• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疼痛反应偏好问卷的心理测量评估与完善

Psychometric evaluation and refinement of the Pain Response Preference Questionnaire.

作者信息

McWilliams Lachlan A, Kowal John, Sharpe Donald, Dick Bruce D

出版信息

Pain Res Manag. 2014 Jan-Feb;19(1):42-8. doi: 10.1155/2014/532678. Epub 2013 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1155/2014/532678
PMID:24205508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3938342/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Pain Response Preference Questionnaire (PRPQ) assesses preferences regarding pain-related social support. The initial factor analytical study of the PRPQ produced four empirically supported scales labelled Solicitude, Management, Encouragement and Suppression. A second study produced similar findings, but suggested that the Management and Encouragement scales be combined into a single scale labelled Activity Direction.

OBJECTIVES

To use factor analytical methods to evaluate these competing configurations of the PRPQ (ie, three versus four scales) and to further refine the measure. The ability of the PRPQ scales to account for pain severity and disability ratings was also evaluated.

METHODS

Chronic pain patients (n=201) completed the PRPQ along with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and self-reports of pain severity and disability.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that both models tested provided a poor fit to the data. A follow-up exploratory factor analysis was used to further refine the PRPQ scales and resulted in scales labelled Solicitude, Encouragement and Suppression. Supportive of the potential clinical utility of the PRPQ, Suppression was positively associated with pain severity and Solicitude was positively associated with disability. These two scales were also positively associated with the PCS. Supportive of the incremental validity of the PRPQ, a multiple regression analysis indicated that the Solicitude scale accounted for unique variance in disability ratings beyond that accounted for by demographic⁄clinical variables and the PCS.

CONCLUSIONS

The PRPQ has promise as a clinical assessment measure and for advancing research examining the interpersonal context of pain.

摘要

背景

疼痛反应偏好问卷(PRPQ)评估与疼痛相关的社会支持偏好。对PRPQ的初步因素分析研究产生了四个经实证支持的量表,分别标记为关怀、管理、鼓励和抑制。第二项研究得出了类似的结果,但建议将管理和鼓励量表合并为一个标记为活动指导的单一量表。

目的

使用因素分析方法评估PRPQ的这些竞争性结构(即三个量表与四个量表),并进一步完善该测量方法。还评估了PRPQ量表解释疼痛严重程度和残疾评分的能力。

方法

慢性疼痛患者(n = 201)完成了PRPQ以及疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)和疼痛严重程度及残疾的自我报告。

结果

验证性因素分析表明,所测试的两个模型均与数据拟合不佳。后续的探索性因素分析用于进一步完善PRPQ量表,结果产生了标记为关怀、鼓励和抑制的量表。支持PRPQ的潜在临床效用,抑制与疼痛严重程度呈正相关,关怀与残疾呈正相关。这两个量表也与PCS呈正相关。支持PRPQ的增量效度,多元回归分析表明,关怀量表解释了残疾评分中超出人口统计学/临床变量和PCS所解释的独特方差。

