Suppr超能文献

哮喘患者急性β受体阻滞剂暴露的不良呼吸影响:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Adverse respiratory effect of acute β-blocker exposure in asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Quality, Safety, and Informatics Group, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee.

Bute Medical School, University of St Andrews, Fife, Scotland.

出版信息

Chest. 2014 Apr;145(4):779-786. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-1235.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

β-Blockers are avoided in asthma over concerns regarding acute bronchoconstriction. Risk is greatest following acute exposure, including the potential for antagonism of β2-agonist rescue therapy.

METHODS

A systematic review of databases was performed to identify all randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trials evaluating acute β-blocker exposure in asthma. Effect estimates for changes in respiratory function, symptoms, and β2-agonist response were pooled using random effects meta-analysis with heterogeneity investigated.

RESULTS

Acute selective β-blockers in the doses given caused a mean change in FEV1 of −6.9% (95% CI, −8.5 to −5.2), a fall in FEV1 of ≥20% in one in eight patients (P=.03), symptoms affecting one in 33 patients (P=.18), and attenuation of concomitant β2-agonist response of −10.2% (95% CI, −14.0 to −6.4). Corresponding values for acute nonselective β-blockers in the doses given were −10.2% (95% CI, −14.7 to −5.6), one in nine patients (P=.02), one in 13 patients (P=.14), and −20.0% (95% CI, −29.4 to −10.7). Following investigation of heterogeneity, clear differences were found for celiprolol and labetalol. A dose-response relationship was demonstrated for selective β-blockers.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective β-blockers are better tolerated but not completely risk-free. Risk from acute exposure may be mitigated using the smallest dose possible and β-blockers with greater β1-selectivity. β-Blocker-induced bronchospasm responded partially to β2-agonists in the doses given with response blunted more by nonselective β-blockers than selective β-blockers. Use of β-blockers in asthma could possibly be based upon a risk assessment on an individual patient basis.

摘要

背景

由于担心急性支气管收缩,β受体阻滞剂在哮喘中被避免使用。风险最大的是急性暴露后,包括β2 受体激动剂抢救治疗的潜在拮抗作用。

方法

对数据库进行系统评价,以确定所有评估急性β受体阻滞剂暴露在哮喘中的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总呼吸功能、症状和β2 受体激动剂反应变化的效应估计值,并进行异质性研究。

结果

给予剂量的急性选择性β受体阻滞剂导致 FEV1 平均变化为-6.9%(95%CI,-8.5 至-5.2),八分之一的患者(P=.03)FEV1 下降≥20%,三十分之一的患者(P=.18)出现症状,同时β2 受体激动剂反应减弱-10.2%(95%CI,-14.0 至-6.4)。给予剂量的急性非选择性β受体阻滞剂的相应值为-10.2%(95%CI,-14.7 至-5.6),九分之一的患者(P=.02),十三分之一的患者(P=.14),-20.0%(95%CI,-29.4 至-10.7)。在对异质性进行调查后,发现塞利洛尔和拉贝洛尔之间存在明显差异。还证明了选择性β受体阻滞剂存在剂量反应关系。

结论

选择性β受体阻滞剂的耐受性更好,但并非完全无风险。使用尽可能小的剂量和具有更大β1 选择性的β受体阻滞剂可能会减轻急性暴露的风险。在给予的剂量下,β受体阻滞剂引起的支气管痉挛部分对β2 受体激动剂有反应,但非选择性β受体阻滞剂比选择性β受体阻滞剂更能使反应迟钝。β受体阻滞剂在哮喘中的使用可能可以基于对个体患者的风险评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验