• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检验编码细化假说:范例排序对识别和回忆的影响。

Testing the encoding elaboration hypothesis: The effects of exemplar ranking on recognition and recall.

机构信息

Division of the Social Sciences, Fordham University at Lincoln Center, 10023, New York, New York.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1977 Nov;5(6):666-72. doi: 10.3758/BF03197413.

DOI:10.3758/BF03197413
PMID:24203283
Abstract

Two experiments investigated the effects of exemplar ranking on retention. High-ranking exemplars are words judged to be prototypical of a given category; low-ranking exemplars are words judged to be atypical of a given category. In Experiment 1, an incidental learning paradigm was used to measure reaction time to answer an encoding question as well as subsequent recognition. It was found that low-ranking exemplars were classified more slowly but recognized better than high-ranking exemplars. Other comparisons of the effects of category encoding, rhyme encoding, and typescript encoding on response latency and recognition replicated the results of Craik and Tulving (1975). In Experiment 2, unanticipated free recall of live previously learned paired associate lists revealed that a list composed of low-ranking exemplars was better recalled than a comparable list composed of high-ranking exemplars. Moreover, this was true only when the lists were studied in the context of appropriate category cues. These findings are discussed in terms of the encoding elaboration hypothesis.

摘要

两项实验研究了范例排序对保留的影响。高排名范例是被判断为给定类别原型的单词;低排名范例是被判断为给定类别非典型的单词。在实验 1 中,使用附带学习范式来测量对编码问题的反应时间以及随后的识别。结果发现,低排名范例的分类速度较慢,但识别效果优于高排名范例。对类别编码、押韵编码和打字编码对反应时和识别的影响的其他比较复制了 Craik 和 Tulving(1975)的结果。在实验 2 中,对之前学习的配对联想列表的意外自由回忆显示,由低排名范例组成的列表比由高排名范例组成的可比列表更容易回忆。此外,只有在列表在适当的类别提示的上下文中进行研究时才是如此。这些发现是根据编码详细说明假设进行讨论的。

相似文献

1
Testing the encoding elaboration hypothesis: The effects of exemplar ranking on recognition and recall.检验编码细化假说:范例排序对识别和回忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 1977 Nov;5(6):666-72. doi: 10.3758/BF03197413.
2
Processing category terms in context: instantiation and the structure of semantic categories.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1984 Jan;10(1):95-103. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.10.1.95.
3
The congruent, the incongruent, and the unexpected: Event-related potentials unveil the processes involved in schematic encoding.一致、不一致和意外:事件相关电位揭示了图式编码所涉及的过程。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Aug;131:285-293. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.013. Epub 2019 May 18.
4
Two routes for activation in the priming of categorical coordinates.在分类坐标启动中的两种激活途径。
J Gen Psychol. 2008 Jan;135(1):65-83. doi: 10.3200/GENP.135.1.65-83.
5
The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on implicit memory, explicit memory, and memory for source.编码时的知觉干扰对内隐记忆、外显记忆及来源记忆的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Sep;22(5):1067-87. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.5.1067.
6
An investigation of time course of category and semantic priming.范畴和语义启动的时间进程研究。
J Gen Psychol. 2008 Apr;135(2):133-48. doi: 10.3200/GENP.135.2.133-150.
7
The role of exemplar typicality and encoding strategies in category retrieval-induced forgetting.范例典型性和编码策略在类别检索诱发遗忘中的作用。
Memory. 2014;22(3):212-21. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.778288. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
8
Hypermnesia in free recall and cued recall.自由回忆和线索回忆中的记忆增强。
Mem Cognit. 1993 Jan;21(1):48-62. doi: 10.3758/bf03211164.
9
Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding.学习过程中的检索有助于后续的记忆编码。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):287-97. doi: 10.1037/a0021801.
10
Context effects in a category verification task as assessed by event-related brain potential (ERP) measures.
Biol Psychol. 1998 Feb;47(2):121-35. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0511(97)00024-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Semantic-memory sources of episodic retrieval failure.情景记忆提取失败的语义记忆来源。
Mem Cognit. 1985 Sep;13(5):442-52. doi: 10.3758/bf03198457.

本文引用的文献

1
Memory for words recently classified.最近分类单词的记忆。
Mem Cognit. 1974 Jan;2(1):47-52. doi: 10.3758/BF03197491.
2
Secondary reinforcement in rats as a function of information value and reliability of the stimulus.大鼠的二级强化作为刺激信息价值和可靠性的函数
J Exp Psychol. 1962 Aug;64:97-104. doi: 10.1037/h0040364.
3
Stimulus meaningfulness and paired-associate transfer: an encoding variability hypothesis.刺激意义性与配对联想迁移:一种编码变异性假说。
Psychol Rev. 1968 Sep;75(5):421-41. doi: 10.1037/h0026301.