Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, , Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Oct 28;368(1631):20130074. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0074. Print 2013.
During the latter half of the last century, evidence of reproductive competition between males and male selection by females led to the development of a stereotypical view of sex differences that characterized males as competitive and aggressive, and females as passive and choosy, which is currently being revised. Here, we compare social competition and its consequences for selection in males and females and argue that similar selection processes operate in both sexes and that contrasts between the sexes are quantitative rather than qualitative. We suggest that classifications of selection based on distinction between the form of competition or the components of fitness that are involved introduce unnecessary complexities and that the most useful approach in understanding the evolution and distribution of differences and similarities between the sexes is to compare the operation of selection in males and females in different reproductive systems.
在上个世纪后半叶,雄性之间的生殖竞争和雌性选择的证据导致了一种刻板的性别差异观点的发展,这种观点认为雄性具有竞争性和攻击性,而雌性则具有被动性和选择性,这种观点目前正在被修正。在这里,我们比较了雄性和雌性的社会竞争及其对选择的影响,并认为类似的选择过程在两性中都起作用,而且两性之间的差异是数量上的而不是质上的。我们认为,基于竞争形式或涉及的适应成分的区别对选择进行分类会引入不必要的复杂性,而理解性别差异的进化和分布的最有用方法是比较不同生殖系统中雄性和雌性选择的运作。