Quality, Safety, and Informatics Group, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee.
Bute Medical School, University of St Andrews, Fife, Scotland.
Chest. 2014 Apr;145(4):779-786. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-1235.
β-Blockers are avoided in asthma over concerns regarding acute bronchoconstriction. Risk is greatest following acute exposure, including the potential for antagonism of β2-agonist rescue therapy.
A systematic review of databases was performed to identify all randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trials evaluating acute β-blocker exposure in asthma. Effect estimates for changes in respiratory function, symptoms, and β2-agonist response were pooled using random effects meta-analysis with heterogeneity investigated.
Acute selective β-blockers in the doses given caused a mean change in FEV1 of −6.9% (95% CI, −8.5 to −5.2), a fall in FEV1 of ≥20% in one in eight patients (P=.03), symptoms affecting one in 33 patients (P=.18), and attenuation of concomitant β2-agonist response of −10.2% (95% CI, −14.0 to −6.4). Corresponding values for acute nonselective β-blockers in the doses given were −10.2% (95% CI, −14.7 to −5.6), one in nine patients (P=.02), one in 13 patients (P=.14), and −20.0% (95% CI, −29.4 to −10.7). Following investigation of heterogeneity, clear differences were found for celiprolol and labetalol. A dose-response relationship was demonstrated for selective β-blockers.
Selective β-blockers are better tolerated but not completely risk-free. Risk from acute exposure may be mitigated using the smallest dose possible and β-blockers with greater β1-selectivity. β-Blocker-induced bronchospasm responded partially to β2-agonists in the doses given with response blunted more by nonselective β-blockers than selective β-blockers. Use of β-blockers in asthma could possibly be based upon a risk assessment on an individual patient basis.
由于担心急性支气管收缩,β受体阻滞剂在哮喘中被避免使用。风险最大的是急性暴露后,包括β2 受体激动剂抢救治疗的潜在拮抗作用。
对数据库进行系统评价,以确定所有评估急性β受体阻滞剂暴露在哮喘中的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总呼吸功能、症状和β2 受体激动剂反应变化的效应估计值,并进行异质性研究。
给予剂量的急性选择性β受体阻滞剂导致 FEV1 平均变化为-6.9%(95%CI,-8.5 至-5.2),八分之一的患者(P=.03)FEV1 下降≥20%,三十分之一的患者(P=.18)出现症状,同时β2 受体激动剂反应减弱-10.2%(95%CI,-14.0 至-6.4)。给予剂量的急性非选择性β受体阻滞剂的相应值为-10.2%(95%CI,-14.7 至-5.6),九分之一的患者(P=.02),十三分之一的患者(P=.14),-20.0%(95%CI,-29.4 至-10.7)。在对异质性进行调查后,发现塞利洛尔和拉贝洛尔之间存在明显差异。还证明了选择性β受体阻滞剂存在剂量反应关系。
选择性β受体阻滞剂的耐受性更好,但并非完全无风险。使用尽可能小的剂量和具有更大β1 选择性的β受体阻滞剂可能会减轻急性暴露的风险。在给予的剂量下,β受体阻滞剂引起的支气管痉挛部分对β2 受体激动剂有反应,但非选择性β受体阻滞剂比选择性β受体阻滞剂更能使反应迟钝。β受体阻滞剂在哮喘中的使用可能可以基于对个体患者的风险评估。