• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过一种新问卷评估助听器效果:CISQ(综合可懂度、空间感、音质问卷)

Evaluation of hearing aid benefit through a new questionnaire: CISQ (Complete Intelligibility Spatiality Quality).

作者信息

Giordano P, Argentero P, Canale A, Lacilla M, Albera R

机构信息

Department of Clinic Physiopathology, ENT Division, University of Turin, Italy;

出版信息

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2013 Oct;33(5):329-36.

PMID:24227899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3825048/
Abstract

The purpose of this work was to create a rapid and simple instrument to evaluate the benefits of a hearing aid, that was at the same time reliable and complete. We created a new questionnaire by integration of other well consolidated psychometric tests to better investigate all the aspects that contribute in determining the hearing aid benefit, also considering as important some areas that are not usually considered (spatiality and quality of sound). We started from a 36-item questionnaire divided in six subscales (spatiality and quality of signal, intelligibility in silence, background noise intelligibility, averseness and reverberation), and submitted it to patients before hearing aid application and at 2-3 months after that. A statistically significant difference between results before and after hearing aid application was found. To obtain the final 30-item questionnaire, we analyzed the reliability of each subscale using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and eliminated the item whose internal consistency was lower for every subscale. For these reasons, the CISQ questionnaire is a rapid and simple test that can be considered a reliable and complete instrument to evaluate the benefits of a hearing aid.

摘要

这项工作的目的是创建一种快速、简单的工具来评估助听器的益处,同时该工具要可靠且全面。我们通过整合其他完善的心理测量测试创建了一份新问卷,以更好地研究所有有助于确定助听器益处的方面,同时将一些通常未被考虑的重要领域(空间感和声音质量)也纳入考量。我们从一份包含36个项目、分为六个子量表(信号的空间感和质量、安静环境下的可懂度、背景噪声下的可懂度、厌恶感和混响)的问卷开始,并在患者佩戴助听器之前以及之后2至3个月将其提交给患者。结果发现,佩戴助听器前后的结果存在统计学上的显著差异。为了得到最终的30项问卷,我们使用克朗巴哈系数分析了每个子量表的信度,并删除了每个子量表中内部一致性较低的项目。基于这些原因,CISQ问卷是一种快速、简单的测试,可被视为评估助听器益处的可靠且全面的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb2/3825048/538cdb53f6bd/0392-100X-33-329-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb2/3825048/c19ed9285f72/0392-100X-33-329-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb2/3825048/538cdb53f6bd/0392-100X-33-329-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb2/3825048/c19ed9285f72/0392-100X-33-329-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb2/3825048/538cdb53f6bd/0392-100X-33-329-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of hearing aid benefit through a new questionnaire: CISQ (Complete Intelligibility Spatiality Quality).通过一种新问卷评估助听器效果:CISQ(综合可懂度、空间感、音质问卷)
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2013 Oct;33(5):329-36.
2
Style preference survey: a report on the psychometric properties and a cross-validation experiment.风格偏好调查:关于心理测量特性的报告及交叉验证实验
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Feb;24(2):89-104. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.2.3.
3
Refinement and Validation of the Social Participation Restrictions Questionnaire: An Application of Rasch Analysis and Traditional Psychometric Analysis Techniques.社会参与限制问卷的细化和验证:Rasch 分析和传统心理测量分析技术的应用。
Ear Hear. 2019 Mar/Apr;40(2):328-339. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000618.
4
Hearing aid fitting outcome: clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).助听器验配结果:国际助听器结果量表(IOI-HA)瑞典语译本的临床应用及心理测量特性
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Sep;21(8):512-21. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.8.3.
5
Evaluation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids in a veteran sample.对退伍军人样本中助听器国际成效量表的评估。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Jun;20(6):374-80. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.6.5.
6
Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.助听器中全向性与用户可选择的麦克风模式
Ear Hear. 2003 Oct;24(5):424-39. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000094555.89110.0A.
7
Satisfaction of elderly individuals with hearing aids in the first six months of use.
J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2012;24(4):316-21. doi: 10.1590/s2179-64912012000400005.
8
The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.助听器效益的简要概况。
Ear Hear. 1995 Apr;16(2):176-86. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199504000-00005.
9
Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility.多通道压缩时间常数对主观感知音质和言语清晰度的影响。
Ear Hear. 2002 Aug;23(4):369-80. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200208000-00012.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of a modified Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-D) for patients hospitalized with acute abdominal pain.对丹麦版改良的美国疼痛协会患者结局问卷(APS-POQ-R-D)用于急性腹痛住院患者的心理测量学评估。
Scand J Pain. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):117-130. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0106.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of arabic self-reported measures of hearing, tinnitus and hyperacusis: Limited quality and quantity.关于阿拉伯语自我报告的听力、耳鸣和听觉过敏测量方法的范围综述:质量和数量有限。
Saudi Med J. 2025 Aug;46(8):878-890. doi: 10.15537/smj.2025.46.8.20250172.
2
Client Oriented Scale of Improvement in First-Time and Experienced Hearing Aid Users: An Analysis of Five Predetermined Predictability Categories through Audiometric and Speech Testing.面向初次使用和有经验的助听器用户的客户导向改善量表:通过听力测定和言语测试对五个预先确定的可预测性类别进行分析。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 5;13(13):3956. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133956.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical measures of hearing aid directivity: assumption, accuracy, and reliability.助听方向性的临床评估:假设、准确性和可靠性。
Ear Hear. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):44-56. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182292107.
2
[Indication for and verification of hearing aid benefit using modern methods of speech audiometry in German].[使用现代言语测听方法对助听器益处的指征及验证(德语)]
HNO. 2011 Oct;59(10):1012-21. doi: 10.1007/s00106-011-2345-5.
3
Can you hear me now? Musical training shapes functional brain networks for selective auditory attention and hearing speech in noise.
你现在能听到我说话吗?音乐训练塑造用于选择性听觉注意和在噪声中听语音的功能性脑网络。
Front Psychol. 2011 Jun 13;2:113. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00113. eCollection 2011.
4
Unilateral hearing loss: benefits and satisfaction from the use of hearing aids.单侧听力损失:使用助听器的获益和满意度。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Mar-Apr;77(2):221-8. doi: 10.1590/s1808-86942011000200012.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.中文简称助听获益量表的跨文化调适与验证。
Int J Audiol. 2011 May;50(5):334-9. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.550067. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
6
Adapting to changed hearing: the potential role of formal training.适应听力变化:正规训练的潜在作用。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Oct;21(9):601-11. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.9.6.
7
Auditory training: assessment of the benefit of hearing aids in elderly individuals.听觉训练:评估助听器对老年人的益处。
Pro Fono. 2010 Apr-Jun;22(2):101-6. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872010000200006.
8
A naturalistic approach to assessing hearing aid candidacy and motivating hearing aid use.一种评估助听器适用性及激发助听器使用意愿的自然主义方法。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Nov-Dec;20(10):607-20. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.10.3.
9
Psychological profile and social behaviour of working adults with mild or moderate hearing loss.轻度或中度听力损失在职成年人的心理状况与社会行为
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008 Apr;28(2):61-6.
10
Measuring the psychosocial consequences of hearing loss in a working adult population: focus on validity and reliability of the Italian translation of the hearing handicap inventory.测量在职成年人群听力损失的心理社会后果:聚焦听力障碍量表意大利语翻译的效度和信度。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2007 Aug;27(4):186-91.