• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇产科医生对扩大携带者检测和无创产前检测的实践与看法。

Obstetricians and gynecologists' practice and opinions of expanded carrier testing and noninvasive prenatal testing.

作者信息

Benn Peter, Chapman Audrey R, Erickson Kristine, Defrancesco Mark S, Wilkins-Haug Louise, Egan James F X, Schulkin Jay

机构信息

Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 2014 Feb;34(2):145-52. doi: 10.1002/pd.4272. Epub 2013 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1002/pd.4272
PMID:24222397
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to assess the opinions of Fellows of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists on expanded carrier testing (molecular detection of >100 genetic diseases of variable severity) and noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT).

METHODS

A survey conducted between March and August 2012, assessed current use of testing, provision of genetic counseling, types of disorders that should be identified, preferences for future use, ethical aspects, and views on regulatory oversight.

RESULTS

Expanded carrier testing was offered to all patients by 15% of the responders and 52.1% upon patient request. Most (67.3%) favored testing only for mutations of known significance. In this study, 79.1% supported the use of NIPT as a screen for Down syndrome for all women with 47.9% viewing NIPT as a complete substitution for invasive testing. Most supported expansion to other aneuploidies (97.5%) and severe early-onset Mendelian disorders (90.4%) but not for adult-onset disorders (29.8%) or nonmedical sex identification (15.7%). A majority (73.2%) believed that NIPT would increase pregnancy terminations for mild disease states. Respondents favored a role for professional societies in providing regulatory oversight.

CONCLUSION

Rapid incorporation of new genetic technologies may be limited by the availability of genetic counseling, concerns regarding inclusion of clinically mild disorders, results of unknown significance, and costs.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估美国妇产科医师学会会员对扩展携带者检测(对100多种严重程度各异的遗传疾病进行分子检测)和无创产前检测(NIPT)的看法。

方法

2012年3月至8月进行了一项调查,评估检测的当前使用情况、遗传咨询的提供情况、应识别的疾病类型、对未来使用的偏好、伦理方面以及对监管监督的看法。

结果

15%的受访者会向所有患者提供扩展携带者检测,52.1%会根据患者要求提供。大多数人(67.3%)赞成仅对已知具有重要意义的突变进行检测。在本研究中,79.1%的人支持将NIPT用作所有孕妇唐氏综合征的筛查方法,47.9%的人将NIPT视为侵入性检测的完全替代方法。大多数人支持将其扩展到其他非整倍体(97.5%)和严重早发性孟德尔疾病(90.4%),但不支持用于成人发病疾病(29.8%)或非医学性别鉴定(15.7%)。大多数人(73.2%)认为NIPT会增加轻症疾病状态下的妊娠终止率。受访者赞成专业协会在提供监管监督方面发挥作用。

结论

新基因技术的快速纳入可能受到遗传咨询的可及性、对纳入临床轻症疾病的担忧、意义不明的结果以及成本的限制。

相似文献

1
Obstetricians and gynecologists' practice and opinions of expanded carrier testing and noninvasive prenatal testing.妇产科医生对扩大携带者检测和无创产前检测的实践与看法。
Prenat Diagn. 2014 Feb;34(2):145-52. doi: 10.1002/pd.4272. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
2
Obstetrician-gynecologists' opinions and attitudes on the role of genetics in women's health.妇产科医生对遗传学在女性健康中作用的看法和态度。
J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000 Oct;9(8):873-9. doi: 10.1089/152460900750020900.
3
[Overview of feelings and practices of gynecologists and obstetricians for the noninvasive prenatal testing in France].[法国妇产科医生对无创产前检测的看法与实践概述]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Jan;46(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
4
Screening for Down syndrome: practice patterns and knowledge of obstetricians and gynecologists.唐氏综合征筛查:产科医师和妇科医师的实践模式与知识水平
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jan;107(1):11-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000190215.67096.90.
5
What factors influence obstetrician-gynecologists to follow recommended HIV screening and testing guidelines?哪些因素影响妇产科医生遵循推荐的 HIV 筛查和检测指南?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Jul;21(7):762-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2011.3222. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
6
Survey of physician attitudes toward HIV testing in pregnant women in Ohio.俄亥俄州医生对孕妇进行艾滋病毒检测态度的调查。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2003 Mar;17(3):121-7. doi: 10.1089/108729103763807945.
7
Views of American OB/GYNs on the ethics of prenatal whole-genome sequencing.美国妇产科医生对产前全基因组测序伦理问题的看法。
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Dec;36(13):1250-1256. doi: 10.1002/pd.4968. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
8
Obstetrician/gynecologists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding prevention of infections in pregnancy.妇产科医生关于孕期感染预防的知识、态度和实践。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Aug;18(8):1187-93. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1288.
9
Survey of attitudes of Chinese perinatologists and obstetricians toward non-invasive prenatal genetic testing.中国围产医学专家和产科医生对无创产前基因检测的态度调查
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Nov;42(11):1445-1450. doi: 10.1111/jog.13087. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
10
Practice patterns of obstetrician-gynecologists regarding preconception and prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis.妇产科医生关于孕前和产前囊性纤维化筛查的执业模式。
Genet Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;6(5):450-5. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000139509.04177.4b.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare professionals' perspectives on and experiences with non-invasive prenatal testing: a systematic review.医疗保健专业人员对无创产前检测的看法及体验:一项系统综述
Hum Genet. 2025 Apr;144(4):343-374. doi: 10.1007/s00439-025-02736-y. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
2
Patient perspectives on noninvasive prenatal testing among black women in the United States: a scoping review.美国黑人女性对无创性产前检测的看法:范围综述。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 16;23(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05423-w.
3
Primary care professionals' views on population-based expanded carrier screening: an online focus group study.
基层医疗专业人员对基于人群的扩展携带者筛查的看法:一项在线焦点小组研究。
Fam Pract. 2024 Aug 14;41(4):571-578. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad011.
4
Attitudes of professional stakeholders towards implementation of reproductive genetic carrier screening: a systematic review.专业利益相关者对生殖遗传携带者筛查实施的态度:系统评价。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Apr;31(4):395-408. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01274-9. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
5
Genetic Counselling Needs for Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: A Scoping Review.生殖遗传携带者筛查的遗传咨询需求:一项范围综述
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 11;12(10):1699. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101699.
6
Health practitioners' perceptions of the barriers and enablers to the implementation of reproductive genetic carrier screening: A systematic review.卫生保健从业者对实施生殖遗传携带者筛查的障碍和促进因素的看法:系统评价。
Prenat Diagn. 2021 May;41(6):708-719. doi: 10.1002/pd.5914. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
7
The composition and capacity of the clinical genetics workforce in high-income countries: a scoping review.高收入国家临床遗传学劳动力的构成和能力:范围综述。
Genet Med. 2020 Sep;22(9):1437-1449. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0825-2. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
8
Expanded carrier screening: counseling and considerations.扩展携带者筛查:咨询和考虑因素。
Hum Genet. 2020 Sep;139(9):1131-1139. doi: 10.1007/s00439-019-02080-y. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
9
Should Clinicians Leave "Expanded" Carrier Screening Decisions to Patients?临床医生应将“扩展的”携带者筛查决策留给患者吗?
AMA J Ethics. 2019 Oct 1;21(10):E858-864. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.858.
10
Feasibility of couple-based expanded carrier screening offered by general practitioners.由全科医生提供的基于夫妇的扩展携带者筛查的可行性。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 May;27(5):691-700. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0351-3. Epub 2019 Feb 11.