• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对痴呆症患者家庭照料者的心理社会干预措施的卫生经济分析。

Health economic analysis on a psychosocial intervention for family caregivers of persons with dementia.

作者信息

Dahlrup Beth, Nordell Eva, Steen Carlsson Katarina, Elmståhl Sölve

机构信息

Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2014;37(3-4):181-95. doi: 10.1159/000355365. Epub 2013 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1159/000355365
PMID:24157891
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Psychosocial intervention has shown positive effects on the caregivers' burden and satisfaction. The aims of this study were to describe the cost and cost-effectiveness of such an intervention.

METHODS

We analyzed resource use and costs of formal care for 308 persons with dementia and their caregivers' health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

RESULTS

The costs of home help services were lower in the subgroup of spouse caregivers in the intervention group and the cost of nursing home placement was lower in the intervention group. While the person with dementia lived at home, caregivers in the intervention group reported a higher HRQoL (p < 0.01). After the person with dementia had moved to a nursing home, spouses in the control group had a lower HRQoL (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The result can be interpreted as a positive effect of the intervention focusing on the identified specific needs of the family caregivers.

摘要

背景/目的:心理社会干预已显示出对照顾者负担和满意度有积极影响。本研究的目的是描述这种干预的成本和成本效益。

方法

我们分析了308名痴呆症患者的正式护理资源使用和成本以及他们照顾者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。

结果

干预组配偶照顾者亚组的居家帮助服务成本较低,干预组的养老院安置成本较低。当痴呆症患者在家居住时,干预组的照顾者报告的健康相关生活质量较高(p < 0.01)。痴呆症患者搬到养老院后,对照组的配偶健康相关生活质量较低(p < 0.001)。

结论

该结果可解释为针对家庭照顾者已确定的特定需求的干预产生了积极效果。

相似文献

1
Health economic analysis on a psychosocial intervention for family caregivers of persons with dementia.针对痴呆症患者家庭照料者的心理社会干预措施的卫生经济分析。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2014;37(3-4):181-95. doi: 10.1159/000355365. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
2
Psychosocial intervention for family caregivers of people with dementia reduces caregiver's burden: development and effect after 6 and 12 months.针对痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的心理社会干预可减轻照顾者负担:干预措施的制定及其在6个月和12个月后的效果
Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Mar;22(1):98-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00498.x.
3
Effective psychosocial intervention for family caregivers lengthens time elapsed before nursing home placement of individuals with dementia: a five-year follow-up study.针对家庭护理人员的有效心理社会干预可延长痴呆症患者进入养老院的时间:一项为期五年的随访研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2008 Dec;20(6):1177-92. doi: 10.1017/S1041610208007503. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
4
Relationships between income, subjective health and caregiver burden in caregivers of people with dementia in group living care: a cross-sectional community-based study.集体生活照料中痴呆症患者照料者的收入、主观健康与照料负担之间的关系:一项基于社区的横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Mar;44(3):435-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.016. Epub 2006 Oct 31.
5
Preserving health of Alzheimer caregivers: impact of a spouse caregiver intervention.维护阿尔茨海默病照料者的健康:配偶照料者干预措施的影响
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;15(9):780-9. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31805d858a.
6
Early psychosocial intervention does not delay institutionalization in persons with mild Alzheimer disease and has impact on neither disease progression nor caregivers' well-being: ALSOVA 3-year follow-up.早期心理社会干预不会延迟轻度阿尔茨海默病患者的机构化,对疾病进展和照料者的幸福感均无影响:ALSOVA 3年随访
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;31(3):273-83. doi: 10.1002/gps.4321. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
7
Improving caregiver well-being delays nursing home placement of patients with Alzheimer disease.改善照护者的幸福感可延迟阿尔茨海默病患者入住养老院的时间。
Neurology. 2006 Nov 14;67(9):1592-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000242727.81172.91.
8
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an in-home respite care program in supporting informal caregivers of people with dementia: design of a comparative study.一项居家喘息护理项目在支持痴呆症患者非正式照料者方面的有效性和成本效益:一项比较研究的设计
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Dec 2;16(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0373-4.
9
The relationship between caregiver burden, caregivers' perceived health and their sense of coherence in caring for elders with dementia.照顾痴呆老人时照顾者负担、照顾者的健康认知与其连贯感之间的关系。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Mar;17(6):790-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02066.x.
10
[Effectivity of early psychosocial counselling for family caregivers in general practioner based dementia care].[基于全科医生的痴呆症护理中早期心理社会咨询对家庭照顾者的有效性]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2012 Oct;137(43):2201-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1305320. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
An integrative review of measures of transitions and care coordination for persons living with dementia and their caregivers.对痴呆症患者及其照护者的过渡措施与照护协调的综合综述。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2023 Aug 6;9(3):e12391. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12391. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
2
The Costs of Dementia in Europe: An Updated Review and Meta-analysis.欧洲的痴呆症成本:一项更新的综述和荟萃分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Jan;41(1):59-75. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01212-z. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
3
Cost-Utility Analyses of Interventions for Informal Carers: A Systematic and Critical Review.
干预非正规照护者的成本-效用分析:系统和批判性评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Apr;38(4):341-356. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00874-6.
4
CP-North: living life in the Nordic countries? A retrospective register research protocol on individuals with cerebral palsy and their parents living in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland and Iceland.CP-北欧:在北欧国家生活?一项关于生活在瑞典、挪威、丹麦、芬兰和冰岛的脑瘫患者及其父母的回顾性登记研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 1;9(10):e024438. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024438.
5
Spillover Effects on Caregivers' and Family Members' Utility: A Systematic Review of the Literature.对照顾者和家庭成员效用的溢出效应:文献系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Apr;37(4):475-499. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00768-7.
6
Acceptability of psychosocial interventions for dementia caregivers: a systematic review.痴呆症照顾者心理社会干预措施的可接受性:系统评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1976-4.
7
The Care Ecosystem: Promoting self-efficacy among dementia family caregivers.照护生态系统:提升痴呆症家庭照护者的自我效能感。
Dementia (London). 2020 Aug;19(6):1955-1973. doi: 10.1177/1471301218814121. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
8
The caregiving phenomenon and caregiver participation in dementia.照护现象与照护者参与痴呆症护理
Scand J Caring Sci. 2019 Jun;33(2):255-265. doi: 10.1111/scs.12627. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
9
Health economic evaluations of non-pharmacological interventions for persons with dementia and their informal caregivers: a systematic review.非药物干预措施对痴呆症患者及其非专业照护者的健康经济学评价:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Mar 9;18(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0751-1.
10
Impact of an Individualized Physical Activity Intervention on Improving Mental Health Outcomes in Family Caregivers of Persons with Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.个性化体育活动干预对改善痴呆症患者家庭照顾者心理健康结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
AIMS Med Sci. 2016;3(1):15-31. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2016.1.15. Epub 2015 Dec 17.