• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

金属对金属髋关节表面置换与 28 毫米直径金属对金属全髋关节置换的比较:一项随访 6 至 9 年的随机研究。

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up.

机构信息

Hôpital Maisonneuve - Rosemont, 5415 Boul L'Assomption, Montréal, Québec H1T 2M4, Canada.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11):1464-73. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.31604.

DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.31604
PMID:24151264
Abstract

A total of 219 hips in 192 patients aged between 18 and 65 years were randomised to 28-mm metal-on-metal uncemented total hip replacements (THRs, 107 hips) or hybrid hip resurfacing (HR, 112 hips). At a mean follow-up of eight years (6.6 to 9.3) there was no significant difference between the THR and HR groups regarding rate of revision (4.0% (4 of 99) vs 5.8% (6 of 104), p = 0.569) or re-operation rates without revision (5.1% (5 of 99) vs 2.9% (3 of 104), p = 0.428). In the THR group one recurrent dislocation, two late deep infections and one peri-prosthetic fracture required revision, whereas in the HR group five patients underwent revision for femoral head loosening and one for adverse reaction to metal debris. The mean University of California, Los Angeles activity scores were significantly higher in HR (7.5 (sd 1.7) vs 6.9 (sd 1.7), p = 0.035), but similar mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores were obtained (5.8 (sd 9.5) in HR vs 5.1 (sd 8.9) in THR, p = 0.615) at the last follow-up. Osteolysis was found in 30 of 81 THR patients (37.4%), mostly in the proximal femur, compared with two of 83 HR patients (2.4%) (p < 0.001). At five years the mean metal ion levels were < 2.5 μg/l for cobalt and chromium in both groups; only titanium was significantly higher in the HR group (p = 0.001). Although revision rates and functional scores were similar in both groups at mid-term, long-term survival analysis is necessary to determine whether one procedure is more advantageous than the other.

摘要

共有 192 名年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间的患者的 219 髋被随机分为 28 毫米金属对金属非骨水泥全髋关节置换术(THR,107 髋)或混合髋关节表面置换术(HR,112 髋)。平均随访 8 年(6.6 至 9.3 年)后,THR 组和 HR 组的翻修率(4.0%(4/99)与 5.8%(6/104),p=0.569)或无需翻修的再手术率(5.1%(5/99)与 2.9%(3/104),p=0.428)无显著差异。THR 组中 1 例复发性脱位、2 例晚期深部感染和 1 例假体周围骨折需要翻修,而 HR 组中 5 例患者因股骨头松动而行翻修,1 例因金属碎屑不良反应而行翻修。HR 组的加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校活动评分(7.5(sd 1.7))显著高于 THR 组(6.9(sd 1.7),p=0.035),但获得的西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数评分(HR 组 5.8(sd 9.5)与 THR 组 5.1(sd 8.9),p=0.615)相似。在最后一次随访时,81 例 THR 患者中有 30 例(37.4%)发现溶骨性病变,主要发生在股骨近端,而 83 例 HR 患者中有 2 例(2.4%)(p<0.001)。在 5 年时,两组钴和铬的金属离子水平均<2.5μg/l;只有 HR 组的钛明显更高(p=0.001)。虽然两组在中期的翻修率和功能评分相似,但需要进行长期生存分析以确定一种手术是否比另一种更有优势。

