Drug Developmental Research Laboratories, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 3-1-1 Futaba-cho, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan; Department of Veterinary Science, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Osaka Prefecture University, 1-58 Rinkuu Ourai Kita, Izumisano, Osaka 598-8531, Japan.
Drug Developmental Research Laboratories, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 3-1-1 Futaba-cho, Toyonaka, Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
Toxicology. 2014 Jan 6;315:8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
The in vitro mammalian cytogenetic tests monitor chromosomal aberrations in cultured mammalian cells to test the mutagenicity of compounds. Although these tests are especially useful for evaluating the potential clastogenic effects of chemicals, false positives associated with excessive toxicity occur frequently. There is a growing demand for mechanism-based assays to confirm positive results from cytogenetic tests. We hypothesized that a toxicogenomic approach that is based on gene expression profiles could be used to investigate mechanisms of genotoxicity. Human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells were treated with each of eight different genotoxins that included six DNA damaging compounds-mitomycin C, methyl methanesulfonate, ethyl methanesulfonate, cisplatin, etoposide, hydroxyurea-and two compounds that do not damage DNA-colchicine and adenine. Cells were exposed to each compound for 4h, and Affymetrix U133A microarrays were then used to comprehensively examine gene expression. A statistical analysis was used to select biomarker candidates, and 103 probes met our statistical criteria. Expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (CDKN1A)/p21 was ranked highest for discriminating DNA-damaging compounds. To further characterize the biological significance of alterations in gene expression, functional network analysis was performed with the 103 selected probes. Interestingly, a CDKN1A-centered interactome was identified as the most significant network. Together, these findings indicated that DNA-damaging compounds often induced changes in the expression of a large number of these 103 probes and that upregulation of CDKN1A was a common key feature of DNA damage stimuli. The utility of CDKN1A as a biomarker for assessing the genotoxicity of drug candidates was further evaluated; specifically, quantitative RT-PCR was used to assess the effects of 14 additional compounds-including DNA damaging genotoxins and genotoxins that do not damage DNA and five newly-synthesized drug candidates-on CDKN1A expression. In these assays, DNA damage-positive clastogens were clearly separated from DNA damage-negative compounds based on CDKN1A expression. In conclusion, CDKN1A may be a valuable biomarker for identifying DNA damage-inducing clastogens and as a follow-up assay for mammalian cytogenetic tests.
体外哺乳动物细胞遗传学检测通过监测培养的哺乳动物细胞中的染色体畸变来检测化合物的致突变性。虽然这些检测对于评估化学物质潜在的断裂剂效应特别有用,但由于毒性过高而导致的假阳性经常发生。人们越来越需要基于机制的检测来确认细胞遗传学检测的阳性结果。我们假设,一种基于基因表达谱的毒理基因组学方法可用于研究遗传毒性的机制。用人淋巴母细胞 TK6 细胞分别用包括 6 种 DNA 损伤化合物(丝裂霉素 C、甲基甲磺酸酯、乙基甲磺酸酯、顺铂、依托泊苷、羟基脲)和 2 种不损伤 DNA 的化合物(秋水仙碱和腺嘌呤)的 8 种不同遗传毒物处理细胞。细胞暴露于每种化合物 4 小时,然后使用 Affymetrix U133A 微阵列全面检查基因表达。统计分析用于选择生物标志物候选物,有 103 个探针符合我们的统计标准。CDKN1A/p21 是区分 DNA 损伤化合物的最高探针。为了进一步表征基因表达改变的生物学意义,对这 103 个选定探针进行了功能网络分析。有趣的是,以 CDKN1A 为中心的相互作用网络被确定为最重要的网络。总之,这些发现表明,DNA 损伤化合物通常会诱导这 103 个探针中的大量探针的表达发生变化,而 CDKN1A 的上调是 DNA 损伤刺激的一个共同关键特征。进一步评估了 CDKN1A 作为评估候选药物遗传毒性的生物标志物的效用;具体来说,使用定量 RT-PCR 评估了 14 种其他化合物(包括 DNA 损伤遗传毒物和不损伤 DNA 的遗传毒物以及 5 种新合成的候选药物)对 CDKN1A 表达的影响。在这些测定中,基于 CDKN1A 表达,DNA 损伤阳性断裂剂明显与 DNA 损伤阴性化合物分离。总之,CDKN1A 可能是一种有价值的生物标志物,可用于识别诱导 DNA 损伤的断裂剂,并作为哺乳动物细胞遗传学检测的后续检测。