Department of Psychology, University of Western Australia, 6009, Nedlands, Australia.
Mem Cognit. 1973 Dec;1(4):449-53. doi: 10.3758/BF03208907.
Forty Ss were given a continuous recognition memory test in which each word was presented twice, either in the same print or in different print on the two occasions. The results showed that (a) recognition performance was facilitated to a small but statistically significant extent in the same-print condition and that (b) Ss could reliably report first presentation print for recognized items for at least 1(1/2) rain. In a second experiment, the stimuli used were nonsense strings of. from five to seven letters instead of words. This manipulation increased the same-print advantage in recognition but reduced Ss' ability to report first print form. The results indicate that information about the physical features of verbal stimuli is retained in a visual code that is partially' or wholly independent of the verbal code for the same stimuli. The results are inconsistent with the conclusion that the visual code is stored only as a dependent attribute of the verbal code in memory.
40 名被试接受了连续识别记忆测试，每个单词呈现两次，要么两次都以相同的印刷体呈现，要么两次都以不同的印刷体呈现。结果表明：（a）在相同印刷体条件下，识别表现略有但统计学上显著提高；（b）被试可以可靠地报告至少 1(1/2) 分钟内识别项目的首次呈现印刷体。在第二个实验中，使用的刺激物是由五个到七个字母组成的无意义字符串，而不是单词。这种操作增加了识别中的相同印刷体优势，但降低了被试报告首次印刷体形式的能力。结果表明，言语刺激的物理特征信息以部分或完全独立于相同刺激的言语代码的视觉代码保留。结果与视觉代码仅作为记忆中言语代码的从属属性存储的结论不一致。
