Parshuram Christopher S, Dryden-Palmer Karen, Farrell Catherine, Gottesman Ronald, Gray Martin, Hutchison James S, Helfaer Mark, Hunt Elizabeth A, Joffe Ari R, Lacroix Jacques, Moga Michael Alice, Nadkarni Vinay, Ninis Nelly, Parkin Patricia C, Wensley David, Willan Andrew R, Tomlinson George A
Critical Care Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1002-1012. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0948.
There is limited evidence that the use of severity of illness scores in pediatric patients can facilitate timely admission to the intensive care unit or improve patient outcomes.
To determine the effect of the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System (BedsidePEWS) on all-cause hospital mortality and late admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), cardiac arrest, and ICU resource use.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter cluster randomized trial of 21 hospitals located in 7 countries (Belgium, Canada, England, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, and the Netherlands) that provided inpatient pediatric care for infants (gestational age ≥37 weeks) to teenagers (aged ≤18 years). Participating hospitals had continuous physician staffing and subspecialized pediatric services. Patient enrollment began on February 28, 2011, and ended on June 21, 2015. Follow-up ended on July 19, 2015.
The BedsidePEWS intervention (10 hospitals) was compared with usual care (no severity of illness score; 11 hospitals).
The primary outcome was all-cause hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was a significant clinical deterioration event, which was defined as a composite outcome reflecting late ICU admission. Regression analyses accounted for hospital-level clustering and baseline rates.
Among 144 539 patient discharges at 21 randomized hospitals, there were 559 443 patient-days and 144 539 patients (100%) completed the trial. All-cause hospital mortality was 1.93 per 1000 patient discharges at hospitals with BedsidePEWS and 1.56 per 1000 patient discharges at hospitals with usual care (adjusted between-group rate difference, 0.01 [95% CI, -0.80 to 0.81 per 1000 patient discharges]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.61 to 1.69]; P = .96). Significant clinical deterioration events occurred during 0.50 per 1000 patient-days at hospitals with BedsidePEWS vs 0.84 per 1000 patient-days at hospitals with usual care (adjusted between-group rate difference, -0.34 [95% CI, -0.73 to 0.05 per 1000 patient-days]; adjusted rate ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.97]; P = .03).
Implementation of the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System compared with usual care did not significantly decrease all-cause mortality among hospitalized pediatric patients. These findings do not support the use of this system to reduce mortality.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01260831.
关于在儿科患者中使用疾病严重程度评分能否促进及时入住重症监护病房或改善患者预后的证据有限。
确定床边儿科早期预警系统(BedsidePEWS)对全因住院死亡率、延迟入住重症监护病房(ICU)、心脏骤停及ICU资源使用的影响。
设计、设置和参与者:一项多中心整群随机试验,涉及位于7个国家(比利时、加拿大、英格兰、爱尔兰、意大利、新西兰和荷兰)的21家医院,这些医院为孕周≥37周的婴儿至18岁青少年提供儿科住院治疗。参与医院有持续的医生配备和专科儿科服务。患者入组于2011年2月28日开始,2015年6月21日结束。随访于2015年7月19日结束。
将BedsidePEWS干预组(10家医院)与常规治疗组(不使用疾病严重程度评分;11家医院)进行比较。
主要结局是全因住院死亡率。次要结局是严重临床恶化事件,定义为反映延迟入住ICU的综合结局。回归分析考虑了医院层面的聚类和基线率。
在21家随机分组医院的144539例患者出院中,共有559443个患者日,144539例患者(100%)完成试验。使用BedsidePEWS的医院每1000例患者出院的全因住院死亡率为1.93,常规治疗医院为1.56(调整后的组间率差为0.01[95%CI,每1000例患者出院-0.80至0.81];调整后的优势比为1.01[95%CI,0.61至1.69];P = 0.96)。使用BedsidePEWS的医院每1000个患者日发生严重临床恶化事件的比例为0.50,常规治疗医院为0.84(调整后的组间率差为-0.34[95%CI,每1000个患者日-0.73至0.05];调整后的率比为0.77[95%CI,0.61至0.97];P = 0.03)。
与常规治疗相比,实施床边儿科早期预警系统并未显著降低住院儿科患者的全因死亡率。这些发现不支持使用该系统来降低死亡率。
clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01260831。