Patel Haridarshan N, Ursan Iulia D, Zueger Patrick M, Cavallari Larisa H, Pickard A Simon
Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Pharmacotherapy. 2014 Feb;34(2):151-65. doi: 10.1002/phar.1364. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
Pharmacogenomics has an important role in the evolution of personalized medicine, and its widespread uptake may ultimately depend on the interests and perspectives of key players in health care. Our aim was to summarize studies on stakeholder perspectives and attitudes toward pharmacogenomic testing. Thus, we conducted a review of original research studies that reported stakeholder views on pharmacogenomic testing using a structured approach in PubMed, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and EMBASE. A standardized data abstraction form was developed that included stakeholder group of interest-patients, general public, providers, and payers. Stakeholder views regarding barriers to pharmacogenetic implementation were organized into the following themes: ancillary information-related, clinical, economic, educational, ethical or legal, medical mistrust, and practicality. Of 34 studies that met our inclusion criteria, 37 perspectives were reported (15 on providers, 9 on the general public, 9 on patients, and 4 on payers). The most common topics that arose in studies of providers related to clinical usefulness of genetic data (n=11) and educational needs (n=11). Among the general public, the most common concerns were medical mistrust (n=5), insufficient education (n=5), and practicality (n=5). The most prevalent issues from the patient perspective were ethical or legal (n=6) and economic (n=5) issues. Among payers, leading issues were practicality (n=4) and clinical usefulness (n=3). There was overlap in the topics and concerns across stakeholder perspectives, including lack of knowledge about pharmacogenomic testing. Views on issues related to privacy, cost, and test result dissemination varied by stakeholder perspective. Limited research had been conducted in underrepresented groups. Efforts to address the issues raised by stakeholders may facilitate the implementation of pharmacogenomic testing into clinical practice.
药物基因组学在个性化医疗的发展中发挥着重要作用,其广泛应用最终可能取决于医疗保健领域关键参与者的利益和观点。我们的目的是总结关于利益相关者对药物基因组检测的观点和态度的研究。因此,我们对原始研究进行了综述,这些研究在PubMed、《国际药学文摘》、《护理及相关健康文献累积索引》和EMBASE中使用结构化方法报告了利益相关者对药物基因组检测的看法。我们开发了一种标准化的数据提取表,其中包括感兴趣的利益相关者群体——患者、普通公众、医疗服务提供者和支付方。利益相关者对药物遗传学实施障碍的看法被归纳为以下主题:辅助信息相关、临床、经济、教育、伦理或法律、医疗不信任和实用性。在符合我们纳入标准的34项研究中,报告了37种观点(15种关于医疗服务提供者,9种关于普通公众,9种关于患者,4种关于支付方)。在医疗服务提供者的研究中出现的最常见主题与基因数据的临床实用性(n = 11)和教育需求(n = 11)有关。在普通公众中,最常见的担忧是医疗不信任(n = 5)、教育不足(n = 5)和实用性(n = 5)。从患者角度来看,最普遍的问题是伦理或法律问题(n = 6)和经济问题(n = 5)。在支付方中,主要问题是实用性(n = 4)和临床实用性(n = 3)。不同利益相关者的观点在主题和关注点上存在重叠,包括对药物基因组检测缺乏了解。关于隐私、成本和检测结果传播等问题的观点因利益相关者的角度而异。在代表性不足的群体中开展的研究有限。解决利益相关者提出的问题的努力可能有助于将药物基因组检测应用于临床实践。