Heidelberg J F, Shahamat M, Levin M, Rahman I, Stelma G, Grim C, Colwell R R
Marine-Estuarine-Environmental Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Sep;63(9):3585-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.9.3585-3588.1997.
Estimations of the bacterial content of air can be more easily made now than a decade ago, with colony formation the method of choice for enumeration of airborne bacteria. However, plate counts are subject to error because bacteria exposed to the air may remain viable yet lose the ability to form colonies, i.e., they become viable but nonculturable. If airborne bacteria exhibit this phenomenon, colony formation data will significantly underestimate the bacterial populations in air samples. The objective of the study reported here was to determine the effect of aerosolization on viability and colony-forming ability of Serratia marcescens, Klebsiella planticola, and Cytophaga allerginae. A collision nebulizer was used to spray bacterial suspensions into an aerosol chamber, after which duplicate samples were collected in all-glass impingers over a 4-h period. Humidity was maintained at ca. 20 to 25%, and temperature was maintained at 20 to 22 degrees C for each of two replicate trials per microorganism. Viability was determined by using a modified direct viable count method, employing nalidixic acid or aztreonam and p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet (INT). Cells were stained with acridine orange and observed by epifluorescence microscopy to enumerate total and viable cells. Viable cells were defined as those elongating in the presence of antibiotic and/or reducing INT. CFU were determined by plating on tryptic soy agar and R2A agar. It was found that culture techniques did not provide an adequate description of the bacterial burdens of indoor air (i.e., less than 10% of the aerosolized bacteria were capable of forming visible colonies). It is concluded that total cell count procedures provide a better approximation of the number of bacterial cells in air and that procedures other than plate counting are needed to enumerate bacteria in aerosol samples, especially if the public health quality of indoor air is to be estimated.
与十年前相比,现在对空气中细菌含量的估算变得更加容易,菌落形成法是对空气中细菌进行计数的首选方法。然而,平板计数容易出现误差,因为暴露在空气中的细菌可能仍然存活,但失去了形成菌落的能力,也就是说,它们变得可存活但不可培养。如果空气中的细菌出现这种现象,菌落形成数据将显著低估空气样本中的细菌数量。本文报道的这项研究的目的是确定雾化对粘质沙雷氏菌、植物源克雷伯氏菌和嗜过敏性纤维粘菌的活力和菌落形成能力的影响。使用碰撞雾化器将细菌悬浮液喷入气溶胶室,之后在4小时内用全玻璃冲击式采样器采集两份重复样本。每种微生物进行两次重复试验,每次试验中湿度保持在约20%至25%,温度保持在20至22摄氏度。通过使用改良的直接活菌计数法,采用萘啶酸或氨曲南以及对碘硝基四氮唑蓝(INT)来测定活力。细胞用吖啶橙染色,通过落射荧光显微镜观察以计数总细胞和活细胞。活细胞定义为在抗生素存在下伸长和/或还原INT的细胞。通过在胰蛋白胨大豆琼脂和R2A琼脂上平板接种来测定CFU。结果发现,培养技术无法充分描述室内空气中的细菌负荷(即,雾化细菌中不到10%能够形成可见菌落)。得出的结论是,总细胞计数程序能更好地估算空气中细菌细胞的数量,并且需要平板计数以外的程序来对气溶胶样本中的细菌进行计数,特别是在要评估室内空气的公共卫生质量时。