• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用剂量优化和信息学策略在人类细胞中开发用于遗传毒性的毒理基因组学特征。

Development of a toxicogenomics signature for genotoxicity using a dose-optimization and informatics strategy in human cells.

作者信息

Li Heng-Hong, Hyduke Daniel R, Chen Renxiang, Heard Pamela, Yauk Carole L, Aubrecht Jiri, Fornace Albert J

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cellular Biology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.

Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Environ Mol Mutagen. 2015 Jul;56(6):505-19. doi: 10.1002/em.21941. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1002/em.21941
PMID:25733355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4506269/
Abstract

The development of in vitro molecular biomarkers to accurately predict toxicological effects has become a priority to advance testing strategies for human health risk assessment. The application of in vitro transcriptomic biomarkers promises increased throughput as well as a reduction in animal use. However, the existing protocols for predictive transcriptional signatures do not establish appropriate guidelines for dose selection or account for the fact that toxic agents may have pleiotropic effects. Therefore, comparison of transcriptome profiles across agents and studies has been difficult. Here we present a dataset of transcriptional profiles for TK6 cells exposed to a battery of well-characterized genotoxic and nongenotoxic chemicals. The experimental conditions applied a new dose optimization protocol that was based on evaluating expression changes in several well-characterized stress-response genes using quantitative real-time PCR in preliminary dose-finding studies. The subsequent microarray-based transcriptomic analyses at the optimized dose revealed responses to the test chemicals that were typically complex, often exhibiting substantial overlap in the transcriptional responses between a variety of the agents making analysis challenging. Using the nearest shrunken centroids method we identified a panel of 65 genes that could accurately classify toxicants as genotoxic or nongenotoxic. To validate the 65-gene panel as a genomic biomarker of genotoxicity, the gene expression profiles of an additional three well-characterized model agents were analyzed and a case study demonstrating the practical application of this genomic biomarker-based approach in risk assessment was performed to demonstrate its utility in genotoxicity risk assessment.

摘要

开发能够准确预测毒理学效应的体外分子生物标志物,已成为推进人类健康风险评估测试策略的首要任务。体外转录组生物标志物的应用有望提高通量并减少动物使用。然而,现有的预测转录特征方案并未为剂量选择制定适当的指导方针,也未考虑到有毒物质可能具有多效性这一事实。因此,跨试剂和研究比较转录组图谱一直很困难。在此,我们展示了一组TK6细胞暴露于一系列特征明确的遗传毒性和非遗传毒性化学物质后的转录图谱数据集。实验条件采用了一种新的剂量优化方案,该方案基于在初步剂量探索研究中使用定量实时PCR评估几个特征明确的应激反应基因的表达变化。随后在优化剂量下基于微阵列的转录组分析揭示了对测试化学物质的反应通常很复杂,不同试剂之间的转录反应往往存在大量重叠,这使得分析具有挑战性。使用最近收缩质心法,我们鉴定出一组65个基因,它们可以准确地将有毒物质分类为遗传毒性或非遗传毒性。为了验证这65个基因组成的基因集作为遗传毒性的基因组生物标志物,我们分析了另外三种特征明确的模型试剂的基因表达谱,并进行了一个案例研究,以证明这种基于基因组生物标志物的方法在风险评估中的实际应用,从而展示其在遗传毒性风险评估中的效用。

