van den Boer Cindy, Muller Sara H, Vincent Andrew D, van den Brekel Michiel W M, Hilgers Frans J M
Respir Care. 2014 Aug;59(8):1161-71. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02840.
Breathing through a tracheostoma results in insufficient warming and humidification of the inspired air. This loss of air conditioning, especially humidification, can be partially restored with the application of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) over the tracheostoma. For medical professionals, it is not easy to judge differences in water exchange performance of various HMEs owing to the lack of universal outcome measures. This study has three aims: assessment of the water exchange performance of commercially available HMEs for laryngectomized patients, validation of these results with absolute humidity outcomes, and assessment of the role of hygroscopic salt present in some of the tested HMEs.
Measurements of weight and absolute humidity at end inspiration and end expiration at different breathing volumes of a healthy volunteer were performed using a microbalance and humidity sensor. Twenty-three HMEs from 6 different manufacturers were tested. Associations were determined between core weight, weight change, breathing volume, and absolute humidity, using both linear and nonlinear mixed effects models.
Water exchange of the 23 HMEs at a breathing volume of 0.5 L varies between 0.5 and 3.6 mg. Both water exchange and wet core weight correlate strongly with the end-inspiratory absolute humidity values (r2 =0.89/0.87). Hygroscopic salt increases core weight.
The 23 tested HMEs for laryngectomized patients show wide variation in water exchange performance. Water exchange correlates well with the end-inspiratory absolute humidity outcome, which validates the ex vivo weight change method. Wet core weight is a predictor of HME performance. Hygroscopic salt increases the weight of the core material. The results of this study can help medical professionals to obtain a more founded opinion about the performance of available HMEs for pulmonary rehabilitation in laryngectomized patients, and allow them to make an informed decision about which HME type to use.
通过气管造口呼吸会导致吸入空气的加温及加湿不足。这种空气调节功能的丧失,尤其是加湿功能的丧失,可通过在气管造口处应用热湿交换器(HME)来部分恢复。对于医学专业人员而言,由于缺乏通用的结果测量方法,判断各种HME的水交换性能差异并非易事。本研究有三个目的:评估用于喉切除患者的市售HME的水交换性能,用绝对湿度结果验证这些结果,以及评估一些受试HME中存在的吸湿盐的作用。
使用微量天平及湿度传感器,对一名健康志愿者在不同呼吸量时吸气末和呼气末的重量及绝对湿度进行测量。测试了来自6个不同制造商的23种HME。使用线性和非线性混合效应模型确定核心重量、重量变化、呼吸量和绝对湿度之间的关联。
23种HME在呼吸量为0.5升时的水交换量在0.5至3.6毫克之间变化。水交换量和湿核心重量均与吸气末绝对湿度值密切相关(r2 =0.89/0.87)。吸湿盐会增加核心重量。
测试的23种用于喉切除患者的HME的水交换性能差异很大。水交换与吸气末绝对湿度结果密切相关,这验证了体外重量变化方法。湿核心重量是HME性能的一个预测指标。吸湿盐会增加核心材料的重量。本研究结果可帮助医学专业人员对喉切除患者肺部康复中可用HME的性能形成更有依据的看法,并使他们能够就是否使用哪种HME类型做出明智的决定。