相似文献

1
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up.金属对金属髋关节表面置换与 28 毫米直径金属对金属全髋关节置换的比较:一项随访 6 至 9 年的随机研究。
Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11):1464-73. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.31604.
2
Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?使用关节表面置换假体进行髋关节表面置换术后,女性进行翻修手术的风险是否更高?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2257-65. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4860-x. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
3
A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.活跃年轻患者中杂交髋关节置换术与伯明翰髋关节表面置换术的中期比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Feb;93(2):158-63. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25625.
4
Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.金属对金属髋关节表面置换术的临床和影像学结果:至少十年随访。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 17;92(16):2663-71. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01715.
5
A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up.一项前瞻性比较研究:髋关节表面置换术与大直径头金属对金属全髋关节置换术在年轻患者中的应用-至少 5 年随访。
Int Orthop. 2018 Oct;42(10):2323-2327. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3819-9. Epub 2018 Feb 18.
6
Metal on Metal Hip Resurfacing in Patients 45 Years of Age and Younger at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.45 岁及以下患者的金属对金属髋关节表面置换术:至少 5 年的随访结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Oct;33(10):3196-3200. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.041. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
7
Total hip arthroplasty survival in femoral head avascular necrosis versus primary hip osteoarthritis: Case-control study with a mean 10-year follow-up after anatomical cementless metal-on-metal 28-mm replacement.股骨头缺血性坏死与原发性髋关节骨关节炎患者全髋关节置换术的生存率:对采用解剖型非骨水泥28毫米金属对金属置换术治疗的患者进行平均10年随访的病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Dec;102(8):1029-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.08.021. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
8
A prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing ceramic-on-metal and metal-on-metal bearing surfaces in total hip replacement.一项比较全髋关节置换中陶瓷对金属和金属对金属关节面的前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Nov;94(11):1462-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.29343.
9
Hip Resurfacing Compared with 28-mm Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Replacement: A Randomized Study with 15 Years of Follow-up.髋关节表面置换与 28mm 金属对金属全髋关节置换的比较:一项随访 15 年的随机研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Nov 4;102(Suppl 2):80-90. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00030.
10
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: comparison of three designs from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.髋关节表面置换术与大直径头金属对金属全髋关节置换术的比较:芬兰关节置换登记处三种设计的比较。
Scand J Surg. 2014 Mar;103(1):54-9. doi: 10.1177/1457496913495345. Epub 2013 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The Choice of Hip Arthroplasty: HRA or THA? Revealed by Meta-Analysis.髋关节置换术的选择:髋关节表面置换术还是全髋关节置换术?荟萃分析揭示
Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun;17(6):1577-1588. doi: 10.1111/os.70019. Epub 2025 Mar 16.
2
Prosthetic Metals: Release, Metabolism and Toxicity.人工假体金属:释放、代谢与毒性。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2024 Jun 5;19:5245-5267. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S459255. eCollection 2024.
3
Effect of low dissolved oxygen concentration on the defects and composition of regenerated passive film of Ti-6Al-4V alloy under continuous wear.
低溶解氧浓度对Ti-6Al-4V合金在持续磨损下再生钝化膜缺陷及成分的影响
RSC Adv. 2023 Jul 5;13(29):20135-20149. doi: 10.1039/d3ra03865c. eCollection 2023 Jun 29.
4
Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty Is a Safe and Effective Alternative to Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.髋关节表面置换术是年轻患者全髋关节置换术的一种安全有效的替代方案:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 7;12(6):2093. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062093.
5
Complications and mid to long term outcomes for hip resurfacing versus total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.髋关节表面置换与全髋关节置换的并发症及中远期疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Jul;33(5):1495-1504. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03361-5. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
6
Fragility Index as a Measure of Randomized Clinical Trial Quality in Adult Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.脆弱性指数作为成人重建随机临床试验质量的衡量指标:一项系统评价。
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Oct 11;11:239-251. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.08.018. eCollection 2021 Oct.
7
Comparison of hip function and quality of life of total hip arthroplasty and resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of young patients with arthritis of the hip joint at 5 years.全髋关节置换术与表面置换术治疗年轻髋关节关节炎患者5年时髋关节功能及生活质量的比较
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 12;8(3):e018849. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018849.
8
Comparison of metal ion concentrations and implant survival after total hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal versus metal-on-polyethylene articulations.全髋关节置换术中金属对金属与金属对聚乙烯关节置换后金属离子浓度及植入物生存率的比较。
Acta Orthop. 2017 Oct;88(5):490-495. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1350370. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
9
Poor 10-year survivorship of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.髋关节表面置换术10年生存率低。
Acta Orthop. 2016 Dec;87(6):554-559. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1246316. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
10
Prevalence of Failure due to Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in Modern, Medium and Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements--The Effect of Novel Screening Methods: Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis.现代中、大直径金属对金属髋关节置换术中金属碎屑不良反应导致的失败发生率——新型筛查方法的影响:系统评价与Meta回归分析
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 1;11(3):e0147872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147872. eCollection 2016.