Industrial Toxicology Research Centre, M.G. Marg, Post Box No. 80, 226001, Lucknow, India.
Environ Monit Assess. 1994 Oct;33(1):53-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00546661.
One thousand three-hundred and ninety-four drinking water sources comprising ground water, surface water and piped supplies were tested in order to compare the presence-absence (P-A) test with standard MPN method to detect coliforms as indicators of water quality. Out of 1394 samples, 1074 (77.04%) and 1030 (74.88%) were positive by the MPN and P-A test, respectively. The P-A test detected 96% of the positives detected by the MPN test. The P-A test may be effectively used as a rapid screening method to detect coliform contamination in less polluted sources such as ground water and piped supplies.
为了比较 P-A 检测法和标准最大可能数(MPN)法检测水作为水质指标的大肠菌群的存在/缺失情况,对包括地下水、地表水和管道供水在内的 1394 个饮用水水源进行了检测。在 1394 个样本中,MPN 和 P-A 检测法的阳性率分别为 1074(77.04%)和 1030(74.88%)。P-A 检测法检测到了 MPN 检测法阳性样本的 96%。P-A 检测法可有效地作为一种快速筛选方法,用于检测污染程度较轻的地下水和管道供水等水源中的大肠菌群污染。