Dickson Sylvia, Logan Janet, Hagen Suzanne, Stark Diane, Glazener Cathryn, McDonald Alison M, McPherson Gladys
Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Buchanan House, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Trials. 2013 Nov 15;14:389. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-389.
Successful recruitment of participants to any trial is central to its success. Trial results are routinely published, and recruitment is often cited to be slower and more difficult than anticipated. This article reflects on the methodological challenges of recruiting women with prolapse attending United Kingdom (UK) gynaecology outpatient clinics to a multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of physiotherapy, and the systems put in place in an attempt to address them.
Gynaecology outpatients with symptomatic prolapse were to be recruited over a 16-month period from 14 UK hospitals and one New Zealand hospital. Eligible women were informed about the trial by their gynaecologist and informed consent was obtained by the central trial office. Recruitment difficulties were encountered early on, and a number of strategies were employed to try to improve recruitment.
Some strategies were more successful than others and they differed in the resources required. Actions that facilitated recruitment included increasing recruiting centres to 23 UK and two international hospitals, good centre support, using processes embedded in clinical practice, and good communication between the trial office, collaborators and participants. Collaborator incentives, whereby staff involved received the benefit immediately, were more successful than a nominal monetary payment per woman randomised. Barriers to recruitment included fewer eligible women than anticipated, patient's preference to receive active treatment rather than allocation to the control group, lack of support staff and high staff turnover. Geographical variations in Primary Care Trust Research Management and Governance approval systems and general practitioner (GP) referral procedures also impacted negatively on recruitment.
Our article reflects on the methodological challenges of recruiting to a multi-centre RCT in a UK gynaecology setting. Effective interventions included increasing the number of recruiting centres and providing collaborator incentives. Barriers to recruitment included fewer eligible women than anticipated, patient's preference to be allocated to the treatment group, lack of support staff, and variations in approval systems and GP referral procedures. To improve the evidence base on clinical trial recruitment, trialists need to publish their experiences and lessons learned. Future RCTs should evaluate, where possible, the effect of strategies designed to improve recruitment and retention.
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN35911035.
成功招募参与者是任何试验取得成功的核心。试验结果通常会发表,而招募工作往往被认为比预期的要慢且更困难。本文反思了在英国妇科门诊招募子宫脱垂女性参与一项物理治疗多中心随机对照试验(RCT)所面临的方法学挑战,以及为解决这些挑战而建立的系统。
在16个月的时间里,从英国的14家医院和一家新西兰医院招募有症状子宫脱垂的妇科门诊患者。符合条件的女性由其妇科医生告知该试验,中央试验办公室获取知情同意书。早期就遇到了招募困难,并采用了一些策略来试图改善招募情况。
一些策略比其他策略更成功,且所需资源不同。促进招募的行动包括将招募中心增加到英国的23家医院和两家国际医院、良好的中心支持、采用临床实践中固有的流程,以及试验办公室、合作者和参与者之间的良好沟通。合作者激励措施(即相关工作人员能立即受益)比每位随机分组女性的名义金钱支付更成功。招募的障碍包括符合条件的女性比预期少、患者更倾向于接受积极治疗而非被分配到对照组、缺乏支持人员以及工作人员流动率高。初级保健信托研究管理与治理批准系统以及全科医生(GP)转诊程序的地域差异也对招募产生了负面影响。
我们的文章反思了在英国妇科环境中进行多中心RCT招募所面临的方法学挑战。有效的干预措施包括增加招募中心数量和提供合作者激励措施。招募的障碍包括符合条件的女性比预期少、患者更倾向于被分配到治疗组、缺乏支持人员,以及批准系统和GP转诊程序的差异。为了完善临床试验招募的证据基础,试验者需要发表他们的经验和教训。未来的RCT应尽可能评估旨在改善招募和保留率的策略的效果。
当前受控试验ISRCTN35911035 。