相似文献

1
Development of a toxicogenomics signature for genotoxicity using a dose-optimization and informatics strategy in human cells.利用剂量优化和信息学策略在人类细胞中开发用于遗传毒性的毒理基因组学特征。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2015 Jul;56(6):505-19. doi: 10.1002/em.21941. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
2
Integration of metabolic activation with a predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus nongenotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells.整合代谢活化与预测性毒理基因组学特征以对人类TK6细胞中的遗传毒性与非遗传毒性化学物质进行分类。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2015 Jul;56(6):520-34. doi: 10.1002/em.21940. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
3
Utilization of CDKN1A/p21 gene for class discrimination of DNA damage-induced clastogenicity.利用 CDKN1A/p21 基因进行 DNA 损伤诱导的断裂剂类别的分类判别。
Toxicology. 2014 Jan 6;315:8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
4
A predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus non-genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells.一种用于在人类TK6细胞中区分遗传毒性与非遗传毒性化学物质的预测性毒理基因组学特征。
Data Brief. 2015 Aug 24;5:77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2015.08.013. eCollection 2015 Dec.
5
Application of toxicogenomics to genetic toxicology risk assessment.毒理基因组学在遗传毒理学风险评估中的应用。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2007 Jun;48(5):369-79. doi: 10.1002/em.20304.
6
Application of the TGx-28.65 transcriptomic biomarker to classify genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells in the presence of rat liver S9.在大鼠肝脏S9存在的情况下,应用TGx-28.65转录组生物标志物对人TK6细胞中的遗传毒性和非遗传毒性化学物质进行分类。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2016 May;57(4):243-60. doi: 10.1002/em.22004. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
7
Inferring transcription factor activity from microarray data reveals novel targets for toxicological investigations.从微阵列数据推断转录因子活性可为毒理学研究揭示新的靶点。
Toxicology. 2017 Aug 15;389:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
8
Exploiting microRNA and mRNA profiles generated in vitro from carcinogen-exposed primary mouse hepatocytes for predicting in vivo genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.利用从暴露于致癌物的原代小鼠肝细胞体外生成的微小RNA和信使核糖核酸谱来预测体内遗传毒性和致癌性。
Mutagenesis. 2016 Sep;31(5):603-15. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gew027. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
9
Assessment of the performance of the TGx-DDI biomarker to detect DNA damage-inducing agents using quantitative RT-PCR in TK6 cells.使用定量逆转录聚合酶链反应在TK6细胞中评估TGx-DDI生物标志物检测DNA损伤诱导剂的性能。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2019 Mar;60(2):122-133. doi: 10.1002/em.22257. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
10
Identification of potential biomarkers of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells by cDNA microarray analysis.通过cDNA微阵列分析鉴定L5178Y小鼠淋巴瘤细胞中遗传毒性和致癌性的潜在生物标志物。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2005;45(1):80-9. doi: 10.1002/em.20077.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating Transcriptomic and Targeted New Approach Methodologies into a Tiered Framework for Chemical Bioactivity Screening.将转录组学和靶向新方法整合到化学生物活性筛选的分层框架中。
Environ Health Perspect. 2025 Jun;133(6):67013. doi: 10.1289/EHP16024. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
2
Deciphering per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances mode of action: comparative gene expression analysis in human liver spheroids.解读全氟和多氟烷基物质的作用模式:人肝球状体中的比较基因表达分析
Toxicol Sci. 2025 May 1;205(1):124-142. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfaf023.
3
Review of Transcriptomic Biomarkers That Predict In Vitro Genotoxicity in Human Cell Lines.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of chemical mutagens and carcinogens on gene expression profiles in human TK6 cells.化学诱变剂和致癌剂对人 TK6 细胞基因表达谱的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039205. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
2
Integrating transcriptomics and metabonomics to unravel modes-of-action of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in HepG2 cells.整合转录组学和代谢组学以揭示2,3,7,8-四氯二苯并对二恶英(TCDD)在人肝癌细胞系HepG2中的作用模式。
BMC Syst Biol. 2011 Aug 31;5:139. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-139.
3
Comparison of phenotypic and transcriptomic effects of false-positive genotoxins, true genotoxins and non-genotoxins using HepG2 cells.
预测人类细胞系体外遗传毒性的转录组生物标志物综述。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2025 Mar 4. doi: 10.1002/em.70004.
4
Non-clinical safety assessment of leaf extract: evaluation of genotoxicity.叶提取物的非临床安全性评估:遗传毒性评价
Toxicol Res. 2024 May 16;40(3):473-485. doi: 10.1007/s43188-024-00241-4. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Application of HepaRG cells for genotoxicity assessment: a review.HepaRG 细胞在遗传毒性评估中的应用:综述。
J Environ Sci Health C Toxicol Carcinog. 2024;42(3):214-237. doi: 10.1080/26896583.2024.2331956. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
6
Unlocking the Power of Transcriptomic Biomarkers in Qualitative and Quantitative Genotoxicity Assessment of Chemicals.解锁转录组生物标志物在化学品定性和定量遗传毒性评估中的作用。
Chem Res Toxicol. 2024 Mar 18;37(3):465-475. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00318. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
7
Evaluation of weak genotoxicity of hydroxychloroquine in human TK6 cells.羟氯喹在人TK6细胞中的弱遗传毒性评估。
Toxicol Lett. 2024 Mar;393:84-95. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
8
Editorial: toxicogenomics (TGx) in hazard and risk assessment.社论:毒理基因组学在危害和风险评估中的应用
Front Toxicol. 2023 Sep 5;5:1284932. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2023.1284932. eCollection 2023.
9
Application of a new approach methodology (NAM)-based strategy for genotoxicity assessment of data-poor compounds.一种基于新方法学(NAM)的策略在数据匮乏化合物遗传毒性评估中的应用。
Front Toxicol. 2023 Jan 23;5:1098432. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2023.1098432. eCollection 2023.
10
Integrated Genotoxicity Testing of three anti-infective drugs using the TGx-DDI transcriptomic biomarker and high-throughput CometChip assay in TK6 cells.使用TGx-DDI转录组生物标志物和高通量彗星芯片分析法在TK6细胞中对三种抗感染药物进行综合遗传毒性测试。
Front Toxicol. 2022 Sep 23;4:991590. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2022.991590. eCollection 2022.
使用 HepG2 细胞比较假阳性遗传毒性物、真遗传毒性物和非遗传毒性物的表型和转录组效应。
Mutagenesis. 2011 Sep;26(5):593-604. doi: 10.1093/mutage/ger021. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
4
Food for Thought ... on mapping the human toxome.值得深思……关于人类毒物组图谱绘制。
ALTEX. 2011;28(2):83-93. doi: 10.14573/altex.2011.2.083.
5
Similarity of the DNA-damage responsiveness and growth-suppressive properties of waf1/cip1 and gadd45.waf1/cip1与gadd45在DNA损伤反应性和生长抑制特性方面的相似性。
Int J Oncol. 1995 May;6(5):937-46. doi: 10.3892/ijo.6.5.937.
6
Utilizing toxicogenomic data to understand chemical mechanism of action in risk assessment.利用毒理基因组学数据来理解风险评估中化学作用的机制。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013 Sep 15;271(3):299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.01.017. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
7
New and emerging technologies for genetic toxicity testing.用于遗传毒性测试的新技术和新兴技术。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2011 Apr;52(3):205-23. doi: 10.1002/em.20614. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
8
Voluntary exploratory data submissions to the US FDA and the EMA: experience and impact.自愿向美国 FDA 和 EMA 提交探索性数据:经验与影响。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010 Jun;9(6):435-45. doi: 10.1038/nrd3116.
9
Use of transcriptomics in understanding mechanisms of drug-induced toxicity.转录组学在药物诱导毒性机制理解中的应用。
Pharmacogenomics. 2010 Apr;11(4):573-85. doi: 10.2217/pgs.10.37.
10
Characterization and interlaboratory comparison of a gene expression signature for differentiating genotoxic mechanisms.用于区分遗传毒性机制的基因表达特征的表征及实验室间比较
Toxicol Sci. 2009 Aug;110(2):341-52. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp103. Epub 2009 May 22.