Mayampurath Anoop, Carey Kyle, Palama Brett, Gonzalez Monica, Reid Joe, Bartlett Allison H, Churpek Matthew, Edelson Dana, Jani Priti
Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025 Feb 1;26(2):e146-e154. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003656. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
To describe the deployment of pediatric Calculated Assessment of Risk and Triage (pCART), a machine learning (ML) model to predict the risk of the direct ward to the ICU transfer within 12 hours, and the associated improved outcomes among hospitalized children.
Pre- vs. post-implementation study.
An urban, tertiary-care, academic hospital.
Pediatric (age < 18 yr) admissions from May 1, 2019, to April 30, 2023.
None.
Patients were divided into baseline, pre-pCART implementation (May 1, 2019, to April 30 2021), and post-pCART implementation (May 1, 2021, to April 30, 2023) cohorts. First-ward admissions with a high-risk score (pCART score ≥ 92) were considered as the main cohort. The primary outcome was the occurrence of critical events, defined as invasive mechanical ventilation, vasoactive drug administration, or death within 12 hours of the first high-risk pCART score. There were 2763 and 3943 patients in the baseline and implementation cohorts, respectively. pCART implementation was associated with a decrease in the percentage of the primary outcome from baseline 1.4% to 0.4% (p < 0.001), which converted to more than two-thirds lower adjusted odds of the primary outcome (odds ratio, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.11-0.40]; p < 0.001). pCART implementation was also associated with a decreased prevalence of critical events at 24 and 48 hours after a first high-risk score. We failed to identify any association between cohort period and overall hospital and ICU length-of-stay, number of ICU transfers, and time to ICU transfer. However, there was a difference in hospital length-of-stay among a subpopulation of patients transferred to the ICU (median 6 vs. 7 d; p < 0.001). Analysis of compliance metrics indicates sustained compliance achievements over time.
The deployment of pCART, a ML-based pediatric risk stratification tool, for clinical decision support for pediatric ward patients, was associated with lower odds of critical events among high-risk patients.
描述儿科风险计算评估与分诊(pCART)的应用情况,这是一种机器学习(ML)模型,用于预测12小时内直接从病房转入重症监护病房(ICU)的风险,以及住院儿童相关的改善结局。
实施前与实施后的研究。
一家城市三级医疗学术医院。
2019年5月1日至2023年4月30日期间收治的儿科(年龄<18岁)患者。
无。
患者被分为基线组、pCART实施前(2019年5月1日至2021年4月30日)和pCART实施后(2021年5月1日至2023年4月30日)队列。首次病房入院且风险评分高(pCART评分≥92)的患者被视为主要队列。主要结局是危急事件的发生,定义为在首次高危pCART评分后12小时内进行有创机械通气、使用血管活性药物或死亡。基线队列和实施队列分别有2763例和3943例患者。pCART的实施与主要结局的百分比从基线时的1.4%降至0.4%相关(p<0.001),这转化为主要结局的调整后比值降低了三分之二以上(比值比,0.22[95%CI,0.11 - 0.40];p<0.001)。pCART的实施还与首次高危评分后24小时和48小时危急事件的患病率降低相关。我们未发现队列时期与总体住院时间和ICU住院时间、ICU转入次数以及转入ICU的时间之间存在任何关联。然而,转入ICU的患者亚组的住院时间存在差异(中位数分别为6天和7天;p<0.001)。对依从性指标的分析表明,随着时间推移,依从性持续达标。
基于机器学习的儿科风险分层工具pCART在儿科病房患者临床决策支持中的应用,与高危患者中危急事件的较低发生率相关。