Suppr超能文献

库欣综合征的同期双侧肾上腺切除术:腹腔镜手术与后腹腔镜手术及机器人手术入路对比

Synchronous bilateral adrenalectomy for Cushing's syndrome: laparoscopic versus posterior retroperitoneoscopic versus robotic approach.

作者信息

Raffaelli Marco, Brunaud Laurent, De Crea Carmela, Hoche Guillaume, Oragano Luigi, Bresler Laurent, Bellantone Rocco, Lombardi Celestino P

机构信息

Division of Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery, Istituto di Semeiotica Chirurgica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico "A. Gemelli", L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy,

出版信息

World J Surg. 2014 Mar;38(3):709-15. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2326-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Synchronous endoscopic bilateral adrenalectomy (BilA) can effectively provide definitive cure of hypercortisolism in ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome and in primary adrenal bilateral disease. We compared three different approaches for BilA: transabdominal laparoscopic BilA (TL-BilA), simultaneous posterior retroperitoneoscopic BilA (PR-BilA), and robot-assisted BilA (RA-BilA).

METHODS

All patients who underwent BilA between January 1999 and December 2012 at two referral centers (one performing TL-BilA and PR-BilA and one performing RA-BilA) were included. A comparative analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were included: 5 underwent TL-BilA, 11 underwent PR-BilA, and 13 underwent RA-BilA. No significant difference was found concerning age, gender, diagnosis, and previous abdominal surgery. No conversion to open approach was registered. Operative time was significantly shorter for the PR-BilA group than for the TL-BilA and RA-BilA groups (157.4 ± 54.6 vs 256.0 ± 43.4 vs 221.5 ± 42.2 min, respectively) (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found concerning intraoperative and postoperative complications rate and time to first flatus. Drains were used routinely after PR-BilA and TL-BilA and electively in four RA-BilA patients (P < 0.001). Hospital stay was longer in the TL-BilA and PR-BilA groups than in the RA-BilA group (12.0 ± 5.7 vs 10.8 ± 3.7 vs 4.4 ± 1.7 days, respectively) (P < 0.001). No recurrence or disease-related death was registered.

CONCLUSIONS

Operative time was significantly shorter in the PR-BilA group, because it eliminates the need to reposition the patient. The number of drains and the length of hospital stay were reduced after RA-BilA, but this was likely related to different management protocols in different settings. Because no significant difference was found in terms of postoperative outcome, none of the three operative approaches can be considered the preferable one.

摘要

背景

同步内镜双侧肾上腺切除术(BilA)能有效根治促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)依赖性库欣综合征及原发性双侧肾上腺疾病中的皮质醇增多症。我们比较了三种不同的BilA手术方法:经腹腹腔镜双侧肾上腺切除术(TL-BilA)、同期后腹腔镜双侧肾上腺切除术(PR-BilA)和机器人辅助双侧肾上腺切除术(RA-BilA)。

方法

纳入1999年1月至2012年12月在两个转诊中心接受BilA手术的所有患者(一个中心进行TL-BilA和PR-BilA手术,另一个中心进行RA-BilA手术)。进行了对比分析。

结果

共纳入29例患者:5例行TL-BilA,11例行PR-BilA,13例行RA-BilA。在年龄、性别、诊断及既往腹部手术方面未发现显著差异。未出现转为开放手术的情况。PR-BilA组的手术时间显著短于TL-BilA组和RA-BilA组(分别为157.4±54.6分钟、256.0±43.4分钟和221.5±42.2分钟)(P<0.001)。在术中及术后并发症发生率和首次排气时间方面未发现显著差异。PR-BilA和TL-BilA术后常规放置引流管,4例RA-BilA患者选择性放置引流管(P<0.001)。TL-BilA组和PR-BilA组的住院时间长于RA-BilA组(分别为12.0±5.7天、10.8±3.7天和4.4±1.7天)(P<0.001)。未出现复发或疾病相关死亡。

结论

PR-BilA组的手术时间显著缩短,因为无需重新摆放患者体位。RA-BilA术后引流管数量减少、住院时间缩短,但这可能与不同机构的不同管理方案有关。由于术后结果方面未发现显著差异,三种手术方法均不能被视为更优选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验