Habersaat Stephanie, Monnier Maryline, Peter Camille, Bolomey Luce, Borghini Ayala, Despars Josée, Pierrehumbert Blaise, Müller-Nix Carole, Ansermet François, Hohlfeld Judith
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013 Nov;50(6):704-12. doi: 10.1597/12-094.1.
Objective : The main objective of this study was to assess mother-child patterns of interaction in relation to later quality of attachment in a group of children with an orofacial cleft compared with children without cleft. Design : Families were contacted when the child was 2 months old for a direct assessment of mother-child interaction and then at 12 months for a direct assessment of the child's attachment. Data concerning socioeconomical information and posttraumatic stress symptoms in mothers were collected at the first appointment. Participants : Forty families of children with a cleft and 45 families of children without cleft were included in the study. Families were recruited at birth in the University Hospital of Lausanne. Results : Results showed that children with a cleft were more difficult and less cooperative during interaction at 2 months of age with their mother compared with children without a cleft. No significant differences were found in mothers or in dyadic interactive styles. Concerning the child's attachment at 12 months old, no differences were found in attachment security. However, secure children with a cleft were significantly more avoidant with their mother during the reunion episodes than secure children without cleft. Conclusion : Despite the facial disfigurement and the stress engendered by treatment during the first months of the infant's life, children with cleft and their mothers are doing as well as families without cleft with regard to the mothers' mental health, mother-child relationships, and later quality of attachment. A potential contribution for this absence of difference may be the pluridisciplinary support that families of children with cleft benefit from in Lausanne.
本研究的主要目的是评估一组患有口腔面部裂隙的儿童与无裂隙儿童相比,其母婴互动模式与后期依恋质量的关系。
当孩子2个月大时联系家庭,对母婴互动进行直接评估,然后在12个月时对孩子的依恋进行直接评估。在首次预约时收集有关母亲的社会经济信息和创伤后应激症状的数据。
本研究纳入了40个患有裂隙的儿童家庭和45个无裂隙的儿童家庭。这些家庭是在洛桑大学医院出生时招募的。
结果显示,与无裂隙儿童相比,患有裂隙的儿童在2个月大时与母亲互动时更难相处且合作性更低。在母亲或二元互动方式方面未发现显著差异。关于12个月大儿童的依恋情况,在依恋安全性方面未发现差异。然而,患有裂隙的安全型儿童在团聚阶段比无裂隙的安全型儿童对母亲明显更回避。
尽管婴儿出生后头几个月存在面部畸形和治疗带来的压力,但患有裂隙的儿童及其母亲在母亲心理健康、母婴关系和后期依恋质量方面与无裂隙家庭表现相当。这种无差异的潜在原因可能是洛桑患有裂隙儿童的家庭受益于多学科支持。