A comparison of the effect of 5-bromodeoxyuridine substitution on 33258 Hoechst- and DAPI-fluorescence of isolated chromosomes by bivariate flow karyotyping.

Application of the fluorescent DNA-intercalator propidium iodide for stabilization of the mitotic chromosome structure during isolation of chromosomes from V79 Chinese hamster cells and subsequent staining with the fluorochromes 33258 Hoechst or DAPI allowed bivariate flow karyotyping of isolated chromosomes. Fluorescence of 33258 Hoechst bound to isolated chromosomes containing 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) was quenched in comparison with the fluorescence of control chromosomes. Despite structural relationship and similarity of both absorption and fluorescence spectra of DAPI and 33258 Hoechst, reduction of fluorescence of DAPI-stained isolated chromosomes was not observed, by contrast with findings in conventional cytological metaphase preparations. It could be obtained, however, by preirradiation of the chromosomes with near-UV in the presence of DAPI. This led to a progressive destruction of the chromosomes. Destruction also occurred without BrdUrd, though at a slower rate. Preirradiation of chromosomes in the presence of 33258 Hoechst hardly affected the integrity of the chromosomes. Preirradiation of a 33258 Hoechst solution and its subsequent use as a stain resulted in a considerably decreased fluorescence of chromosomes. For DAPI this effect was small. Thus, whereas 33258 Hoechst itself is much more sensitive to near-UV irradiation than DAPI, DAPI bound to DNA in chromosomes renders the DNA much more sensitive to irradiation than 33258 Hoechst bound to DNA. Presumably, these differences can at least partly be reduced to the different molecular sizes of the dyes.