Mulogo E M, Batwala V, Nuwaha F, Aden A S, Baine O S
Department of Community Health, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, PO Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.
Afr Health Sci. 2013 Jun;13(2):423-9. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v13i2.32.
In Uganda, the main stay for provision of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) has been at health facilities. Home based VCT on the other hand, was initiated in the country to improve service coverage.
To evaluate the cost effectiveness of facility- and home-based HIV VCT strategies in rural southwestern Uganda.
Data on costs and effectiveness of facility- and home-based HIV VCT intervention strategies was collected in two sub-Counties in rural southwestern Uganda. Costing was performed using the ingredients approach. Effectiveness was measured as the number of HIV sero-positive clients identified. Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) were calculated from the provider perspective.
The cost per client tested were US$6.4 for facility based VCT and US$5.0 for home based VCT. The corresponding costs per positive case identified were US$86.5 and US$54.7 respectively. The incremental cost to providers per additional positive case identified by facility based VCT was US$3.5.
Home based VCT was the least costly strategy per client tested and was also cost effective in identifying HIV sero-positive clients in rural areas. This strategy should therefore be promoted to improve service coverage and thereby facilitate early and extensive detection of clients eligible for treatment.
在乌干达,提供人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)自愿咨询和检测(VCT)的主要场所一直是医疗机构。另一方面,该国启动了基于家庭的VCT以提高服务覆盖范围。
评估乌干达西南部农村地区基于医疗机构和基于家庭的HIV VCT策略的成本效益。
在乌干达西南部农村的两个乡收集了基于医疗机构和基于家庭的HIV VCT干预策略的成本和效果数据。采用成分法进行成本核算。效果以检测出的HIV血清阳性患者数量来衡量。从提供者角度计算增量成本效益比(ICER)。
基于医疗机构的VCT每位检测者的成本为6.4美元,基于家庭的VCT为5.0美元。相应地,每发现一例阳性病例的成本分别为86.5美元和54.7美元。基于医疗机构的VCT每多发现一例阳性病例,提供者的增量成本为3.5美元。
基于家庭的VCT是每位检测者成本最低的策略,在识别农村地区HIV血清阳性患者方面也具有成本效益。因此,应推广这一策略以提高服务覆盖范围,从而促进对符合治疗条件的患者进行早期和广泛检测。