结论

PRPQ有望作为一种临床评估措施,并用于推进对疼痛人际背景的研究。

相似文献

1
Psychometric evaluation and refinement of the Pain Response Preference Questionnaire.疼痛反应偏好问卷的心理测量评估与完善
Pain Res Manag. 2014 Jan-Feb;19(1):42-8. doi: 10.1155/2014/532678. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
2
A psychometric evaluation of the Pain Response Preference Questionnaire in a chronic pain patient sample.中文版:《慢性疼痛患者样本中疼痛反应偏好问卷的心理计量学评估》。
Health Psychol. 2012 May;31(3):343-351. doi: 10.1037/a0027014. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
3
Development and psychometric evaluation of a new measure of pain-related support preferences: the Pain Response Preference Questionnaire.开发并心理计量评估一种新的疼痛相关支持偏好测量工具:疼痛反应偏好问卷。
Pain Res Manag. 2009 Nov-Dec;14(6):461-9. doi: 10.1155/2009/429767.
4
A longitudinal investigation of pain-related social support preferences in a chronic pain treatment sample.对慢性疼痛治疗样本中与疼痛相关的社会支持偏好的纵向调查。
Clin J Pain. 2014 Aug;30(8):672-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000435446.89019.f3.
5
Factor structure and internal consistency of a Swedish version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale.《疼痛灾难化量表瑞典文版的因子结构和内部一致性》。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Feb;63(2):259-266. doi: 10.1111/aas.13246. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
6
Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire for Iranian People With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain.伊朗非特异性慢性颈痛人群应对策略问卷波斯文版的验证性因子分析、信度和效度。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Jan;44(1):72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
7
Factor structure and invariance of the pain catastrophizing scale in patients with chronic pain and their spouses.慢性疼痛患者及其配偶的疼痛灾难化量表的因子结构和不变性。
Rehabil Psychol. 2021 Feb;66(1):50-56. doi: 10.1037/rep0000322. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
8
Development and evaluation of short forms of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire.疼痛灾难化量表和疼痛自我效能问卷简版的编制与评估
Eur J Pain. 2015 Oct;19(9):1342-9. doi: 10.1002/ejp.665. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
9
Abbreviated psychologic questionnaires are valid in patients with hand conditions.简化的心理问卷在手部疾病患者中是有效的。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Dec;471(12):4037-44. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3213-2. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
10
Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of Hindi Version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain for Use in India.慢性下腰痛患者疼痛灾难化量表印地语版本在印度使用的翻译、改编及验证
Pain Med. 2016 Oct;17(10):1848-1858. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnv103. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

本文引用的文献

1
A psychometric evaluation of the Pain Response Preference Questionnaire in a chronic pain patient sample.中文版:《慢性疼痛患者样本中疼痛反应偏好问卷的心理计量学评估》。
Health Psychol. 2012 May;31(3):343-351. doi: 10.1037/a0027014. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
2
Development and psychometric evaluation of a new measure of pain-related support preferences: the Pain Response Preference Questionnaire.开发并心理计量评估一种新的疼痛相关支持偏好测量工具:疼痛反应偏好问卷。
Pain Res Manag. 2009 Nov-Dec;14(6):461-9. doi: 10.1155/2009/429767.
3
Social interaction in pain: reinforcing pain behaviors or building intimacy?疼痛中的社会互动:强化疼痛行为还是建立亲密关系?
Pain. 2010 Apr;149(1):9-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.010. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
4
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
5
Examination of perceived spouse responses to patient well and pain behavior in patients with headache.对头痛患者配偶对患者健康及疼痛行为的感知反应的调查。
Clin J Pain. 2008 Oct;24(8):654-61. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31817708ea.
6
Pain-related catastrophizing and perceived social responses: Inter-relationships in the context of chronic pain.疼痛灾难化与感知到的社会反应:慢性疼痛背景下的相互关系
Pain. 2007 Feb;127(3):234-242. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.08.018. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
7
Effects of suppression, acceptance and spontaneous coping on pain tolerance, pain intensity and distress.抑制、接纳和自发应对方式对疼痛耐受性、疼痛强度及痛苦的影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Feb;45(2):199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.02.006. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
8
Chronic pain couples: perceived marital interactions and pain behaviours.慢性疼痛夫妻:感知到的婚姻互动与疼痛行为
Pain. 2006 Jul;123(1-2):53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.009. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
9
The development and psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess spouse responses to pain and well behavior in patients with chronic pain: the Spouse Response Inventory.一种用于评估配偶对慢性疼痛患者疼痛及良好行为反应的工具的开发与心理测量学评价:配偶反应量表。
J Pain. 2005 Apr;6(4):243-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.12.010.
10
Pain catastrophizing and social support in married individuals with chronic pain: the moderating role of pain duration.慢性疼痛已婚个体的疼痛灾难化与社会支持:疼痛持续时间的调节作用
Pain. 2004 Aug;110(3):656-664. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.05.004.