Nottingham Sara, Henning Jolene
Chapman University, Orange, CA.
J Athl Train. 2014 Jan-Feb;49(1):58-67. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.6.15. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
Approved Clinical Instructors (ACIs; now known as preceptors) are expected to provide feedback to athletic training students (ATSs) during clinical education experiences. Researchers in other fields have found that clinical instructors and students often have different perceptions of actual and ideal feedback and that several factors may influence the feedback exchanges between instructors and students. However, understanding of these issues in athletic training education is minimal.
To investigate the current characteristics and perceptions of and the influences on feedback exchanges between ATSs and ACIs.
Qualitative study.
One entry-level master's degree program accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education.
Four ACIs and 4 second-year ATSs.
Individual, semistructured interviews were conducted with participants and integrated with field notes and observations for analysis. We used the constant comparative approach to inductively analyze data and develop codes and categories. Member checking, triangulation, and peer debriefing were used to promote trustworthiness of the study.
Participants described that feedback plays an important role in clinical education and has several purposes related to improving performance. The ACIs and ATSs also discussed several preferred characteristics of feedback. Participants identified 4 main influences on their feedback exchanges, including the ACI, the ATS, personalities, and the learning environment.
The ACIs and ATSs had similar perceptions of ideal feedback in addition to the actual feedback that was provided during their clinical education experiences. Most of the preferences for feedback were aligned with recommendations in the literature, suggesting that existing research findings are applicable to athletic training clinical education. Several factors influenced the feedback exchanges between ACIs and ATSs, which clinical education coordinators should consider when selecting clinical sites and training ACIs.
经批准的临床指导教师(ACIs,现称为带教老师)应在运动训练学生(ATSs)的临床教育经历中提供反馈。其他领域的研究人员发现,临床指导教师和学生对实际反馈和理想反馈的看法往往不同,并且有几个因素可能会影响指导教师和学生之间的反馈交流。然而,在运动训练教育中对这些问题的了解很少。
调查ATSs和ACIs之间反馈交流的当前特征、看法及其影响因素。
定性研究。
一个由运动训练教育认证委员会认证的入门级硕士学位课程。
四名ACIs和四名二年级ATSs。
对参与者进行了个人半结构化访谈,并与实地记录和观察结果相结合进行分析。我们使用持续比较法对数据进行归纳分析,并制定编码和类别。采用成员核对、三角验证和同行汇报来提高研究的可信度。
参与者表示,反馈在临床教育中起着重要作用,并且有几个与提高表现相关的目的。ACIs和ATSs还讨论了反馈的几个理想特征。参与者确定了对他们反馈交流的4个主要影响因素,包括ACI、ATS、个性和学习环境。
除了在临床教育经历中提供的实际反馈外,ACIs和ATSs对理想反馈有相似的看法。大多数反馈偏好与文献中的建议一致,这表明现有研究结果适用于运动训练临床教育。几个因素影响了ACIs和ATSs之间的反馈交流,临床教育协调员在选择临床地点和培训ACIs时应予以考虑。