Department of Biology, The University of Mississippi, 38677, University, Mississippi, USA.
Microb Ecol. 1996 Mar;31(2):115-24. doi: 10.1007/BF00167858.
Several media and techniques were compared for their efficiency to enumerate viable heterotrophs from both a karst and sand aquifer spring. A medium designed to enumerate bacteria from nutrient-poor waters (HCFU) as well as R2A medium proved superior to tryptic soy agar; however, the difference was always less than one order of magnitude. Membrane filtration resulted in lower counts of microbes than the spread plate, multitube turbidity, or drop plate methods from samples of both sand and karst springs. The drop plate technique yielded higher viable counts from the sand spring and basin of the karst spring, with a precision of 21% (coefficient of variation) and a maximum plating efficiency of 3.4% (viable count/direct count × 100). Subsequently, 63% of isolates from drop plates were recovered on HCFU. Microcolonies were visible by epifluorescence microscopy, acridine orange staining, and subsequent examination of excised agar sections containing drops.
几种媒体和技术的效率进行了比较,以从喀斯特含水层泉和砂含水层泉中计数可培养异养生物。一种旨在从贫营养水(HCFU)中计数细菌的培养基以及 R2A 培养基被证明优于胰蛋白酶大豆琼脂;然而,差异始终小于一个数量级。与平板涂布、多管浊度和滴板法相比,膜过滤法从砂泉和岩溶泉的样本中得到的微生物数量更少。滴板技术从砂泉和岩溶泉盆中获得了更高的活菌计数,精度为 21%(变异系数),最大平板效率为 3.4%(活菌计数/直接计数×100)。随后,63%的滴板分离物可在 HCFU 上恢复。通过荧光显微镜、吖啶橙染色和随后检查含有滴液的琼脂切片,可以观察到微菌落。