• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

0-16岁儿童白细胞自动细胞化学分类计数的参考值:与瑞氏染色涂片手工计数结果的比较

Reference values for automated cytochemical differential count of leukocytes in children 0-16 years old: comparison with manually obtained counts from Wright-stained smears.

作者信息

Cranendonk E, van Gennip A H, Abeling N G, Behrendt H, Hart A A

出版信息

J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1985 Oct;23(10):663-7. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1985.23.10.663.

DOI:10.1515/cclm.1985.23.10.663
PMID:2415666
Abstract

Reference values for the differential leukocyte count using an automated cytochemical method (Hemalog D) were determined in 1216 healthy children aged 0-16 years. Log-normal distributions for the absolute counts of all the separate cell types and for the total leukocyte counts were determined. For the relative values, a log-normal distribution for the eosinophils and basophils was also established. The Hemalog D gives narrower limits compared with the manual count, but the differences between the two methods are smaller than expected. It appears that the lower limit of the separate cell types is not zero.

摘要

采用自动细胞化学方法(Hemalog D)测定了1216名0至16岁健康儿童的白细胞分类计数参考值。确定了所有单独细胞类型的绝对计数以及总白细胞计数的对数正态分布。对于相对值,还建立了嗜酸性粒细胞和嗜碱性粒细胞的对数正态分布。与手工计数相比,Hemalog D给出的界限更窄,但两种方法之间的差异小于预期。似乎单独细胞类型的下限不为零。

相似文献

1
Reference values for automated cytochemical differential count of leukocytes in children 0-16 years old: comparison with manually obtained counts from Wright-stained smears.0-16岁儿童白细胞自动细胞化学分类计数的参考值:与瑞氏染色涂片手工计数结果的比较
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1985 Oct;23(10):663-7. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1985.23.10.663.
2
The Hemalog D white cell differential system.Hemalog D白细胞分类系统。
J Histochem Cytochem. 1974 Jul;22(7):711-24. doi: 10.1177/22.7.711.
3
Normal laboratory values for differential white cell counts established by manual and automated cytochemical methods (Hemalog D-TM).通过手工和自动细胞化学方法(Hemalog D-TM)建立的白细胞分类计数的正常实验室值。
J Clin Pathol. 1974 Jan;27(1):55-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.27.1.55.
4
Evaluation of the accuracy of the diff3/50 with a cell by cell comparison.通过逐个细胞比较来评估diff3/50的准确性。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Sep;80(3):333-41. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/80.3.333.
5
Evaluation of the monocyte channel of the Hemalog-D: correlation with visual microscopy.血液分析仪-D单核细胞通道的评估:与镜检的相关性
Am J Med Technol. 1981 Nov;47(11):923-31.
6
Automated classification of normal and abnormal leukocytes.正常和异常白细胞的自动分类
J Histochem Cytochem. 1974 Jul;22(7):697-706. doi: 10.1177/22.7.697.
7
Automated differential leucocyte counters: an evaluation of the Hemalog D and A comparison with the Hematrak. I. Principles of operation; reproducibility and accuracy on normal blood samples.自动白细胞分类计数器:Hemalog D的评估及与Hematrak的比较。I. 操作原理;对正常血液样本的重复性和准确性
Pathology. 1980 Jan;12(1):83-100. doi: 10.3109/00313028009060057.
8
The white blood cell differential. Evaluation of rapid impression scanning versus the routine manual count.白细胞分类计数。快速印象扫描与常规手工计数的评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1987 May;87(5):628-32. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/87.5.628.
9
Leucocyte counts in the healthy English Thoroughbred in training.训练中健康英国纯种马的白细胞计数
Equine Vet J. 1984 May;16(3):207-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1984.tb01907.x.
10
Short-term biological variation of differential count in healthy subjects in a South Asian population.南亚人群健康受试者白细胞分类计数的短期生物学变异
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2020 Dec;80(8):654-658. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2020.1827290. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
An Approach to the Evaluation of Persistent Hypereosinophilia in Pediatric Patients.小儿持续性嗜酸性粒细胞增多的评估方法。
Front Immunol. 2018 Sep 3;9:1944. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01944. eCollection 2018.
2
Eosinophils. Assays and interpretation.嗜酸性粒细胞。检测与解读。
Clin Rev Allergy. 1988 Summer;6(2):163-90.