A medical student at the School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora2currently with the Department of Medicine, Exempla St Joseph Hospital, Denver, Colorado.
medical student at the School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle4currently serving a University of Washington Department of Internal Medicine Boise Internal Medicine Residency, Boise, Idaho.
JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Jan;150(1):56-60. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6340.
The use of social media by dermatology journals and professional and patient-centered dermatology organizations remains largely unknown and, to our knowledge, has yet to be fully evaluated.
To evaluate and quantify the extent of involvement of dermatology journals, professional dermatology organizations, and dermatology-related patient advocate groups on social networking sites.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We obtained an archived list of 102 current dermatology journals from SCImago on the World Wide Web and used the list to investigate Facebook, Twitter, and individual journal websites for the presence of social media accounts. We identified professional and patient-centered dermatology organization activity on social networks through queries of predetermined search terms on Google, Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. The activity of each entity was documented by recording the following metrics of popularity: the numbers of Facebook "likes," Twitter "followers," and LinkedIn "members."
The numbers of Facebook likes, Twitter followers, and LinkedIn members corresponding to each dermatology journal and each professional and patient-related dermatology organization.
On July 17, 2012, of the 102 dermatology journals ranked by SCImago, 12.7% were present on Facebook and 13.7% on Twitter. We identified popular dermatology journals based on Facebook likes and Twitter followers, led by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology and Dermatology Times, respectively. Popular professional dermatology organizations included dermRounds Dermatology Network (11 251 likes on Facebook and 2900 followers on Twitter). The most popular dermatology patient-centered organizations were the Skin Cancer Foundation (20 119 likes on Facebook), DermaTalk (21 542 followers on Twitter), and the National Psoriasis Foundation (200 members on LinkedIn).
Patient-centered and professional dermatology organizations use social networking sites; however, academic journals tend to lag behind significantly. Although some journals are active in social media, most have yet to recognize the potential benefits of fully embracing popular social networks.
皮肤科杂志以及专业和以患者为中心的皮肤科组织使用社交媒体的情况在很大程度上尚不清楚,据我们所知,这方面尚未得到充分评估。
评估和量化皮肤科杂志、专业皮肤科组织以及与皮肤科相关的患者倡导团体在社交网站上的参与程度。
设计、环境和参与者:我们从互联网上的 Scimago 获取了一份当前皮肤科杂志的存档清单,并用这份清单调查了 Facebook、Twitter 以及个别期刊网站上是否存在社交媒体账号。我们通过在 Google、Facebook、Twitter 和 LinkedIn 上预先设定的搜索词查询,确定了专业和以患者为中心的皮肤科组织在社交网络上的活动。通过记录每个实体的以下流行度指标来记录每个实体的活动:Facebook“点赞”、Twitter“关注者”和 LinkedIn“成员”的数量。
与每个皮肤科杂志以及每个专业和以患者为中心的皮肤科组织相对应的 Facebook“点赞”、Twitter“关注者”和 LinkedIn“成员”的数量。
在 2012 年 7 月 17 日,根据 Scimago 排名的 102 种皮肤科杂志中,有 12.7%在 Facebook 上,有 13.7%在 Twitter 上。我们根据 Facebook“点赞”和 Twitter“关注者”确定了一些受欢迎的皮肤科杂志,其中以《美国皮肤病学会杂志》和《皮肤病时报》为首。受欢迎的专业皮肤科组织包括 dermRounds 皮肤科网络(在 Facebook 上有 11251 个赞,在 Twitter 上有 2900 个关注者)。最受欢迎的以患者为中心的皮肤科组织是皮肤癌基金会(在 Facebook 上有 20119 个赞)、DermaTalk(在 Twitter 上有 21542 个关注者)和全国银屑病基金会(在 LinkedIn 上有 200 名成员)。
以患者为中心和专业的皮肤科组织使用社交网络;然而,学术期刊往往明显滞后。尽管一些期刊在社交媒体上很活跃,但大多数期刊尚未认识到全面拥抱流行社交网络的潜在好处。