Suppr超能文献

用于监测饮用水质量的大肠菌群存在与否检测

The presence-absence coliform test for monitoring drinking water quality.

作者信息

Rice E W, Geldreich E E, Read E J

机构信息

Drinking Water Research Division, EPA, Cincinnati, OH 45268.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 1989 Jan-Feb;104(1):54-8.

Abstract

The concern for improved monitoring of the sanitary quality of drinking water has prompted interest in alternative methods for the detection of total coliform bacteria. A simplified qualitative presence-absence test has been proposed as an alternate procedure for detecting coliform bacteria in potable water. In this paper data from four comparative studies were analyzed to compare the recovery of total coliform bacteria from drinking water using the presence-absence test, the multiple fermentation tube procedure, and the membrane filter technique. The four studies were of water samples taken from four different geographic areas of the United States: Hawaii, New England (Vermont and New Hampshire), Oregon, and Pennsylvania. Analysis of the results of these studies were compared, based upon the number of positive samples detected by each method. Combined recoveries showed the presence-absence test detected significantly higher numbers of samples with coliforms than either the fermentation tube or membrane filter methods, P less than 0.01. The fermentation tube procedure detected significantly more positive samples than the membrane filter technique, P less than 0.01. Based upon the analysis of the combined data base, it is clear that the presence-absence test is as sensitive as the current coliform methods for the examination of potable water. The presence-absence test offers a viable alternative to water utility companies that elect to use the frequency-of-occurrence approach for compliance monitoring.

摘要

对改善饮用水卫生质量监测的关注引发了人们对检测总大肠菌群细菌替代方法的兴趣。一种简化的定性有无试验已被提议作为检测饮用水中大肠菌群细菌的替代程序。本文分析了四项比较研究的数据,以比较使用有无试验、多管发酵法和膜过滤技术从饮用水中回收总大肠菌群细菌的情况。这四项研究是对从美国四个不同地理区域采集的水样进行的:夏威夷、新英格兰(佛蒙特州和新罕布什尔州)、俄勒冈州和宾夕法尼亚州。根据每种方法检测到的阳性样本数量对这些研究结果进行了分析比较。综合回收率显示,有无试验检测到的含大肠菌群样本数量明显高于发酵管法或膜过滤法,P值小于0.01。发酵管法检测到的阳性样本明显多于膜过滤技术,P值小于0.01。基于对合并数据库的分析,很明显有无试验在检测饮用水方面与当前的大肠菌群检测方法一样敏感。有无试验为选择使用出现频率方法进行合规监测的自来水公司提供了一种可行的替代方法。

相似文献

7
Identification of coliform genera recovered from water using different technologies.利用不同技术从水中回收的大肠菌类属的鉴定。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009 Dec;49(6):685-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02726.x. Epub 2009 Aug 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验