械的卧推1RM大于史密斯机。考虑性别因素时,自由重量器械的卧推1RM对男性和女性来说都大于史密斯机。仅对女性而言,史密斯机的深蹲1RM大于自由重量器械。一种器械模式下的1RM是另一种器械模式下1RM的最佳预测指标。对于男女两性,均可使用公式史密斯机卧推1RM(千克)= -6.76 + 0.95(自由重量器械卧推1RM)。仅对女性而言,史密斯机深蹲1RM(千克)= 28.3 + 0.73(自由重量器械深蹲1RM)。这些研究结果提供了在史密斯机和自由重量器械训练之间进行转换的公式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验