Westerink Walter M A, Stevenson Joe C R, Lauwers Annick, Griffioen Gerard, Horbach G Jean, Schoonen Willem G E J
Department of Pharmacology, Schering-Plough Research Institute, P.O. Box 20, 5342 CC Oss, The Netherlands.
Mutat Res. 2009 May 31;676(1-2):113-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.04.008. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
The Vitotox and RadarScreen assays were evaluated as early screens for mutagenicity and clastogenicity, respectively. The Vitotox assay is a bacterial reporter assay in Salmonella typhimurium based on the SOS-response, and it contains a luciferase gene under control of the recN promoter. The RadarScreen assay is a RAD54 promoter-linked beta-galactosidase reporter assay in yeast. The expression of this beta-galactosidase can easily be quantified by use of the substrate d-luciferin-o-beta-galactopyranoside, which is converted into galactose and luciferin that can be measured luminometrically. Recently, an ECVAM workgroup defined a list of 20 genotoxic and 42 non-genotoxic compounds [D. Kirkland, P. Kasper, L. Muller, R. Corvi, G. Speit, Recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests: a follow-up to an ECVAM workshop, Mutat. Res. 653 (2008) 99-108.] that can be used for the validation and/or optimization of in vitro genotoxicity assays. In the present study, this compound set was used for the validation of the assays. Moreover, an additional set of 192 compounds was used to broaden this validation study. The compounds of this additional set can be classified as non-genotoxins and genotoxins and consists of both in-house and reference compounds. In case of the ECVAM compound list, the results from the Vitotox and RadarScreen assays were compared to the genotoxic/non-genotoxic classification of the compounds in this list. In case of the additionally tested compounds, the results of the Vitotox and RadarScreen assays were compared, respectively, with bacterial mutagenicity (Ames) results or in vitro clastogenicity data obtained in-house or from the literature. The validation with respect to the ECVAM compound list resulted in a sensitivity for both the Vitotox and RadarScreen assay of 70% (14/20). If both assays were combined the sensitivity increased to 85% (17/20). Both tests also gave a low number of false positive results. The specificity of the Vitotox and RadarScreen assays was 93% (39/42) and 83% (35/42), respectively. This resulted in a predictivity of the Vitotox and RadarScreen assay of 85% (53/62) and 79% (49/62), respectively. In case both tests were combined the specificity and the predictivity of the Vitotox and RadarScreen assay turned out to be 81% (34/42) and 82% (51/62), respectively. The results from the additional list of 192 compounds confirmed the results found with the ECVAM compound list. The results from the Vitotox assay showed a high correlation with Ames test of 91% (132/145). Subsequently, the RadarScreen assay had a correlation with in vitro clastogenicity of 76% (93/123). The specificity of the Vitotox assay was 94% (90/96) for Ames test results and that of the RadarScreen assay was 74% (34/46) for clastogenicity. Moreover, the sensitivities of the Vitotox and RadarScreen assays were 86% (42/49) and 77% (59/77), respectively. Implementation of the Vitotox and RadarScreen assays in the early research phase of drug development can lead to fast de-selection for genotoxicity. It is expected that this application will reduce the number of compounds that have a positive score in the regulatory Ames and clastogenicity tests. Moreover, problems with a complete compound class can be foreseen at an early time point in the research phase, which gives more time for issue resolution than late detection of these problems with the regulatory tests.
分别对Vitotox和RadarScreen检测方法进行了评估,将其作为诱变性和染色体断裂毒性的早期筛选方法。Vitotox检测是一种基于鼠伤寒沙门氏菌SOS反应的细菌报告基因检测方法,它包含一个在recN启动子控制下的荧光素酶基因。RadarScreen检测是一种酵母中与RAD54启动子相连的β-半乳糖苷酶报告基因检测方法。这种β-半乳糖苷酶的表达可以通过使用底物d-荧光素-o-β-吡喃半乳糖苷轻松定量,该底物可转化为半乳糖和荧光素,可通过发光法进行测量。最近,一个欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)工作组确定了一份包含20种遗传毒性化合物和42种非遗传毒性化合物的清单[D.柯克兰德、P.卡斯珀、L.米勒、R.科尔维、G.施佩特,用于评估新的或改进的遗传毒性检测方法性能的遗传毒性和非遗传毒性化学物质推荐清单:ECVAM研讨会的后续报告,《突变研究》653(2008)99 - 108],这些化合物可用于体外遗传毒性检测方法的验证和/或优化。在本研究中,使用该化合物集对检测方法进行验证。此外,还使用了另外一组192种化合物来拓宽这项验证研究。这组额外的化合物可分为非遗传毒素和遗传毒素,包括内部化合物和参考化合物。对于ECVAM化合物清单,将Vitotox和RadarScreen检测的结果与该清单中化合物的遗传毒性/非遗传毒性分类进行比较。对于额外测试的化合物,分别将Vitotox和RadarScreen检测的结果与细菌诱变性(Ames)结果或内部获得的或来自文献的体外染色体断裂毒性数据进行比较。针对ECVAM化合物清单的验证结果表明,Vitotox检测和RadarScreen检测的灵敏度均为70%(14/20)。如果将两种检测方法结合起来,灵敏度会提高到85%(17/20)。两种检测方法的假阳性结果数量也都较低。Vitotox检测和RadarScreen检测的特异性分别为93%(39/42)和83%(35/42)。这使得Vitotox检测和RadarScreen检测的预测率分别为85%(53/62)和79%(49/62)。如果将两种检测方法结合起来,Vitotox和RadarScreen检测的特异性和预测率分别为81%(34/42)和82%(51/62)。来自192种化合物额外清单的结果证实了使用ECVAM化合物清单所得到的结果。Vitotox检测的结果与Ames试验的相关性很高,为91%(132/145)。随后,RadarScreen检测与体外染色体断裂毒性的相关性为76%(93/123)。Vitotox检测对于Ames试验结果的特异性为94%(90/96),RadarScreen检测对于染色体断裂毒性的特异性为74%(34/46)。此外,Vitotox检测和RadarScreen检测的灵敏度分别为86%(42/49)和77%(59/77)。在药物研发的早期研究阶段实施Vitotox和RadarScreen检测方法可以快速排除遗传毒性。预计这种应用将减少在监管的Ames试验和染色体断裂毒性试验中获得阳性评分的化合物数量。此外,在研究阶段的早期就可以预见整个化合物类别的问题,这比在监管试验中后期发现这些问题能有更多时间来解决问题。