Social Science Division, Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Tufts University, USA.
Community Ment Health J. 1968 Aug;4(4):326-33. doi: 10.1007/BF01435262.
In community health work, the team approach, is often proposed as one way of getting things done. Yet, when teamwork fails, we are at a loss in assessing the reasons for its failure. In this paper, we suggest an analytic model in viewing the possible reasons of this failure. We examine the structure of the team within the context of six assumptionsunder which teamwork operates: equality, knowledge, professions, marginality, task, and domain. When these assumptions are viewed in relation to possible cognitive dissonance,consisting of functional and substantive rationalities, it is our contention that success or failure in teamwork can best be explained by the degree of dissonance that is inherent in the assumptions.
在社区卫生工作中,团队方法通常被提议为完成工作的一种方式。然而,当团队合作失败时,我们在评估其失败原因方面却茫然无措。在本文中,我们提出了一种分析模型,用于观察这种失败的可能原因。我们在团队合作运作的六个假设的背景下考察团队的结构:平等、知识、专业、边缘、任务和领域。当将这些假设与由功能和实质性理性组成的可能认知失调联系起来进行考察时,我们认为,团队合作的成功或失败可以通过假设中固有的失调程度来最好地解释。