Wolf M E, Held V E, Hennerici M G
Department of Neurology, UniversitätsMedizin Mannheim UMM, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Front Neurol Neurosci. 2014;33:41-68. doi: 10.1159/000351891. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
The risk of recurrent ischemic stroke after a transient ischemic attack (TIA) has been reported to be 5-10%, and is elevated especially within the first days after the index event. Since TIA primarily has a good outcome without persisting new deficits, interest has been growing to predict stroke recurrence after TIA. This has led to the development of scores, initially for long-term prognosis such as the Stroke Prognosis Instrument (SPI) or the Hankey score, which both have shown a good predictive value at 1 or 2 years after TIA. Risk factors such as age, hypertension or cardiovascular disease were integrated in these systems. Since the early risk prediction for stroke in patients presenting within 24 h after onset of symptoms became clinically more and more relevant in emergency stroke units, the ABCD score (for the predictive factors Age, Blood pressure, Clinical symptoms, Duration of symptoms) was developed. Validation was promising, and hence further scores were developed, which entailed a large number of studies trying to validate these systems or to improve them (e.g. ABCD(2), ABCD(2)I, ABCD(3), ABCD(3)I, CIP model, ASPIRE approach, ABCDE+ etc.). The main approaches were to include imaging results (such as DWI positivity) or etiologic considerations (e.g. carotid stenosis or atrial fibrillation). However, these new scores necessitate an extensive diagnostic workup, and therefore can only be used in large stroke centers. Currently, for acute TIA management, the use of ABCD(2) is recommended in several guidelines.
据报道,短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)后复发性缺血性卒中的风险为5%-10%,且在首次发作后的头几天内风险尤其升高。由于TIA主要预后良好,不会遗留新的持续性缺损,因此预测TIA后卒中复发的兴趣日益浓厚。这促使了一些评分系统的开发,最初是用于长期预后评估,如卒中预后工具(SPI)或汉基评分,这两种评分在TIA后1年或2年都显示出良好的预测价值。年龄、高血压或心血管疾病等危险因素被纳入了这些系统。由于对症状发作后24小时内就诊的患者进行卒中早期风险预测在急诊卒中单元中临床相关性越来越高,因此开发了ABCD评分(针对预测因素年龄、血压、临床症状、症状持续时间)。验证结果很有前景,因此又开发了更多评分系统,这引发了大量研究试图验证这些系统或对其进行改进(如ABCD(2)、ABCD(2)I、ABCD(3)、ABCD(3)I、CIP模型、ASPIRE方法、ABCDE+等)。主要方法包括纳入影像学结果(如弥散加权成像阳性)或病因学考量(如颈动脉狭窄或心房颤动)。然而,这些新的评分系统需要广泛的诊断检查,因此只能在大型卒中中心使用。目前,对于急性TIA的管理,多项指南推荐使用ABCD(2)。