School of Medical and Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Science, University of Technology, Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:136763. doi: 10.1155/2013/136763. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
Introduction. In traditional Chinese acupuncture, needle sensation (deqi) is purported to contribute to a therapeutic outcome. While researchers have attempted to define deqi qualitatively, few have examined the effects of needling parameters on its intensity. Methods. 24 healthy subjects completed eight interventions scheduled at least one week apart, which involved manual acupuncture to LI4 or a designated nonacupoint (NAP) on the hand, with real or simulated manipulation each three minutes and needle retentions of one or 21 minutes. Intensities of needling sensation and pain were reported every three minutes and sensation qualities were reported post-intervention. Results. Immediately after needle insertion, similar levels of mean needle sensation and of pain were reported independent of intervention. At subsequent measurement times, only two interventions (one at LI4 and one at NAP) maintained statistically significantly elevated needle sensation and pain scores and reported higher numbers of needle sensation descriptors. For both, the needle was retained for 21 minutes and manipulated every three minutes. Neither intervention differed significantly in terms of levels of pain, and needle sensation or numbers and qualities of needle sensation described. Conclusion. In this group of healthy subjects, the initial needling for all eight interventions elicited similar levels of needle sensation and pain. These levels were only maintained if there was ongoing of needle manipulation and retention of the needle. By contrast, the strength of needle sensation or pain experienced was independent of insertion site.
引言。在传统的中医针灸中,针刺感觉(得气)被认为对治疗效果有贡献。虽然研究人员试图定性地定义得气,但很少有人研究针刺参数对其强度的影响。方法。24 名健康受试者完成了至少间隔一周的八项干预措施,包括手部的 LI4 或指定的非穴位(NAP)的手动针刺,每三分钟进行真实或模拟操作,留置针一分钟或 21 分钟。每三分钟报告一次针刺感觉和疼痛的强度,干预后报告感觉质量。结果。立即插入针后,无论干预措施如何,平均针刺感觉和疼痛的水平相似。在随后的测量时间,只有两种干预措施(一种在 LI4,一种在 NAP)保持了统计学上显著升高的针刺感觉和疼痛评分,并报告了更多的针刺感觉描述。对于这两种情况,针都保留了 21 分钟,并每三分钟进行一次操作。两种干预措施在疼痛水平、针刺感觉或描述的针刺感觉数量和质量方面均无显著差异。结论。在这组健康受试者中,所有八项干预措施的初始针刺都引起了相似水平的针刺感觉和疼痛。只有当针持续操作和留置时,这些水平才能维持。相比之下,针刺感觉或疼痛的强度与插入部位无关。